Thoughts on technique


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Training & Safety > Thoughts on technique

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2013, 05:45 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BlindOldMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
Posts: 268
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default Thoughts on technique

Last week I was at the range and made a deliberate attempt to think about every action as I aimed and fired. There are tons of videos and guides online about proper stance, grip, sighting, etc.. Over years I've tried several things and found a few that worked for me. However, many excellent shooters use different techniques than mine.

Anyhow, I was thinking about a few things in particular that are not often mentioned:

Starting with the stance, I generally shoot from the Weaver or Modified Weaver stance, depending on what I’m firing (i.e., I generally shoot larger calibers from a Modified Weaver stance, but not always) and what I’m trying to accomplish (defensive versus target).

The stance affects several things, most specifically the angle of the strong arm in relation to the torso, the bend of the wrist and the neck.

In the Modified Weaver, the strong arm is fully extended. I most often shoot with the strong arm perpendicular to my torso (think of it as Right Triangle versus Isoceles). This allows the plane of my wrist and arm to be in a single line. If you have taken any karate classes, one of the first things taught is that the plane of the fist is straight with the forearm. This takes advantage of the cushioning cartilage in the wrist to minimize injury. For smaller calibers or infrequent shooters, this might not be an issue at all, but for some who fire thousands of rounds a month, may be relevant. The downside of the fully extended arm and straight wrist is that in order to use traditional sighting technique, the neck often tilts to the side. In order to keep the neck straight as some techniques advice, the angle of the torso to the target must be adjusted by a few degrees. Note that this also affects sighting as I find it more difficult to sight with both eyes open when my neck is titled.

So on to sighting:
I am right-eye dominant but shoot with both hands equally well. If I shoot left handed, I sight with my left eye and vice versa. The corrective lenses that I wear (BlindOldMan wasn’t picked randomly ) preclude normal sighting techniques (hold target fuzzy, front sight in focus) so I’ve been forced to learn stillness tricks in order to hit those barn walls. Sometimes I need to move my head to sight, so in some cases I look like I’m nodding ‘yes’ at the target.

OK, so what’s my point here? When shooting long rifle or longbow, we are often taught to ‘know the nose’. This means knowing where your nose is in relation to your sighting. For example, I was taught to press my cheek against the comb of the stock so that my nose always ends up in the same place. Thought I am relatively new to AR-15 style rifles, I’ve been shown a similar technique where the tip of the nose rests against the charging handle (which may be why I haven’t heard of large caliber AR-15 style rifles, and makes sense if you’ve been “racooned” by some BFG ). In archery, there’s also this notion of knowing the nose so that the sight picture, neck and arm position, etc., are all “known” intuitively (i.e., without looking). There’s no way to develop this except with endless practice, however.

Anyhow, just some thoughts as I was preparing to take a brand new shooter to the range. What do you folks do differently? (The above is not what's "right", just what works for *ME*.


http://www.corneredcat.com/article/the-shooting-basics/stance/

http://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/choosing-a-handgun-shooting-stance/



__________________
BlindOldMan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 11-10-2013, 07:03 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 500
Liked 54 Times on 43 Posts

Default

I guess it depends on what the shooting stance is being used for.

I started with a modified weaver stance when I shot on my own and into the police academy. I had trouble hitting my target so my instructor reviewed my stance and grip and suggested I switch to isosceles. I tried it and it worked great. Then I learned that almost all shooters revert to the isosceles in an actual shooting situation. It also has a huge benefit to solve eye dominance problems such as right handed left eye dominance. Moving is also critical in a real shooting situation and the uneven foot position of the weaver based stances make shuffling side to side more difficult.

For target shooting or hunting or large calibers, weaver might be the best.

I have not put much thought into rifle shooting positions. I put the butt in the shoulder pocket, line up the sights, and squeeze.



__________________
msup752 is offline  
BlindOldMan Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 11:25 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BlindOldMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pembroke Pines,FL
Posts: 268
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by msup752 View Post
I guess it depends on what the shooting stance is being used for.

