 |
|
07-31-2012, 06:07 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
are the recoils the same between 9 & 40
Some say 9mm has more recoil, & some say 40
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 06:09 AM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 512
Liked 37 Times on 28 Posts
|
.40 has more. Especially in a sub compact. 9mm will never have more recoil. Thread done.
__________________
spit hell fire
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 06:10 AM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 512
Liked 37 Times on 28 Posts
|
Oh and .40 has more recoil than .45acp also.
__________________
spit hell fire
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 06:46 AM
|
#4
|
|
Resident Lurker / Mil-surp nut.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 1,988
Liked 246 Times on 181 Posts Likes Given: 572
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by niteglock
Oh and .40 has more recoil than .45acp also.
|
I disagree, my 1911 and the XD45 my friend has have ALWAYS had a more recoil than my Beretta 96 or his XD40.
40 S&W does have harder recoil than a 9mm, but not a ton, both are very manageable.
Felt recoil is also different for different people, it depends on several variables, shoot both and decide for yourself.
__________________
Support the NRA
.22LR, 9x19, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .45 Colt, 5.56x45, 7.62x39, .303 British, 308 Winchester, 30-06 Springfield, 7.62x54R, 8mm Mauser, .50 BP
Last edited by sputnik1988; 07-31-2012 at 06:49 AM.
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 06:52 AM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 512
Liked 37 Times on 28 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sputnik1988
I disagree, my 1911 and the XD45 my friend has have ALWAYS had a more recoil than my Beretta 96 or his XD40.
40 S&W does have harder recoil than a 9mm, but not a ton, both are very manageable.
Felt recoil is also different for different people, it depends on several variables, shoot both and decide for yourself.
|
I'll agree u put it better than me. But in my opinion. .40 is def more than 9mm and more snappier than .45. Should've put it that way. Sorry. .45 is more manageable than .40 and 9mm is more manageable than .40.
__________________
spit hell fire
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 06:57 AM
|
#6
|
|
Resident Lurker / Mil-surp nut.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 1,988
Liked 246 Times on 181 Posts Likes Given: 572
|
Out of curiosity, what kind of .40 and .45 are you shooting?
__________________
Support the NRA
.22LR, 9x19, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .45 Colt, 5.56x45, 7.62x39, .303 British, 308 Winchester, 30-06 Springfield, 7.62x54R, 8mm Mauser, .50 BP
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 07:03 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 512
Liked 37 Times on 28 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sputnik1988
Out of curiosity, what kind of .40 and .45 are you shooting?
|
Glock 21 and glock 23 and smith .40. Full. Oh and springer TRP .45.
9mm's= berettaM9, Sig P226, XDm9. All full sIze
__________________
spit hell fire
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 07:09 AM
|
#8
|
|
Resident Lurker / Mil-surp nut.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 1,988
Liked 246 Times on 181 Posts Likes Given: 572
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by niteglock
Glock 21 and glock 23 and smith .40. Full. Oh and springer TRP .45.
9mm's= berettaM9, Sig P226, XDm9. All full sIze
|
Like I said, felt recoil varies from person to person, kind of odd that the 23 recoils more than the 21 though.
__________________
Support the NRA
.22LR, 9x19, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .45 Colt, 5.56x45, 7.62x39, .303 British, 308 Winchester, 30-06 Springfield, 7.62x54R, 8mm Mauser, .50 BP
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 07:50 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 512
Liked 37 Times on 28 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sputnik1988
Like I said, felt recoil varies from person to person, kind of odd that the 23 recoils more than the 21 though.
|
I wouldn't say it's more of a recoil but a snappiness. The .40 is def more snappy than .45.
__________________
spit hell fire
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 08:20 AM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 752
Liked 233 Times on 151 Posts Likes Given: 42
|
When your talking about felt recoil, which is all anyone really cares about, there are several factors that come into play:
Recoil pulse - this is how the actual energy is distributed into the hand.
Hold - The way the shooter holds his firearm affects how the pulse is interpreted.
Firearm design - The height of the barrel over the arm centerline affects how much "whip" is perceived; The lower the barrel, the easier for the body to absorb the recoil pulse in a straight line. As an example, Chiappa Firearms changed the barrel on a .357 revolver from the 12 o'clock position to th 6 o'clock position, thereby greatly reducing the difference in barrel height that revolver shooters generally have to compensate for. The Chiappa revolver is reported to have greatly reduced felt recoil.
Stance - The body absorbs recoil differently depending on arm position, shoulder position, stance and posture. Even locking or unlocking elbows can affect recoil perception.
Ammunition - All elements of ammunition affect recoil. Small vs large primer, slow vs fast powder, size of bullet (differences of 1/10,000 of an inch can change resistance of force), if the bullet is crimped in the case, if the bullet is lead or jacketed (resistance against the barrel), different types of rifling will resist differently, etc.
And all of these have an effect in a wide array of varying degrees. All of this to say that felt recoil is a very personal thing and very hard to quantify scientifically. The best thing to do is "Try before you buy" on any new gun, But you must also realize that if you have a gun that is perfect in every way but only slightly uncomfortable, there are ways to change the recoil on your firearm: change grips, change barrel, change ammo, and others. Felt recoil is probably the most subjective part of shooting sports there ever was!
__________________
Edmund Burke: “The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.” – 1784 speech. Taken from Founding Fathers Notes
"In a State of Nature, it is true, that a Man of superior Force may beat or rob me; but then it is true, that I am at full Liberty to defend myself, or make Reprisal by Surprize or by Cunning, or by any other way in which I may be superior to him. But in Political Society ... if I attempt to avenge myself, the whole Force of that Society is ready to complete my Ruin."
-Edmund Burke, A Vindication of Natural Society (1757), original spelling and punctuation.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|