Originally Posted by mountainman13
By that perspective I must assume that you believe ars are responsible for mass shootings. Let's not start blaming guns for user error and really turn this already stupid conversation bad.
And don't give me the glock don't have a safety crap. Glock have 3 safeties.
BTW I'm not a glock fanboy. I love 1911s (when they function).
Let's just have a look what happens during
a Glock Leg occurence, shall we?
-A guy gets his Glock tangled in his CC
holster-safety gets overridden, BLAM-
-A guy puts on his glock, it tangles with
his t-shirt-safety gets overridden, BLAM-
-A guy is pulling his glock out of his CC,
it gets tangled in his shirt-safety gets
-A guy gets his Glock tangled in his
seat belt (?)-safety gets overridden,
yep, you got it, -BLAM-
Now, you can say what you like, but
pistols with redundant safeties have
been around since long before your
little plastic wonder made the scene,
and to date, none of them have been
misfired near the jewels enough nor
had the abysmal safety record, to
spawn the naming of a syndrome:
Get it? Got it? GOOD!
And frankly, why would you.
even try to deflect the blame
of g's piss-poor design upon
the AR industry ?