Mystery Enfield?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Curio & Relic Discussion > Mystery Enfield?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2014, 10:01 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 110
Liked 26 Times on 22 Posts

Default Mystery Enfield?

Hi all:

So I finally took the plunge and bought my first Enfield, even though I only know the most basic points about them. I bought this gun from a fellow Calgunner who has shot it and it seems to be a nice rifle. To be clear, this rifle seems to me to possibly be a mix master, the wood looks as if it has been sanded and that's okay as I got a good deal and I want this mainly as a shooter more than a collector. That said, some of the parts look as if they could have been scrubbed, for some reason, most of the markings look soft and garbled, take a look, you'll see what I mean.

A few questions:

1. The receiver is stamped "England" and has a small crown proof mark so I know that this is not a Canadian, American or Australian. But the markings on the opposite side receiver band are a mish mosh, even the serial number looks funky. The date 1943 is pretty clear and several of the parts of stamped with an upper case B.

2. Is that seam along the bottom of the magazine normal?

3. The bolt is tight and smooth and the trigger feels very good for a military rifle. The bore looks to have lots of life left in it, it has some mirror shine to it, can't tell if the particulate in the bore is corrosion, carbon or just grease/cosmo residue? I will have to give this gun a good cleaning to get the whole story on the bore, but strong lands and grooves.

4. Crown and front sight look good.

5. Seller listed it as an Enfield #4 MKI, but in looking at the faint receiver markings, they look like No 4 MKII to me? How can one tell the difference between a No 4 MKI and MKII?

This is my first so are there any problem or trouble areas to look for? I will buy a few hundred rounds of Prvi to put through it and will then begin reloading with that brass.

Let me know what you think about this rifle and what your opinions are as to the possible origin of it. Also came with the pig sticker and cover, both of which are in great shape. Very happy I took the plunge, even though I have only shot one Enfield, I like them and will likely enjoy shooting with this one a lot.



__________________

Last edited by Capybara; 02-23-2014 at 02:30 PM.
Capybara is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-22-2014, 10:02 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 110
Liked 26 Times on 22 Posts

Default



__________________

Last edited by Capybara; 02-23-2014 at 02:31 PM.
Capybara is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2014, 11:34 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: tucson,arizona
Posts: 531
Liked 205 Times on 133 Posts
Likes Given: 66

Default

Of the couple No4s that I have, the seam on the magazine can be full length and very obvious or it can be welded over and ground kinda smooth (Savage). So, I would say yours is somewhere in the middle.

__________________
JWagner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 12:26 AM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,161
Liked 9509 Times on 4092 Posts
Likes Given: 1493

Default

Starting with the No. 4 mark 1, the numbers were all Arabic instead of Roman, So that would be a No. 4 Mark 2, not a Mark II. No. 4 MK 2 was adopted in 1949, 6 years after yours. The aluminum buttplate was WW 2- went back to brass in 49.

Biggest difference between mark 1 and mark 2- on the mark 1, trigger is attached to trigger guard. mark 2, attached it to receiver. MUCH better trigger.

Pretty rifle, BTW.

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 02:05 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 110
Liked 26 Times on 22 Posts

Default

Thanks for the input guys. I am hearing some interesting info from all of the boards I posted this to but as far as I can see, this thing is a mix master mutt, which is fine for the price I bought it for, it will be a nice looking shooter, not a rare collectible.

__________________
Capybara is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2014, 08:38 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
303tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,947
Liked 1337 Times on 908 Posts
Likes Given: 1429

Default

I would like to see a picture or two of the Wrist, then it would`nt be a mystery.................

__________________

When all else fails.

303tom is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
New Enfield ShagNasty1001 General Rifle Discussion 43 03-31-2013 04:26 PM
Enfield L85 synical AR-15 Discussion 3 01-13-2012 11:41 PM
enfield mk 4 dicky0331 DIY Projects 7 08-04-2010 09:51 PM
Enfield No4 MK I - Help TXnorton Curio & Relic Discussion 19 11-19-2009 12:32 AM
Enfield 2A mk3 elktracker General Rifle Discussion 2 07-05-2007 10:02 PM