Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   Glock Forum (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f56/)
-   -   Ported vs compensated barrel (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f56/ported-vs-compensated-barrel-105826/)

PalmB 04-04-2014 06:24 PM

Ported vs compensated barrel
 
I'm very interested into picking up a Glock 20/29. I was recently at the range and the range officer heard me talking about it and let me shoot his G20. It felt amazing! It was compensated and started looking into it. I found barrels on the glock store that were ported and other ones that were compensated. What's the difference between the two? What are the pros and cons of both? Thanks guys for the info


Sent from my iPhone using Firearms Talk

John_Deer 04-05-2014 02:45 AM

The 10mm is not a hard kicking cartridge in a well balanced pistol. I like the Glock 20 with just a plain Jane, Glock barrel. I would shoot a Glock 20 before I considered anything to reduce recoil. The Glock 20 weighs 39 oz when loaded. That is just my two cents.

JTJ 04-05-2014 02:58 AM

On a semi auto pistol the ported barrel is drilled or cut and requires a slide that is opened to allow venting. The compensated barrel is extended past the slide.

Mercator 04-05-2014 03:42 AM

The #1 con for both is noise. You will need more ear protection, if you care for your hearing in the long run.

I would go with a removable compensator. Once you have a threaded barrel, you can choose a variety of muzzle devices such as a suppressor.

Axxe55 04-05-2014 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mercator (Post 1549901)
The #1 con for both is noise. You will need more ear protection, if you care for your hearing in the long run.

I would go with a removable compensator. Once you have a threaded barrel, you can choose a variety of muzzle devices such as a suppressor.

good option for a semi-auto, but porting seems to be a better option for a revolver.

Franklin1995 04-05-2014 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mercator (Post 1549901)
The #1 con for both is noise. You will need more ear protection, if you care for your hearing in the long run.

I've seen people say this all the time. Am I the only one who always doubles up on ear protection no matter what? Just curious as to what others do

Franklin

JW357 04-05-2014 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franklin1995 (Post 1549925)
I've seen people say this all the time. Am I the only one who always doubles up on ear protection no matter what? Just curious as to what others do

Franklin

I double up when I'm shooting inside.

Mercator 04-05-2014 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franklin1995 (Post 1549925)
I've seen people say this all the time. Am I the only one who always doubles up on ear protection no matter what? Just curious as to what others do

Franklin

I double down, but most people who I shoot with don't. The only other precaution is not to shoot a whole arsenal in one session. The damage is cumulative. You can't block bone conduction.

JTJ 04-06-2014 02:45 PM

Something else to consider with ported or compensated guns. They are not worth a crap at night. In addition to the noise you will get excessive muzzle flash making a fast follow up shot difficult if not impossible. I say this from experience.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.