Self Defense Shot Placement
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > Survival & Sustenance Living Forum > Self Defense Shot Placement

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2008, 09:47 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default Self Defense Shot Placement

Okay, in the THIS thread, we will be discussing what does and what does not work for shot placement in a defensive, real world situation.

Our other thread was visited by an expert trainer, Rob Pincus, and a discussion outside of the thread subject bled over. Let's not let that happen again.

While you may or may not think that the involvement of one person is important, having a professional trainer of armed combatants stop by our forum and contribute his years of knowledge is valuable and relevant to a large cross section of the membership board.

If you can't keep your personal feelings about another member out of your posts, take it to a personal PM, take it to The Bunker, or log off and chill the F**K out.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but because you don't agree with their opinion doesn't give you license to run roughshod over the thread in pursuit of your personal vendetta.

Please keep it civil -

JD

__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 09-20-2008, 09:58 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

Honor the Men, Challenge the Material

A very good article by Rob Pincus on Questioning The World of Wisdom in Firearm's Training. Worth the time to read, I assure you...

JD
__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2008, 10:48 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
matt g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Center mass allows for easiest shot placement under duress and as such, increases the chances of a fatal shot.

Only movie stars take head shots.

__________________

"'Did you ever wonder why we had to run for shelter when the promise of a brave new world unfurled beneath a clear blue sky? "
Roger Waters

Vote freedom, join the Libertarian Party.

matt g is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2008, 11:42 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

I concur with you Matt - I still advocate centering the weapon and unleashing as many rounds as it takes to end the threat at hand.

Science has proven that each person addresses threats differently, and most people will only be able to process and respond to a single threat at a time.

While it's nice and fine to think you will be Tom Cruise in Collateral, while in the alleyway, snap drawing your holsted weapon and putting down two bad guys in the blink of an eye - Your average person isn't going to be able that without a lot of training.

Shoot to end the threat at hand, reassess/reload and proceed. It's all that I practice...

JD

__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 12:32 AM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mark F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bedford Texas
Posts: 2,865
Liked 54 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

In conjunction with the above, I regurarly practice Intuitive Shooting from various positions such as sitting and crouching. You also need to get proficient in one hand shooting, both left & right.

__________________
*** Don't Mess With TEXAS ***
Μολὼν λάβε
Mark F is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 01:04 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SGT-MILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,354
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Practice as many different scenarios as you can. One handed shooting, shooting while lying down, shooting while moving forwards/backwards/side to side, shooting while wounded, etc............

Think of as many scenarios as you can and practice them. This will help open your mind to the different things that can happen out there.

I do this with my security defense team at my squadron. We will spend hours just going over different scenarios, and practicing everything from simple engagements to worst-case scenarios with multiple casualties, weapons problems, bad envoirnments, communications failures, etc........

Another good mental note I learned from my weapons instructor early in my military career.

"Accuracy over speed, regardless."

__________________
SGT-MILLER is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 04:58 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Default

Dillinger, Thanks Much.

Guys, in accordance with the thoughts in my article (linked above), the last thing I want is for my opinion to be put up on a magic pedestal. It should be taken from the perspective that it comes..... which includes over a decade of familiarity with the source information that RL357 was resting his position on.

I received a very cool note via PM from RL where he was making sure that I knew that he wasn't trying to offend me in his post. No problem there.

Back on topic, for those who were following the other thread, this is what I sent to him:

Quote:
The only other thing I was going to share with you was that my point was specifically about the .380 Glaser load.... I am absolutely sure that they did not find 500 actual shootings with that load. You have to understand the source... they compared the results of the .380 Glaser to the results in GELATIN of another round that they did have 500 actual shootings with. Most of the rounds that they had that many cases for were the rounds that are most popular in LE and Mil over the last 50 years.
At first, I too thought this was a great idea..... over the intervening years, I've come to change my mind about it.

I've come to the conclusion that it is more important to choose a gun/caliber combo based on your ability to shoot it first, carry it second and enjoy it third. After that, shoot until they are down as best you can!

In fact, the above paragraph is a summation of 50% (or more) of my book!... so you just saved some money and time, if you were considering reading it .

-Rob
__________________
I.C.E. Training Company
Rob Pincus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 10:18 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 578
Default

Mr. Pincus going on the assumption that you've at some point in your career you've done at least some study on the effectiveness of various rounds and the wounds they have inflicted and or discussed the issue with those that may have studied it .

Do you have any data/knowledge of which type of wound was the most effectively produced by what ammo/caliber and which is the most consistently effective in ending a persons actions ?

To put it another way

Is there any data to find out if more assailants are being stopped by wounds that have caused

A) Blood loss
B) Paralysis being inflicted or
C) some other factor such as shock from being shot or perhaps cowardice in the face of a fight "include immediately killed with the first round/s fired here"

What style of rounds if any have penetrated deep enough to cause trauma if not a break in the spine and have done so consistently through various clothing including heavy leather jackets ?

Are hollow points more effective than say a sharp shouldered semiwadcutter at causing blood loss assuming placement is the same .

Putting concern for unintended secondary targets aside for a moment . Do "pass troughs" seem to stop a person quicker than a round that stops in the body assuming placement is good and the same say a lung hit ?

Also have there been any studies that might help to determine what types of criminals have proven to be the most motivated and dangerous to the public and willing to engage in a armed fight ?

For instance would a group or single home invader "one who knows a home is occupied at the time of entry" be more likely to engage in a gunfight rather than run than say a armed street mugger ?

Thank you for your input

__________________
BigO01 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 12:34 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mark F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bedford Texas
Posts: 2,865
Liked 54 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Shot placement would be nice... but in the heat of battle raw firepower will be your friend.

__________________
*** Don't Mess With TEXAS ***
Μολὼν λάβε
Mark F is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 02:05 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Default

BIg,

Lots of BIG questions there.... not all on topic here, but I can answer:


I don't think that there is much point is trying to predict behavior (such as propensity for attack or "shock factor" after being shot). None of it can be counted on and so it shouldn't make any difference in your preparation or actual defense. Deviants that commit crimes are deviant. There is no doubt that more people use firearms for defense in their homes, but that is probably more a matter of convenience and access not a demonstration of criminal intent in that environment.


Because human physiology is pretty fragile and I haven't seen a big difference in the calibers/bullets most people carry (38-357,9-40-45), I don't really distinguish between them much. We did a DVD last year with a penetration demonstration section that showed what bullets would be likely to do if you shot them in your typically constructed home and they missed, as far as penetration through walls/rooms. Lots of people didn't like the findings because they misinterpreted what my point was. Just because we showed that Glasers and birdshot penetrated dramaticallly less through a home, didn't necessarily mean that we were advocating their use.

People want easy answers..... but there aren't any. Defensive firearms are going to be a compromise between ease of use, reliability, convenience of carry, recoil management, capacity, downrange power, price and a host of other factors. That is okay..... get a good gun and practice, don't expect to hedge your bets much with a special gun or bullet.

-RJP

__________________
I.C.E. Training Company
Rob Pincus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Would you have shot this guy? cbw Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 22 07-16-2009 11:42 AM
WWB JHP for self defense? Megaton Ammunition & Reloading 12 05-08-2009 02:13 PM
Shot Placement? number1 Survival & Sustenance Living Forum 56 09-20-2008 09:36 PM
I shot my new .22........... Bob Wright Revolver Handguns 0 09-08-2008 03:27 PM
7 shot cylinder in a 6 shot course of fire fitzy Revolver Handguns 1 01-31-2008 11:07 PM