 |
|
03-15-2012, 09:00 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
|
Ar-15
I have a DPMS upper receiver and a Spikes lower end and it has the option of a 3-Round burst on it. I was wanting to know the legal side of that and where to possible find the kit to have it done. . . Possible a cost also.?
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 09:12 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 848
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
I think that symbol on the Spikes lowers over where "sprinkle" is located is just for looks. A standard LPK will only allow for the "SAFE" and "FIRE" positions to work on your selector switch. No it isn't legal to try and convert an AR-15 to "AUTO" or "BURST". Obviously, they don't sell kits to do such things and ATF takes a dim view of anyone who tries to do such.
An M-16 or M4 would probably run around $10,000 if you were able to purchase one from a FFL Class III dealer who had one. That's after you did all the ATF paperwork just to own it.
__________________
Fear is a Reaction..............Courage is a Decision
Last edited by Snakedriver; 03-15-2012 at 10:25 PM.
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 10:21 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
|
Lesson learned, preshate it..!
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 10:41 PM
|
#4
|
|
Game on...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,682
Liked 692 Times on 400 Posts Likes Given: 364
|
The burst mode is only there for show and the receiver is not machined to accept full auto parts. Even if it were the manufacturing and even possession of an unregistered full auto AR would cost you several years in a Federal prison and tens of thousands in fines. Class III firearms are available but their limited availability makes them very pricey.
__________________
"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 11:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 2,169
Liked 45 Times on 32 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Yeah...you convert one to full auto you better stock up on soap on a rope.
__________________
What part of 'shall not be infringed' confuses people?
|
|
|
03-17-2012, 12:36 AM
|
#6
|
|
Addicted
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 244
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
It is a nice little tease isn't it though...
|
|
|
03-17-2012, 04:23 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains,CA
Posts: 7,462
Liked 2522 Times on 1550 Posts Likes Given: 2538
|
I thought all of the parts were available for burst and full auto conversions and the only illegal thing was if you actually installed them in your rifle. Am I totally wrong about that?
|
|
|
03-17-2012, 04:41 AM
|
#8
|
|
Game on...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,682
Liked 692 Times on 400 Posts Likes Given: 364
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikingdad
I thought all of the parts were available for burst and full auto conversions and the only illegal thing was if you actually installed them in your rifle. Am I totally wrong about that?
|
Possssion of an autosear and certain trigger control parts that can be installed in an AR is considered to be possession of a machine gun whether or not they are actually installed, unless you already own a NFA weapon and have the proper tax stamp.
Quote:
"Regardless of the date of manufacture of a drop in auto sear, possession of such a sear and certain M-16 fire control parts is possession of a machinegun as defined by the NFA. Specifically, these parts are listed as “(a) combination(s) of parts” designed “Solely and exclusively” for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun and are a machinegun as defined in the NFA." ATF machinegun technology letters written between 1980 and 1996 by Edward M. Owen – the then-chief of the ATF technology division defined “solely and exclusively” in all of his published and unpublished machinegun rulings with specific non-ambiguous language.
Owning the parts needed to assemble other NFA firearms is generally restricted. An individual cannot own or manufacture certain machine gun sear (fire-control) components unless he owns a registered machine gun.
|
__________________
"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington
Last edited by Jpyle; 03-17-2012 at 01:08 PM.
|
|
|
03-17-2012, 05:33 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains,CA
Posts: 7,462
Liked 2522 Times on 1550 Posts Likes Given: 2538
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpyle
Possssion of an autosear and certain trigger control parts that can be installed in an AR is considered to be possession of a machine gun whether or not they are actually installed, unless you alreay own a NFA weapon and have the proper tax stamp.
|
Oh. OK then. How can that be determined then? Is the autosear and the trigger control parts identified by serial numbers or something?
I live in CA so it is illegal in any case for me to own any of this stuff, but I once heard... and you know where that leads.
|
|
|
03-17-2012, 12:09 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 848
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Along with a bunch of internal part differences between the AR-15 and the M-16/M4, there are also certain differences in the lower receiver between the semi-auto and the select fire weapons. It is not as simple as just having the parts ready to drop-in. Once the modifications necessary are made to the lower receiver, it becomes very apparent to LEO's and ATF's whether the gun is capable of semi or auto fire.
Anyone considering an attemp to gather and own the conversion parts should seriously reconsider unless they want to go do some serious time in the big house.
"From: [49 U.S.C. 781-788, 26 U.S.C. 5861, 26 U.S.C. 5872]
Violators may be fined not more than $250,000, and imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. In addition, any vessel, vehicle or aircraft used to transport, conceal or possess an unregistered NFA firearm is subject to seizure and forfeiture, as is the weapon itself."
__________________
Fear is a Reaction..............Courage is a Decision
Last edited by Snakedriver; 03-17-2012 at 12:19 PM.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|