Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   1911 Forum (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f57/)
-   -   Colts: Defender vs New Agent (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f57/colts-defender-vs-new-agent-7464/)

bgeddes 10-08-2008 04:54 AM

Colts: Defender vs New Agent
 
It seems other than finish these are the same piece? I am in the market for a smaller 1911 and I can not figure out what I am missing in comparison of these two weapons.

Before it starts, the small Kimbers are on the list too, just researching the best way to spend my dollars. Charles Daly makes a small .45 ACP unit, but data on their quality seems inconsistent. The mind is open to suggestions, as long as they are 1911s. :p

billdeserthills 10-12-2008 05:59 PM

These are very close, however the Agent does Not have sights on it, I suppose to better facilitate the "quick draw" I remember seeing a Detonics model made in a similar fashion, not a big seller either. I do like the Defender, unless you're a crack shot, you are going to want to have sights on your gun!

canebrake 01-07-2009 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgeddes (Post 44073)
It seems other than finish these are the same piece? I am in the market for a smaller 1911 and I can not figure out what I am missing in comparison of these two weapons.

Before it starts, the small Kimbers are on the list too, just researching the best way to spend my dollars. Charles Daly makes a small .45 ACP unit, but data on their quality seems inconsistent. The mind is open to suggestions, as long as they are 1911s. :p

I have the Defender and love it.

http://i414.photobucket.com/albums/p...brbuckle_0.gif

You won't go wrong!

cane

http://i414.photobucket.com/albums/p...090958_MED.jpg

squib 01-08-2009 03:06 AM

Call Colt for all info. on specs---1-800-962-2658 (customer service)
Kimber web site is really descriptive as to specs--WWW.kimberamerica.com

Personal recommendation--Look very serious at Kimber ! May be a buck or two more but is truly "Quality"-- You won't miss that buck or two next year but if you purchase poor quality,it will haunt you !

The best deciding factor after you have ALL the facts is....which one do YOU like ? ;)

Bighead 01-08-2009 08:11 AM

The lack of sights is the main difference from what I can tell. The gun uses a "sight-channel" concept instead of raised sights. The idea is that it is easier to conceal. They are betting that the gun will be used for close-quarters, point-shooting type scenarios. My choice would be the Defender, or a compact Kimber with sights.

Colt New Agent
http://www.tactical-life.com/online/...w-agent-sa.gif

The sight channel idea was also used in the Kimber Ultra RCP a couple of years ago. I think it is kind of gimmicky, but can see how it might make it slightly easier to carry (maybe), and the channel would be better than no sights for close-quarters since you could use it as an index while looking over the top of the gun. I personally would rather have a good set of lo-mounts.

The Kimber Ultra RCP
http://www.americanhandgunner.com/Ftr0507/KIMBER3.jpg
http://www.americanhandgunner.com/Ftr0507/KIMBER6.jpg http://www.americanhandgunner.com/Ftr0507/KIMBER1a.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.