Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Hunting Forum > 25-06 or 270 wsm?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old01-27-2012, 07:43 PM #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: estevan, saskatchewan canada
Posts: 6
Default25-06 or 270 wsm?

wondering which is a better rifle.. looking to shoot 120 gr out of a tikka t3 in 25-06. not sure if it will stabilize the heavier projectile... any input on the subject would be much help. it is a 1 in 10" twist. thanks guys
djchoma is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old01-28-2012, 12:10 PM #2
Is Still Confused
 
theropinfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hooper, Utah
Posts: 512
Default

I shoot 120 nosler partition's in my 25-06. 1-10 twist as well. Stabilizes just fine. Killed 3 deer and 1 elk with it. Shoots sub-moa.

Never messed with a .270 short. I know some guys that love em. I still think they're just a fad.
__________________
Wait, was this thing on?

Last edited by theropinfool; 01-28-2012 at 03:10 PM.
theropinfool is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-18-2012, 05:51 PM #3
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 81
Default

Either one is a good choice, but the .25-06 would be cheaper to purchase factory ammo for, easier to find ammo for, and even cheaper to reload for. Your 1:10 twist shouldn't have any trouble stabilizing the 120gr projectiles. The 120gr Partition makes for a great elk load for it too.

The WSM is a flat shooting, hard hitting round. The biggest drawback that I see for the .270WSM is the limited choices of bullets for reloading. A 7mmWSM or 300WSM would be (IMHO) much better choices if you reload simply due to the much wider selection of reloading components available in those calibers.
stick_man is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-19-2012, 10:11 AM #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stick_man View Post
The biggest drawback that I see for the .270WSM is the limited choices of bullets for reloading. A 7mmWSM or 300WSM would be (IMHO) much better choices if you reload simply due to the much wider selection of reloading components available in those calibers.
With the possible exception of match bullets, what bullet isn't available in .270? What hunting situation can't be addressed?
natman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-19-2012, 10:27 AM #5
Moderator
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin, Texas, by God!!
Posts: 6,061
Default

The .25-06 is something of a wonder caliber. I do not know anyone with one that will not shoot outstanding groups. I am unable to load a bad round for mine. 120's will shoot fine in a 1/10 and work well for anything short of moose and bear.
__________________
In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-19-2012, 12:57 PM #6
Crazy Azz Redneck
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,831
Default

I don't shoot many 120gr's out of mine.They shoot good,but my barrel loves to shoot 115gr Berger VLD's and Nosler Combined Technology 115gr Silvertips.

It shoots 1 hole groups with those bullets,and performs well on game.
Txhillbilly is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-19-2012, 01:39 PM #7
Senior Member
 
axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Elkhart, Texas
Posts: 3,318
Likes Given: 7

Default

if having to make a choice and i could be biased as i own a 25-06, and have had several over the years, i would choose it over the 270WSM. the 270WSM has a little performance edge over the 25-06, but the 25-06 has been around for many years and is just a proven performer. personally i am just not a big fan of the short mag cartridges, as i am more traditional and prefer the older calibers. but it's just a personal preference and nothing in the fact that the short mags aren't good cartridges.
axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-20-2012, 12:30 AM #8
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by natman View Post
With the possible exception of match bullets, what bullet isn't available in .270? What hunting situation can't be addressed?
Well, it seems like just about every manufacturer makes at least one bullet weight for the .270 but not many make more than 2. Seems like the only weights I have seen for them have been 130gr and 150gr from most manufacturers. I don't have a .270, so it has been a while since I have looked. The selection may be increasing a little lately due to the new calibers being on the market (.270WSM and 6.8Spc?)

Compare that to the offerings in .25 caliber and you will see a substantial difference. (Could it be due to the many different .25 caliber cartridges?) One other major advantage to the .25-06... ever try making a .270WSM out of VERY COMMON .30-06 brass? It is a very easy task for the .25-06.

While I said there are many more options with the .25-06 than the .270WSM, I will not argue the capabilities of the .270 or the .270WSM. They are so close performancewise to the .25-06 that you really couldn't go wrong with either. I do feel, however, that the .270WSM will turn out to be a fad cartridge that will not gain long-term popularity.

These comments are strictly based on MY experiences and observations with them. Your experiences will likely vary greatly from mine.
stick_man is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old02-20-2012, 12:43 AM #9
Senior Member
 
axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Elkhart, Texas
Posts: 3,318
Likes Given: 7

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stick_man View Post
Well, it seems like just about every manufacturer makes at least one bullet weight for the .270 but not many make more than 2. Seems like the only weights I have seen for them have been 130gr and 150gr from most manufacturers. I don't have a .270, so it has been a while since I have looked. The selection may be increasing a little lately due to the new calibers being on the market (.270WSM and 6.8Spc?)

Compare that to the offerings in .25 caliber and you will see a substantial difference. (Could it be due to the many different .25 caliber cartridges?) One other major advantage to the .25-06... ever try making a .270WSM out of VERY COMMON .30-06 brass? It is a very easy task for the .25-06.

While I said there are many more options with the .25-06 than the .270WSM, I will not argue the capabilities of the .270 or the .270WSM. They are so close performancewise to the .25-06 that you really couldn't go wrong with either. I do feel, however, that the .270WSM will turn out to be a fad cartridge that will not gain long-term popularity.

These comments are strictly based on MY experiences and observations with them. Your experiences will likely vary greatly from mine.
with some of the newer cartridge offerings in the 270 calibers, the range from around 100-170gr bullets in many different types and flavors. the 270 has expanded in bullet selection in the last several years. this is a good time to own and reload in the 270 calibers.
axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes




FOLLOW US ON
PHOTO OF THE DAY
SA1911A1 & Ruger Mark II Target & my range box



Network: Kel Tec Forum - Airsoft Forum - Hipoint Firearms Forum - Glock Forum - Marlin Forum