Originally Posted by bowhunter17
am in an argument with a vegetarian that thinks that humans don't need meat anymore and that animals have a right to live and get scared and get hurt when they are shot. I have already explained to her carrying capacity and what happens when the carrying capacity overflows due to lack of hunting. I need some help to win this argument.
I think your probably pissing into the wind on this one. Arguing with most liberals is an exercise in futility, more often than not.
"don't need to eat meat anymore": Implies that we needed to at one point. Why quit?
Animal rights: No such thing. If the predator doesn't comprehend the right of the deer to live, is there an appeal process?