Female firearms officers win 70,000 payout for sex discrimination...


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Training & Safety > Female firearms officers win 70,000 payout for sex discrimination...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2014, 02:21 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,407
Liked 2950 Times on 1472 Posts
Likes Given: 326

Default Female firearms officers win 70,000 payout for sex discrimination...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2561467/Firearms-officer-wins-sex-discrimination-case-against-police-chiefs-gun-big-small-hands.html
Quote:
Two ‘petite’ firearms officers are set to receive a pay-out of £70,000 after winning a sex discrimination case over the size of their big guns.
Victoria Wheatley and Rachael Giles said their weapons were too big for their small hands and as a result they could not reach the trigger, a tribunal has heard.
The two women struggled with the grip of the pistols they were using – a Glock 17 – and they also claimed their heads and legs were too small for their protective gear.
It continues....


I'm not entirely sure how to feel about this.
Is the training staff just a bunch of meanies by setting them up for failure?
Are these girls in over their head? Granted Glocks are kind of a love it or leave it thing, but dang.

If one is so small that none of the gear works for you, perhaps "police officer" isn't a realistic career option.

Seems like there might need to be some something like size limitations as part of the hiring process. It's been done in the past. I suspect that in the name of equality such rules were likely deemed discriminatory and thus illegal.


__________________
Cheers,
Greg
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

"We've replaced what was an exceptional country with a tolerant country. " Greg Gutfeld
Overkill0084 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-23-2014, 02:30 PM   #2
RIP my good and faithful dog.
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
winds-of-change's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 23,224
Liked 7319 Times on 4403 Posts
Likes Given: 8987

Default

I think ANY officer who is qualified enough to be hired for the job, as these women apparently were, should be fitted with equipment in size that works for them. Is there any problem with allowing them to carry smaller service firearms? That being said, I agree with Overkill. If it is not possible to equipment different sized officers with proper equipment, then there should be a height/weight limitation. If it's stated up front on the application, I don't feel it's discriminatory.



__________________
Honor Student: School of Hard Knocks
To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world.
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritatus
winds-of-change is offline  
clr8ter Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 02:53 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,415
Liked 1029 Times on 686 Posts
Likes Given: 679

Default

I agree with both of the above. It's not discriminatory, it's simply the requirements. Man or woman, if they don't meet it, they don't get hired.

Although, what's the problem? I thought England didn't like guns anyway. If no one is allowed to have guns, the cops don't need them, either, right?

__________________
clr8ter is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 03:01 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BillM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Amity
Posts: 1,017
Liked 208 Times on 114 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Becoming a "Firearms Officer" in England is a step above regular police
officers--who are not armed. Think of it as becoming a SWAT team member
or an Army Ranger.

If they wash out because they can't handle the equipment--so be it.

My wife has the smallest hands I've ever seen on an adult human. Shops
for gloves in the kid's section. Until she got her M&P Pro 9L, she shot a
Glock 17 quite well in USPSA competition.

__________________
BillM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 03:15 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,407
Liked 2950 Times on 1472 Posts
Likes Given: 326

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillM View Post
Becoming a "Firearms Officer" in England is a step above regular police
officers--who are not armed. Think of it as becoming a SWAT team member
or an Army Ranger.

If they wash out because they can't handle the equipment--so be it.

My wife has the smallest hands I've ever seen on an adult human. Shops
for gloves in the kid's section. Until she got her M&P Pro 9L, she shot a
Glock 17 quite well in USPSA competition.
After 9-11 "Firearms officers" became much more common. Prior to that, they were somewhat rare. A couple months after 9-11, I was astounded to see constables at Heathrow carrying MP5s. I'd never actually seen an armed British policeman at all prior to that. (FWIW, I was stationed in the UK from 98 to 03)

While not having the experience, I suspected that someone with small hands could manage a Glock 17, if not exactly love it. It's nice to see it confirmed.
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

"We've replaced what was an exceptional country with a tolerant country. " Greg Gutfeld
Overkill0084 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 03:17 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,415
Liked 1029 Times on 686 Posts
Likes Given: 679

Default

LOL. SWAT? How do they do it in England? Throw tea cups? Well, if the "Petite" ladies wash out, maybe they can go to Japan and try to become Sumo Wrestlers…..

__________________
clr8ter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 05:45 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lima,Ohio
Posts: 2,968
Liked 2605 Times on 1176 Posts
Likes Given: 2526

Default

Ok, these ladies find themselves in a fire fight. The only weapons left with ammo are the ones they pick up from dead bad guys. There are still bad guys shooting at them. But now they can't fight back because the guns they picked up are to big for them. If you are to small to use the equipment, then you can't do the job. It's the reason there aren't any midgets in pro basket ball. The courts aren't doing these women any favors by putting them into a situation they can't handle.

__________________
rjd3282 is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 06:22 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,250
Liked 390 Times on 253 Posts
Likes Given: 1400

Default

They are obviously unqualified but UK laws forced their hiring anyway.
We see some of this over here as well, though, and this may be hard to believe for some, the PC crowd holds even bigger sway over there and the most unbelievable absurdities are gospel in the UK, even more than here.

__________________
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Primary Rifle:
LWRC M6A2 w/ Eotech512

Primary Handgun:
Ruger GP100 Royal Phoenix
bluez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 06:54 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
manta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK.
Posts: 1,592
Liked 459 Times on 315 Posts
Likes Given: 140

Default

I am not sure what to think, if they are qualified to do the job could a handgun with a smaller grip be issued. Or if they can't use the equipment issued to other officers should they not be employed. All police are armed in this part of the UK men and women, and they carry Glocks. I haven't heard it being an issue.

Quote:
LOL. SWAT? How do they do it in England? Throw tea cups?
No they use these.
1282552264.jpg   armed-response-unit-psni.jpg   ay_114114681.jpg   security_2592868b.jpg  
__________________

Last edited by manta; 02-23-2014 at 07:05 PM.
manta is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 08:07 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,250
Liked 390 Times on 253 Posts
Likes Given: 1400

Default

The state is armed to the teeth while the citizens are helpless during the riots.
And there will be more riots forthcoming and even mo vicious ones:

Here is some of that b;leeding heart nonsense of what "caused" the riots. "Too many social services cutbacks"
http://metro.co.uk/2013/08/05/new-riots-only-a-matter-of-time-author-warns-3912005/

Here is a better evaluation:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/katharinebirbalsingh/100099830/these-riots-were-about-race-why-ignore-the-fact/

And here is what awaits the UK and us in the none-too-distant future:
http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/bracken-when-the-music-stops-how-americas-cities-may-explode-in-violence/



__________________
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Primary Rifle:
LWRC M6A2 w/ Eotech512

Primary Handgun:
Ruger GP100 Royal Phoenix
bluez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Man suing gun range for Ladies Day discrimination rocshaman The Club House 16 08-23-2012 02:46 PM
Steel Chellenge with Lewis Class Payout LubeckTech Ohio Gun Forum 0 06-30-2012 02:05 PM
How the release of trace info on firearms could put police officers at risk Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 1 03-30-2011 07:45 PM
Florida Gender Discrimination? PTsouthpaw Legal and Activism 8 01-22-2011 01:27 PM
firearms discrimination peachga Politics, Religion and Controversy 27 03-27-2009 06:45 PM