I started with a modified weaver stance when I shot on my own and into the police academy. I had trouble hitting my target so my instructor reviewed my stance and grip and suggested I switch to isosceles. I tried it and it worked great. Then I learned that almost all shooters revert to the isosceles in an actual shooting situation. It also has a huge benefit to solve eye dominance problems such as right handed left eye dominance. Moving is also critical in a real shooting situation and the uneven foot position of the weaver based stances make shuffling side to side more difficult.
This is extremely interesting and just the sort of feedback I was hoping for. My buddy is trooper in N. Florida. Some of the techniques he has learned are for actual shooting situation (not the scary silhouettes and tin cans that I practice with). They taught isosceles also so it must have merit. It's interesting that none of the target shooters I know use straight isosceles. I'll make it a point to use it for my next few practices.
__________________
BlindOldMan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2013, 11:08 AM   #4
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,314
Liked 2907 Times on 1676 Posts
Likes Given: 1257

Default

Acquiring a good stance is important, but there are instances where the one stance you have practiced with does not work, and you have to adapt.

Practice of other stances introduces one to stance shortcomings and pitfalls. I would rather know them when I am on the range and not have to learn them on the fly in a self defense situation.

Using the same stance on the range to hit the paper targets is not practice, it is a routine to reinforce the basics of shooting.

Using barricades, employing other stances, have varying targets, in all weather conditions is practice.

__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is offline  
BlindOldMan Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2013, 03:14 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 3,084
Liked 2003 Times on 1186 Posts
Likes Given: 961

Default

All of us, regardless of our experience level, must occasionally step back and reevaluate our BASICS. It is easy to coach/instruct others but much harder to do a self assessment, I know, I do it on a regular basis.

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!

JimRau is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2013, 03:30 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9204 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRau View Post
All of us, regardless of our experience level, must occasionally step back and reevaluate our BASICS. It is easy to coach/instruct others but much harder to do a self assessment, I know, I do it on a regular basis.
Truth. I start from the basics every single time I hit the range. Mostly because I don't shoot nearly enough to keep my skills up.

I think the last time I shot was one mag in August.
__________________
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2013, 03:51 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 341
Liked 48 Times on 31 Posts

Default

I have been trying to focus on grip, and breathing to see what works best for me.

__________________
hareebrownbeest is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2013, 06:09 AM   #8
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,314
Liked 2907 Times on 1676 Posts
Likes Given: 1257

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hareebrownbeest View Post
I have been trying to focus on grip, and breathing to see what works best for me.
Add sight alignment and follow through.
__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 02:32 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 3,084
Liked 2003 Times on 1186 Posts
Likes Given: 961

Default

What I have to keep focusing on is finger placement on the trigger and trigger control.
"As fast as you can, but as slow as you have to". I teach this to all!

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!

JimRau is offline  
danf_fl Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2013, 10:01 AM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 2,831
Liked 1768 Times on 989 Posts
Likes Given: 1302

Default

One of the main reasons most LE agencies are teaching the isosceles stance is vest coverage. The Weaver and modified Weaver tend to expose the lighter coverage areas of the lateral chest wall. Isosceles also squares off the trauma plate in a face to face conflict giving a more equal spread of impact forces. As far as isosceles being a stable platform, it is, and it isn't. It may provide a more stable hold for the firearm, but it is not a stable stance for the body as a whole.



__________________
Doc3402 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
The David Lackey Technique JonM Training & Safety 8 01-20-2013 01:39 AM
I Like This Guy's Guitar Technique CA357 The Club House 3 07-25-2011 04:42 PM
S&W Handgun Technique Course DrJason Training & Safety 3 12-15-2009 06:05 PM
Technique McNabb11b General Handgun Discussion 15 02-01-2009 02:02 AM
bumpfire technique carl11acr AR-15 Discussion 17 07-20-2008 06:30 PM