Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   Curio & Relic Discussion (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f37/)
-   -   I need some help with butt plate ID (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f37/i-need-some-help-butt-plate-id-50990/)

207driver 11-01-2011 04:12 PM

I need some help with butt plate ID M1903?
 
2 Attachment(s)
This looks to me to be a Springfield 1903 plate. However I am told it is not.

The possible discrepancies that I can see are; the size of the port pivot/spring attachment, and the spring screw protrusion through the back of the plate. But could those be a revision issue?

If anyone has any idea what this could be from besides an early Springfield, please let me know.

The only marking on it is an 'E' stamped on the back of the port cover. If more pics are needed just advise, I suppose I should have given some dimensions, and will do so if that would help ID this.

Thanks, Sled driver

TheOldMan 11-02-2011 02:27 PM

I believe it is indeed for a 1903 but an earlier version prior to the stamped checkered buttplates. 1903A1

207driver 11-02-2011 04:56 PM

I am also certain that it is for a 1903. I am not familiar with any of the guns of this era and so want some informed opinions. From what I can see of what is offered presently, it's a duck so to speak.

Obviously the "E" marking signifies something, can anyone tell me what that may be?

Trez 11-02-2011 05:45 PM

Looks just like the one on my 1933 made 1903...

The "E" I would guess is some sorta arsenal mark,.... I far as I know Eddiestone never made 1903's

Highpower 11-03-2011 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trez (Post 617767)
.... I far as I know Eddiestone never made 1903's

No, but they did make M1917's.... <hint> ;)

TheOldMan 11-03-2011 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Highpower (Post 618388)
No, but they did make M1917's.... <hint> ;)

I'll check mine and post what I see...

207driver 11-03-2011 05:56 PM

M1917?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Highpower (Post 618388)
No, but they did make M1917's.... <hint> ;)

Right, that appears to make the most sense. The Eddystone mark if indeed that is what it is, would make this an M1917 Enfield plate. Are they so close in measurements that one could fit the other? I have seen pictures that appear to match the profile of this plate on a 1903 stock.

I mic'd it and came up with this:

Tang length from inside=1.75"
Screw hole (Center) in tang from inside=0.75"
Lower plate screw hole (Center) from bottom of tang=3.525"
Overall length from bottom of tang=4.6"
Width=1.6"


Also the port opening top edge is 0.75" from the bottom of the tang, and measures 0.895 in diameter on my caliper

Highpower 11-03-2011 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 207driver (Post 618588)
I mic'd it and came up with this:

Tang length from inside=1.75"

Are you sure that's not closer to 1.15" ?

207driver 11-03-2011 09:03 PM

You are SO right! the tang is 1.15 inches long. Bad eyesight--low light level--operator error...I have no excuse.

TheOldMan 11-03-2011 09:10 PM

Just checked my Eddystone.... Identical to this one.. My vote is 1917 Eddystone buttplate :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.