Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Curio & Relic Discussion > Why Didnt the US Military Care About "Matching" Guns??

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2012, 06:17 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Trez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 3-P
Posts: 3,608
Liked 692 Times on 459 Posts
Likes Given: 702

Default Why Didnt the US Military Care About "Matching" Guns??

Why is there such a big concern for "matching" foreign military guns, but to find a US mil-surp that is matching is near impossible (If you can even tell)?

It just seems strange to me that the US would care less about their guns than, say, Russia... Even the lowly Mosin has all its parts numbered, but a '03 or a M1 doesnt??



__________________
Quote:
...... I suffer from a very rare genetic defect that causes me to be sympathetic toward the International cause. There is no cure.
Trez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 09-09-2012, 08:29 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chainfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,257
Liked 1081 Times on 699 Posts
Likes Given: 273

Default

This is my theory, I am sure others will follow:

Most Mosins are matched only after refurbishment from parts of different makers and over a long time period. So they are not really matching at all. After the refurbishment they were renumbered to match. The Russians and the Soviets were really big into keeping Ivan honest, and responsible for maintaing state owned equipment, and not letting him steal his buddies bolt after he lost it in the snow; an action that could get a summary execution.

In the American army, if you lost a part, you would get a ass-reaming and the part would be replaced, so not as much effort was put into numbering.



__________________

"It is better to be too skeptical then too credulous"

Carl Sagan

Chainfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 09:24 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 16,308
Liked 8373 Times on 3623 Posts
Likes Given: 1288

Default

We attempted to avoid swapping bolts. However, since WW 2, military weapons were subject to a periodic tech inspection that included checking headspace, FP protrusion, etc. Parts would be replaced by the 3rd echelon ordnance teams as needed. Commonality of parts was greater than in the M-N.

__________________

What we have heah is.... failure to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 10:17 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chainfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,257
Liked 1081 Times on 699 Posts
Likes Given: 273

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c3shooter View Post
We attempted to avoid swapping bolts. However, since WW 2, military weapons were subject to a periodic tech inspection that included checking headspace, FP protrusion, etc. Parts would be replaced by the 3rd echelon ordnance teams as needed. Commonality of parts was greater than in the M-N.
Agreed about the American guns C3, but the Mosin must have the best interchangability over 70 years and many models of just about any gun. The numbered parts are fully interchangable; the bolt from my 1895 model M-1891 works perfectly in my 1955 T-53, or in a Finn M-1939, and the magazine floor plate and butt-plates are universal, and the bayonets nearly universal. There must be some other reason that it was so important to the Soviets.
__________________

"It is better to be too skeptical then too credulous"

Carl Sagan

Chainfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 04:02 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Trez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 3-P
Posts: 3,608
Liked 692 Times on 459 Posts
Likes Given: 702

Default

Still seems weird to me, about every military besides ours numbered parts....
Arisakas are numbered, Mausers, etc.... (Germans were crazy.. even the screws "match")

__________________
Quote:
...... I suffer from a very rare genetic defect that causes me to be sympathetic toward the International cause. There is no cure.
Trez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 05:36 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 53
Default

Might have to do with just how much confidence we have in interchangable parts. Hand fitting not required. Unlike the Germans and others that even numbered the screws.(Of course they tended to be a little anal in the first place...)

__________________
deadin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 06:22 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,093
Liked 5241 Times on 2733 Posts
Likes Given: 329

Default

Our firearms are almost totally plug and play. Even the 1911 you can with milspec guns strip the parts down to the smallest pin off 10 guns shake em in a bag and have 10 working 1911s.

Since 1900ish our manufacture processess have turned out consistant identical parts for just about everything. No need to number parts.

Foreign guns not so much. Some will swap well others wont.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 10:35 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,913
Liked 671 Times on 461 Posts
Likes Given: 674

Default

European rifles matched from day one. If you had an issue of a little gas hitting your brow and the rifle matches, time for a re-barrel. If it does not match, were the lugs out of spec? damaged from bolt thrust? Makes it much easier to figure out what was wrong. The German were very anal, past what was needed. European armorers also had an armorers bolt that was used to test arms that were in the feild to make sure all was correct. All those numbers told the story to an armorer. Was it original, was it repaired before?

__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 11:42 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
The German were very anal, past what was needed.
I'll say! If you ever get a chance to examine a German Commission Revolver from the 1870-80 period, they even numbered the charge holes in the cylinder from 1 to 6.

I wonder what the punishment was if you fired them out of order.....


__________________
deadin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Do Military Guns with Matching Numbers Really Match? Trez Curio & Relic Discussion 8 03-26-2012 10:22 PM
Good: "10 years later, opposition to concealed guns fades" 2manyhobbies Legal and Activism 5 08-02-2011 06:57 PM
"Sons of Guns" show on Discovery DrJason The Club House 9 01-03-2011 12:41 AM
Couple of vids....women with guns and "destruction" AcidFlashGordon The Club House 6 03-20-2010 08:07 PM
Florida lawmakers pass "take your guns to work" law sculker The Club House 2 04-10-2008 04:34 PM