 |
04-01-2012, 03:21 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
|
M44 history?
I've owned a Mosin Nagant for a few years now and I've tried to do some research on my rifle but there are so many models its hard to be sure if I even have a M44 or something else. Anyone know a little history to specific models? Most of the dates stamped on the gun are 1935 which I'm guessing is its manufacture date thanks for any info in advance.
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 03:31 AM
|
#2
|
|
Game on...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,695
Liked 698 Times on 403 Posts Likes Given: 375
|
Tracking the history of any specific Mosin is next to impossible. There just isn't any remaining documentation on the who, whats and wheres. All that remains are the permanent engravings in the rifles themselves and that's part of their mystiquee, every rifle has it's own unique history and personality. Here's a link with some general MN information and a good source to assist with identifying many of the marks, stamps, etc...
http://7.62x54r.net/
__________________
"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 04:02 AM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 909
Liked 180 Times on 111 Posts Likes Given: 263
|
If I'm not mistaken, the M44 was created as a tank rifle. Its just a cut down 91/30 made to fit in a tank. That's about all I know about them.
Hopefully C3 will chime in and back me up, or correct me. :/
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 04:15 AM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Prescott Valley,Arizona
Posts: 2,359
Liked 183 Times on 131 Posts Likes Given: 10
|
Looks like a 38 but I can't tell, does it have a bayonet, and can you post more pictures?
__________________
------------Space Not for Hire.-----------
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 05:14 AM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 13,296
Liked 3801 Times on 1853 Posts Likes Given: 547
|
The earliest carbine predates the tank. The 1907 Carbine was made 1907-1917, and was intended for artilleryman, signal corps, engineers, etc.
Your rifle if made in 1935 would not be an M38 (no bayonet) nor an M44 (folding bayonet). The M38 was made 1939-1943 at Izhevsk Arsenal, and in 1940 and 1944 at Tula. The M44 was put into production in late 1944.
Carbines were intended for second echelon troops. They are only about 8 inches shorter than the rifles, and would still be rather awkward in a tank (those were SMALL tanks) Tanker more likely to have a pistol and/or SMG.
Please post some better pics, and measure the overall length of your rifle. Odds are you have an 1891/59 carbine. These were made in Bulgaria in 1959 by cutting down 91/30 rifles.
__________________
What we have heah is.... failure to communicate.
Last edited by c3shooter; 04-01-2012 at 05:17 AM.
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 05:18 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
|
1891/59 is what's stamped on the barrel so if that's what it says its a Bulgarian rifle carbine? I will post more pictures soon. Thank you everyone for the info by The way...if my riffled is indeed a 1891/59 carbine then who were they given to for what type of mission?
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 05:26 PM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 13,296
Liked 3801 Times on 1853 Posts Likes Given: 547
|
As we said- carbines were issued to "second echelon" troops- folks that were doing something other than going out to shoot the enemy as a primary mission. Artillerymen manning cannon, truck drivers with supply trucks, engineers building a bridge, signalers laying field phone lines, mechanics repairing vehicles.
That, incodentally was the original intended use of the US M1 Carbine- but it would up being used by front line troops.
__________________
What we have heah is.... failure to communicate.
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 05:50 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
|
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 05:56 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thank you c3 I'm sorry if ask a lot of the same questions its all kindof confusing with how much goes into these rifles. You've been very helpful and I appreciate all the info. All this time I've been thinking its a m44 lol
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Firearms Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Souvenirs with a history
|
c3shooter |
The Club House |
25 |
05-29-2010 05:36 PM |
|
History on M-16
|
Dzscubie |
AR-15 Discussion |
5 |
02-08-2010 07:25 PM |
|
History
|
Kelly J |
Politics, Religion and Controversy |
1 |
11-08-2009 07:58 PM |
|
A little gun history
|
sculker |
The Club House |
1 |
03-19-2009 02:05 AM |
|
|
|