"You must be the self entitled know it all huh. I have dealt with guys like you before, to say I am immature is an outright reflection of your opinion and is not justified from a common question I have heard all over the place. But you go ahead and try to put me down for asking this oh so common question. Your the one who is making things personal instead of staying on topic. So whatever you think is unbecoming I don't give a crap. I am a shooter always have been, always will be. I don't know about you but I have the back bone to kill in sight any armed threat on my property. If you don't then don't take it out on my forum. If you want to act like an adult and stop with the personal attacks anytime soon that would be nice. But I'm sure you will reply to this and freak out on me. Anyway I'm gonna stick to topic while you hate"
I think the question answered by Wilfully Armed could have been answered without the personal attack, IMO. However, looking past it I am thinking that 'Wilfully armed' was suggesting that its better to look at this scenario maturely, not from just sheer reaction in the heat of the situation. Shooting a man in the back will never go down well in any court of law. That was his point and he supports it with where justifiable homicide ends and murder begins. So, in moving one I am proposing that we look at the issue and deal with the issue, not the poster.
Last edited by PrinC; 01-03-2012 at 02:53 PM.