Taking A Couple Inches Off Their Barrels To Get A Tax Stamp To Avoid The Gun Ban?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion > Taking A Couple Inches Off Their Barrels To Get A Tax Stamp To Avoid The Gun Ban?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2013, 01:09 PM   #1
Concealed Carry Instructor
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 2,008
Liked 946 Times on 622 Posts
Likes Given: 229

Default Taking A Couple Inches Off Their Barrels To Get A Tax Stamp To Avoid The Gun Ban?

How Many People are Taking A Couple Inches Off Their Barrels To Get A Tax Stamp To Avoid The Gun Ban?

A local news show did a story on a machine shop that was converting any rifle to a short barreled riffle in compliance with the class 3 laws, to get around a possible gun ban. The owner quit his other full time job because he has so many orders for business he could not keep up at part time. He is also opening another custom shop in another town.

Is this a good idea, to buy the tax stamps to beat the feds at their own game?

I already have a 14.5" barrel on an AR with a soldered on long flash hider. A regular flash hider would be an easy upgrade to class 3 if I did the paperwork first and paid the ransom of $200.

__________________
AR10 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-12-2013, 01:46 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
potentialglock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,160
Liked 160 Times on 113 Posts

Default

How does this keep it off the list for a gun ban?

__________________
potentialglock is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 03:31 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
Liked 37 Times on 24 Posts
Likes Given: 24

Default

That's very interesting. I would like a little more info on that too.

__________________
blindshooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 06:18 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

It seems like that would be out of the frying pan into the fire to me.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
slewfoot Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 03:43 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TNFrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: TN. U.S.A.
Posts: 293
Liked 125 Times on 68 Posts
Likes Given: 130

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CA357 View Post
It seems like that would be out of the frying pan into the fire to me.
Ditto, you have to apply for and receive the Tax Stamp FIRST before you do any modifications to the gun. Also, to get this stamp you have to jump through a bunch of hoops like asking permission of the Chief Law Enforcement Agent of your area, send in a Finger Print Card to the ATF and summit to a background check along with paying your $200.
This is basically all the crazy stuff that they want to make law for ownership of what are now legal semi-autos that only currently require a Form 4473 and Brady Check so why do their job for em'. Wait for it to happen before you volunteer to do it.
__________________
http://www.infowars.com/
Member: Gun Owners of America
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here!
This is the War Room!"
TNFrank is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 07:02 AM   #6
Lifetime Supporting Member
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Vikingdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains,CA
Posts: 13,946
Liked 8259 Times on 4771 Posts
Likes Given: 10674

Default

Wouldn't you be better off if you lost your guns in some sort of boating accident at sea and report them lost? Personally I would rather have to report my guns lost (not stolen) than to have to jump through all of those hoops and register the gun, have to pay the tax stamp, and then the mothereffing Feds come and confiscate them down the road anyhow. That would suck.

















Whats this? My AR wasn't lost at sea it was just misplaced in the back of my sock drawer? Now how on Earth did I miss it there!

__________________

Shoot me an email at vikingdad995@gmail.com

Check out the Firearmstalk Podcasts with Vikingdad and DrFootball! https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/firearms-talk-podcast/id778007899

Quote:
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
- Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography, page 446.
Vikingdad is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 07:13 AM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
John_Deer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,067
Liked 1577 Times on 1075 Posts
Likes Given: 544

Default

A good one is you leaned the camo AR-15 against a tree to free a hand to relieve yourself. You got caught up in nature. 10 minutes later you could not find your gun. They don't have to know the tree is in the back yard.

__________________

Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety - Plato

John_Deer is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 03:34 PM   #8
Lifetime Supporting Member
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Vikingdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains,CA
Posts: 13,946
Liked 8259 Times on 4771 Posts
Likes Given: 10674

Default

Currently there is no law requiring that you record the serial numbers and descriptions of the firearms you lose- so as long as you do not try to collect an insurance claim on firearms that may later be found, there is no harm no foul that I can see.

__________________

Shoot me an email at vikingdad995@gmail.com

Check out the Firearmstalk Podcasts with Vikingdad and DrFootball! https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/firearms-talk-podcast/id778007899

Quote:
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
- Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography, page 446.
Vikingdad is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 04:04 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
John_Deer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,067
Liked 1577 Times on 1075 Posts
Likes Given: 544

Default

I wonder how many firearms were reported as lost when the Canadians tried to register all guns? Not to mention the rural sheriffs departments that did not have the manpower to keep up a registry.

__________________

Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety - Plato

John_Deer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 04:16 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 498
Liked 54 Times on 43 Posts

Default

MI requires lost guns to be reported. The serial numbers are entered in NCIC so if they are checked, it will show the firearm lost.

__________________
msup752 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
9x19mm case length in inches JTJ Ammunition & Reloading 12 12-17-2012 08:21 PM
First NFA Tax Stamp!! JonM NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion 14 02-07-2012 02:59 AM
Class 3 tax stamp gumby NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion 17 06-11-2010 04:53 PM
Short Barrels/Long Barrels,I can't make up my mind ninjatoth Revolver Handguns 9 10-23-2009 07:59 AM