Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   1911 Forum (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f57/)
-   -   decisions decisions... (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f57/decisions-decisions-105694/)

rustypixel 04-01-2014 06:03 AM

decisions decisions...
 
3 Attachment(s)
Gonna have to pick just one...

Colt Defender, New Agent or Kimber Ultra Crimson Carry II.

Gatoragn 04-01-2014 09:00 AM

New Agent gets my vote. But it's your money.

sputnik1988 04-01-2014 09:37 AM

I'd prefer the defender, only because of the traditional sights, it would make it better for range use. Carry may be it's primary use but ya still gotta shoot it.

KG7IL 04-01-2014 03:28 PM

Give the difference in sights, serious consideration. Primary use should dictate. (I like Kimber's Meprolights, made in Israel).
Give the grip a hands-on evaluation. I avoid finger grooves if they are not perfect for me.

Get all three and avoid the dilemma of choosing.

JonM 04-01-2014 03:28 PM

New agent or defender. The kimber isnt even a contender.

Ive got a new agent and its surprisingly accurate at moderate ranges and just sweet at 7 yards. I dont carry it much anymore in favor of bigger full size guns. Ever since wisconsin established that the state constitution gauruntees oc i havent needed a deep ccw gun in a big caliber. Its not a pocket gun.

wittmeba 04-01-2014 03:35 PM

I wish I had to make this decision :)

My choice order would be Colt Defender, Kimber Ultra Crimson Carry II or New Agent.








Axxe55 likes this http://www.firearmstalk.com/images/thumbs_up.gif (just trying to help ya out - you are getting dangerously low on likes - remember 50,000 per person :) )

purehavoc 04-01-2014 03:37 PM

After reading about barrel rust amongst a few other issues with the Kimber 1911's , I would take that Colt Defender for carry use . I prefer the tradition sights myself

Mauserdoc 04-01-2014 03:39 PM

My primary carry gun is one I built myself on a Para 1911 frame. Nothing pretty about the outside and looks completely bare except for the extended slide stop safety. Even has plain jane iron sights. Inside is a completely different story tho. It's for protection, nothing else. That being said, it's the New Agent that gets my vote.

therukh 04-01-2014 04:10 PM

Finger Grooves
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KG7IL (Post 1546198)
Give the difference in sights, serious consideration. Primary use should dictate. (I like Kimber's Meprolights, made in Israel).
Give the grip a hands-on evaluation. I avoid finger grooves if they are not perfect for me.

Get all three and avoid the dilemma of choosing.

I don't like finger groves either unless they're perfect for me. I like the idea of getting all three too. ;} But I don't have that kind of money. That said, the grips could be changed on the Kimber and the Defender but that's defeating the purpose of the Kimber. I've owned and used guns with no sights for carry and I have no problem with that. They are surprisingly accurate out to 7 yards or so. Now, the decision...I think I'd go New Agent, Defender & then Kimber. Just make sure you really break them in sufficiently as 1911's sometimes need a lot of work to make them run reliably...manufacturer's claims not withstanding.

SSGN_Doc 04-01-2014 05:35 PM

I'd go with the Defender. You have sight options if you ever want to swap out, and y9ou ohaven't paid for a laser, and I'm not a fan of series II Kimbers. Grips are abundant, if you don't like the Hogues on the Defender.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.