Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > 1911 Forum > 460 Rowland

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2010, 07:56 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default 460 Rowland

For the few of you who may have jumped on this bandwagon (like you, Master Cane), I am doing it yet again. I sold my first attempt to an unexpecting young fellow, who was just bug eyed over the power. I felt that just going only with the Clark setup was inadequate.

Well, now that I am communicating with Sprinco, I am doing another (yes, Master Cane, with yet another Smith and Wesson - I just like to go with the BEST).

It seems Sprinco is taking the approach that a fellow named Menck started years ago with specially designed recoil rods incorperating a built-in supplemental coil spring that prevents slide to frame impact - gradually - unlike buffers. I begin to notice peening to their recoil rod base.

So my point for this posting is for anyone who has gone this route, have you found ANY signs of peening to the recoil rod base, link, frame, or anything else?

To the best of my memory, I believe I had only fired 300 rounds of Georgia Arms ammo through it.

__________________

Last edited by SHAMUSPI; 08-14-2010 at 08:01 AM.
SHAMUSPI is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 08-15-2010, 12:08 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1414 Times on 808 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

I am running a stock CCG kit with the exception of the (extremely light) ISMI 14CS - 14 lbs, chrome silicon recoil spring in my Colt XSE SS Government with no buffer.

Ask gorknoids or utf59 if either felt like the gun's timing was anything other than smooth and "Colt Like"!

I have no worries nor have I witnessed ANY accelerated wear/peening on the recoil rod/link/frame or anything else. (Your concern must be with the S&W because the Colt is doing fine.)

I have ran everything from Georgia Arms 460 Rowland 185gr JHPs, 230gr Speer Bonded Unicore JHPs to Cor-Bon Hunter 255gr JHP BC (Bonded Core).

Also I have ran (With no issues) both .45 ACP ball, .45 ACP JHP in standard and +P loads.

Hell, friends and visitors have shot over 300 rounds and I've doubled that with 80%+ using the ISMI 14# spring.

I think your $90, Sprinco Recoil Management Guide Rod System is a solution to a non-existent problem. (At least in my Colt.)

If anything should be of concern IMHO, it would be your S&W's external extractor, another solution to a non-existent problem. (At least in my Colt.)

I applaud your effort to revisit the 460 as a one-shot-stopper. Keep us in the loop.

I understand Buffalo Bore Ammunition Co. plans to introduce four or five 460 Rowland loads in 2011. WOOT!!!

Buffalo Bore Products Coming Soon

__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 02:41 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default

After rereading my OP, I think I misstated/mislead you when I said that I began to notice peening at the base of their recoil rod. The rod was Clark's, not Sprinco's. Sprinco tells me they have received numerous statements to this effect, no matter what brand of pistol the Clark rod is installed in. Sprinco asked me to fire a few rounds through my next setup with the Clark rod and send it to them for analysis. Then they will make whatever alterations to their rod base to solve this problem.

Master Cane, the problem was not with the gun's manufacturer, but with the Clark rod trying to be something for everyone, Colt or S&W. You are speaking of a few hundred rounds with no problems - YET. I am looking for a lifetime gun with perhaps several thousands of rounds thru it. The Sprinco system is good insurance that my S&W won't turn into one of the hundreds of thousands of rattle trap Colts out there. And as far as Smith's external extractor, at least it does not have to be constantly adjusted and or replaced, like yours.

Love and (uck!) kisses to ya, Master Cane.

__________________

Last edited by SHAMUSPI; 08-15-2010 at 02:47 AM.
SHAMUSPI is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 03:00 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1414 Times on 808 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

I like this guy.

I don't know why, but I'll just roll with it.

__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 06:05 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canebrake View Post
I like this guy.

I don't know why, but I'll just roll with it.
Obviously, it is because of my warm, sensitive personality

Master Cane, what little I know about you - I like! I have read that you were an engineer with GM, and are an avid gun nut. Good.

What I really appreciate is that you are no BS'er. Well, except for being on Colt drugs. I too was once in a frontier mode: single actions, lever rifles; you know, OLD stuff - like Colts. But then again, old stuff for ...............

A little side question; do you think that a 460 Rowland is too much as a defensive sidearm? Personally, I feel nothing less than a howitzer is adequate for a bad guy, but we do have to worry about demolising (sic) the building behind him (or her). I know this will be politically incorrect, but I feel if I have to shoot I want to take out the bad guys spine also. So, how much is too much?
__________________
SHAMUSPI is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Big Thunder II Vs. Fenrir: The 1911 .460 Rowland Build Off Dillinger DIY Projects 233 04-16-2014 04:55 PM
460 Rowland SHAMUSPI Ammunition & Reloading 0 03-08-2010 10:11 PM
.460 Rowland - Double Stack Possible? ccginc DIY Projects 27 08-10-2009 10:29 PM