Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Discussion Forums > Survival & Sustenance Living Forum > .308 Single-shot?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2011, 02:17 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default .308 Single-shot?

I am quite proficient with my handguns and those are my primary defensive options. I want to make it clear that I didn't buy either of these rifles as "combat" or "SHTF" guns, and they are primarily for recreation. I am obviously not expecting to be running around fighting bandits or zombies, or I'd have myself an AR isntead :P . I am just looking for your opinions on the old "if I had to grab just one as I head out the door at TEOTWAWKI" question, since this is what I've got on hand (and I don't intend to change that any time soon).

So, here are the options:

1) The Marlin 795. Just a basic semi-auto, 10rd mag-fed .22lr rifle. I only have one magazine for it.

2) A .308 Single Shot. It is an H&R Bull-barrel model with the barrel shortened to 16.25", so it's OAL is about 27".

Both include slings, optics, and bipods, and both are capable of 2" groups at 100 yards, and head-shots at 200 yards (after I figure out hold-over with the .22, heh).

BIG SIDE NOTE: I handload all my ammo, and can load anything from a 150gr @ 2500fps (not loaded to the max for the sake of noise with the short barrel), down to a 110gr@1000fps. So, this .308 setup is perfectly capable of everything from rabits to elk to 2-legged threats.

It would be a very rare and unique situation in which I'd reach for either rifle over my defensive handgun(s) for any immediate threats to my life. However, the option is always there. If, say, I'm defending a fixed location, I'm thinking I'd rather have the ability to fire one devastating round at a target outside the window before transitioning back to my pistol or ducking back to reload, than the ability to pop off a few .22s at a time that have a much lower chance of quickly stopping the threat. Not to mention, if the threat is halfway behind cover (shooting out of a window, for example), that window frame isn't going to stop a .308 like it would a .22.

Of course, there are the obvious practical advantages to the .22 rifle. The rapid-fire option means (most importantly to me) that I could give the weapon to even modestly-trained shooters, and they'd have 10 chances to at least make a hit or even just keep an attacker's head down a little longer. That is, they could guard a back door or help put fire on a single threat, and their skill in manipulation . Next, the small ammo means it is almost a 10:1 ratio of .22 vs .308, as far as carrying-capacity. And that, coupled with the ammo availability, is a plus; if I had to bug out and only brought 10 or 20 of those lower-recoil .308 cartridges, that's pretty much all I'd ever get.

However, how big are the .22's advantages over the power of a .308? I'm leaning toward the .308 as my "go to" rifle, especially given that even in "normal" hunting or outdoors situations, with my handloads, it is capable of taking a far wider variety of game and at far longer distances than a .22. And then, from an antipersonell perspective, I think it nicely complements a high-capacity handgun, at least better than a .22 rifle does. Not to mention, the single-shot is pretty much guaranteed to go bang when I drop the hammer, whereas the .22 is not nearly that reliable.

What do you guys think?

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 09-30-2011, 04:48 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
hiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cleator,AZ
Posts: 3,259
Liked 698 Times on 448 Posts
Likes Given: 226

Default

As long as you asked for an opinion here is my 2 cents.
I think all handguns are for emergency use only. The primary weapon for defense or offense should always be a rifle. Why do you think all military are given rifles? Professional hunters use rifles. A rifle in a medium power center-fire caliber. Repeater, with a preference of a reliable semi-automatic action. I carry a handgun only because it is hard to conceal a rifle. I think you should consider the purchase of a rifle. A 22 rifle is great for hunting but that is about it. Your single-shot rifle would be fine for hunting but not for defense/offense.

__________________

Just walking on the edge of of my grave.

hiwall is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 01:39 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

I know all about the notion of "fighting your way to a rifle," and I understand the vast superiority of rifles over handguns in both power and especially controllability. But, rifles are for offensive roles. I.E. you pick up a rifle when you are going to potential trouble or going to hunt something. You grab for your handgun when trouble comes to you by surprise. For me, 98% of the time I'd only have access to my handguns anyways because, as you say, rifles are hard to conceal and usually stay hidden away. Thus, because I don't have any offensive needs, I don't particularly focus on rifles when I could spend that money on additional training and practice with my handguns. If I had unlimited funds, yeah I'd have picked up an M1A over a single-shot, but I don't so I didn't .

