You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > 1911 Forum >

1911 choices

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2013, 01:41 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Stillersfan's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 520
Liked 80 Times on 61 Posts
Likes Given: 366


My first choice would be to get the Kimber but you stated that you were already against doing that so my next choice would be the SA. Worth the money all the way and you cant beat the warranty!
Gun Control: The ability to get perfect groups on center mass under extreme stress.

Sig P220 Equinox, Sig P238
Glock 19
S&W M&P 45ACP, S&W M&P Shield 9MM
Kimber Ultra Carry II
Kimber Sapphire Ultra Carry II
Kimber Stainless Pro Raptor II
Kel Tec PF9, Kel Tec P32
Ruger SR9, Ruger SR9C
Remington 887 Nitro Mag Tactical (12g)
Walther PPS
Ruger SR556E
Springfield XDs 9MM/45 ACP
SKS Chinese Norinco
Mosin Nagant 91/30 (2)
NRA Member
Stillersfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 02:25 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Overkill0084's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,909
Liked 3464 Times on 1746 Posts
Likes Given: 513


Originally Posted by custom1911 View Post
So I've had many many 1911"s over the years but I don't currently have one. I'm in the market hard for one and I've narrowed it down too three! I'm looking at the Springfield range officer, kimber stainless target 2 or the colt gold up trophy. I assume that the kimber and SA will run about the same as far as action and accuracy. But the big question is it worth the extra money to buy the colt? I've had several several Kimbers and from my experience the more u spend the guns don't get any better, unless u step to the custom shop series obviously. U get more bells an whistles but the gun itself isn't any better. So would it be worth spending the extra 500 to buy the colt or will they shoot the same as far as recoil and accuracy? I hope someone is knowledgeable about SA and colt bc I am def not!
The Range Officer is a bit more entry level when compared to the rest of the group you are considering. A fine shooter, but not a direct competitor for a Gold Cup or even the Target II. Nor is it intended to be. It's designed to get price conscious shooters into the game. Which it does nicely. It would very likely serve you well for many years, but it's no Gold Cup. Of the Springfield stable, a fairer comparison would be with the Trophy Match.
Of your three choices, to the exclusion of all other options, I'd go with the Colt.
I have a problem with Kimber's one year warranty. IMHO, if you want to play in the big leagues with a premium price structure, you should have a competitive warranty. (Whether you buy into Kimber's reputation for lapses in quality is an entirely different discussion.)
FWIW, I own a SA Trophy Match and it is an excellent pistol.
Oh, one more thing about Springfields, you will want to budget for a trigger job. One humorous explanation that I've heard is that the Springfield Armory Legal Department does the triggers. While not horrible, the trigger on my TM didn't hold a candle to the ones on my Dan Wessons. One $45 trigger job later and it's excellent.
Say...Have you had a look at the Dan Wesson product line?
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
bartwatkins Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
new 1911 purchase choices D.C. 1911 Forum 12 09-03-2012 12:27 AM
So many choices.... mrb1982 1911 Forum 48 12-29-2011 03:26 PM
Choices AznZOhAn AR-15 Discussion 15 08-27-2011 07:04 AM
IWB choices StanDJ77 Glock Forum 13 05-28-2011 05:21 AM
More choices cnorman18 The Club House 0 08-19-2007 03:40 AM