Originally Posted by bowhunter17
am in an argument with a vegetarian that thinks that humans don't need meat anymore and that animals have a right to live and get scared and get hurt when they are shot. I have already explained to her carrying capacity and what happens when the carrying capacity overflows due to lack of hunting. I need some help to win this argument.
I think your probably pissing into the wind on this one. Arguing with most liberals is an exercise in futility, more often than not.
"don't need to eat meat anymore": Implies that we needed to at one point. Why quit?
Animal rights: No such thing. If the predator doesn't comprehend the right of the deer to live, is there an appeal process?
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member
Liberals are constantly telling us about the poor and oppressed in this country. With that in mind, why do they feel the need to keep importing poor people from other countries?