I'm not asking whether or not I think there are better rifles for zombies than what I have. I said that in the first paragraph . I'm just asking which everyone would prefer to have of the two.

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 02:35 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9199 Times on 5056 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

At the given moment, I would likely pick (since we are limited to those 2 choices) whichever one I had more ammo for on hand. Given broader choices I wouldn't pick either one, but an M1A like you mentioned, but money is an issue for me. That's it. And yes a rifle is offensive or defensive weapon, not offensive only. They simply have more power, more accuracy, and for some people they are easier to aim and gain a good sight picture. I would rather carry an M4 or AR15 everywhere, but it's inconvenient.

But, with the 2 above choices, whichever you have more ammo for. It wouldn't be fun to have to lug around all your reloading equipment either.

__________________
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 03:40 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Caoimhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Rio Rancho,47th
Posts: 157
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Well if one of your hand guns is a nice 22lr pistol like a Buck Mark then I would have no problem with the 308. My 308 is a 3 shot bolt action and I'm keeping it with me.

__________________
Caoimhin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 03:51 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Ive actually been thinking about selling my p22 and getting a buckmark, heh.

Interesting, though. So youd pick the 22 over the 308 because of the amount of ammo I could carry? Because I dont imagine id carry more than maybe 40 rounds if I ever had to bug out, just because 40 rounds is a lot of ammo for a single-shot that isnt a prinary weapon.

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 03:58 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9199 Times on 5056 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindenwood View Post
Ive actually been thinking about selling my p22 and getting a buckmark, heh.

Interesting, though. So youd pick the 22 over the 308 because of the amount of ammo I could carry? Because I dont imagine id carry more than maybe 40 rounds if I ever had to bug out, just because 40 rounds is a lot of ammo for a single-shot that isnt a prinary weapon.
but when your talking about .22, why carry 40 when you can throw a 550 round brick in your pack? Hunting small game and a .22 rifle will outshine a pistol. If your bugged out, and on the move, in the wilds, some squirrel stew is mighty fine eating. And it is possible to take a larger animal like a deer, with perfect/lucky shot placement. aim for the eyeball.
__________________
trip286 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 01:38 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: WNC
Posts: 397
Liked 136 Times on 65 Posts
Likes Given: 29

Default

Here's what I did with an H&R for a "survival rifle" for hikes and camping.

__________________
Seven is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 02:06 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Oh nice!! Those are some neat ideas.


Now I want a buckmark though, heh.

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 02:56 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
erikthebald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Denver,Colorado
Posts: 115
Default Between the two

I'd grab that semi auto .22

No, a .22lr doesn't have a lot of stopping power. But, consider the psychological aspect. Any fire coming from the front is going to stop all but the most determined of attackers.

Under fire = take cover.

In a defensive situation, I'd much rather have a handful of little .22s headed down range towards any menacing Tangos than a single.308.

That'll be $0.02.

__________________

Inventory:
AK-74
M1911-A1
CETME .308 Sporter
Sig SP2022
Ruger 10/22
Hi-Standard Duramatic M-101
H&R 1874 12 Guage
Mosin Nagant M91/30
K-98 Mauser
Ithaca M-66

“It's too easy sometimes to give in to despair, unless, of course, you’re talking about politics, in which case you don't really have any other option.” Mike Littwin

erikthebald is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Single shot enthusiast? cafsman General Rifle Discussion 7 01-17-2011 10:15 PM
No respect for a single shot Flint Rock General Shotgun Discussion 2 10-02-2010 11:35 PM
Single Shot Pistol lukeisme Blackpowder & Musket 2 01-01-2010 09:18 PM
H&R 20 ga. single shot question robbo60 General Shotgun Discussion 9 06-16-2009 12:51 PM
Single shot for hunting? flbandit General Rifle Discussion 21 10-08-2008 11:54 AM