Arched, or Flat? - Page 3
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > 1911 Forum >

Arched, or Flat?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2010, 02:37 AM   #21
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Morgo's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Liked 35 Times on 26 Posts
Likes Given: 10


I prefer flat.
Morgo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 04:09 PM   #22
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Overkill0084's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,714
Liked 3257 Times on 1636 Posts
Likes Given: 433


I've shot both. 6 of one/ 1/2 dozen the other. Shooting wise, I really never noticed improvement/deficiency either way. My current one's have flat MSHs. I prefer the look of the flat, FWIW.
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 03:27 PM   #23
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
masterPsmith's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barstow area, Kalifornia
Posts: 1,347
Liked 92 Times on 69 Posts
Likes Given: 25


I prefer arched, even on my Para P-14. It's all personal preference on which provides a better, comfortable hold and natural point of aim.

masterPsmith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2010, 05:39 PM   #24
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 98
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


My Kimbers have always been flat. I'm used to it that way. I think arched would maybe be better for very large hands. I know Wilson makes one that is slightly angled. I guess the idea is that it is supposed to make your hand ride higher on the grip safety. That type of mainspring housing makes some sense to me provided you have an extended beaver tail.
sigp250 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2010, 01:15 AM   #25
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,325
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts


I find the arched to be a bit more comfortable, but not enough to get excited about. I also shoot equally poorly with either. I think the reason so many pistols come with flat housings these days is that the stock Gov't Models came with arched so it was an easy custom touch.
freefall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 03:58 PM   #26
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Plains,Missouri
Posts: 74
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 7


When I purchased my Brolin Arms 1911 Government L45 it came with a flat housing and yes, I shot low. So I "upgraded" to an arched housing and loved it. Then I added a Chip McCormick High Ride Beavertail safety with "memory bump." After shooting my RIA 1911CS with the flat MSH and finding I shot well with it, I changed the MSH on the Brolin full-sized pistol back to the original flat MSH and found that it now made no difference. The high-ride beavertail and memory bump seem to have made the arched MSH redundant and unnecessary.
brolin_1911a1 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Flat vs arched mainspring housings NGIB 1911 Forum 16 10-26-2009 10:52 PM
WTS:MP5 Receiver Flat $174.99 Cope's Distributing Sponsor Display 0 12-19-2008 03:44 PM
FMC-FLAT Ammo Steve-M Ammunition & Reloading 2 08-07-2008 07:23 PM
Mainspring Housing: Flat or Arched? Zappa 1911 Forum 7 05-24-2008 05:53 AM
Arched Mag Well and Recoil Buffer cactusjack 1911 Forum 3 02-20-2008 08:07 PM

Newest Threads