Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   Gunsmithing Forum (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f33/)
-   -   Hammer "Stub" Too Small (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f33/hammer-stub-too-small-25286/)

chuck_in_texas 03-28-2010 05:24 PM

Hammer "Stub" Too Small
 
My Taurus 851 snub is a nice little carry piece. I bought it (over the Mod 85) because of the shrouded hammer.

However, the "stub" of the hammer that's supposed to permit SA cocking is really tiny. Touch of arthritis in my right hand, and to use it SA I have to reach over with my left thumb to cock it. Probably not the safest thing to do.

Tried a buddy's S&W with shrouded hammer, and it's not easy but easier than the Taurus.

Taurus CS says it's normal, and says I can send it in for a second opinion, but I'm not sure what that will do. I was thinking maybe of having a small spot weld or braze on top to give my thumb something to grip.

Anybody else encountered this - - - - - as has a fix.

BTW, the DA pull is fine, so I don't think the hammer is binding.

Glasshartt 03-28-2010 05:32 PM

Chuck, someone should be along shortly to give you some options. In the mean time, wuld you mind going over to the introductions thread and telling us a little about yourself?

Dzscubie 03-28-2010 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuck_in_texas (Post 259147)
My Taurus 851 snub is a nice little carry piece. I bought it (over the Mod 85) because of the shrouded hammer.

However, the "stub" of the hammer that's supposed to permit SA cocking is really tiny. Touch of arthritis in my right hand, and to use it SA I have to reach over with my left thumb to cock it. Probably not the safest thing to do.

Tried a buddy's S&W with shrouded hammer, and it's not easy but easier than the Taurus.

Taurus CS says it's normal, and says I can send it in for a second opinion, but I'm not sure what that will do. I was thinking maybe of having a small spot weld or braze on top to give my thumb something to grip.

Anybody else encountered this - - - - - as has a fix.

BTW, the DA pull is fine, so I don't think the hammer is binding.



Chuch,

As I see it the whole purpose of a shrouded hammer is to keep the hammer from being accidently being cocked back and placing the weapon in single action stage. I believe, not sure mind you, they were designed for concealed carry for police. If you want to cock your weapon and shoot single action why not just buy one with an exposed hammer? If you extend the hammer, and that's what I think you’re saying when you talk about putting “a small spot weld or braze on top” you are defeating the purpose of having a shrouded hammer. I would not do it myself.

superc 03-28-2010 06:20 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I would give strong thought to obtaining a second hammer, then having that hammer built up via Tig welding to a shape you are comfortable with.

Keep one hammer in original configuration just in case you someday want to go back to square one.

The bottom gun pictured (Charter Arms Undevcover .38) now has a serrated top hammer shape that might be more to your liking. The original hammer, which now sits in drawer somewhere, wasn't too far away in shape from the top pistols. I have seen similar hammer mods done to S&W K and N frames also.

stalkingbear 03-28-2010 06:47 PM

Buy a model 85 hammer and grind away the spur until you have just enough left to manually cock the revolver if you HAVE to shoot it single action. If it was ME I'd just practice double action only as that's the way the gun was designed to be fired anyway. The hammer was designed to not snag on clothing during the draw and any modifications to the hammer will affect that. I would recommend having a Wolff spring kit installed to safely, reliably reduce the trigger pull weight on DA.

chuck_in_texas 03-28-2010 09:54 PM

thanks to all for the quick answers! I mainly shoot the gun DA, and I bought the shrouded hammer since I pocket carry. (and pocket guns are DA, I know) the reason I had wanted the shrouded hammer, as opposed to a DA only (I also have a Ruger LCR that's DAO), was to have SA available as an option.

What's troubling me, I suppose, is that the effort to get it cocked in SA is way more than I think it should be (at least way more than my old bones can handle).

but it may be that all Taurus pieces with this config are like this.

I guess my next step is to take it to a good smith and see what he says about whether or no anything is impeding. I DO like the idea of getting a second hammer before I try this, in case I want to go back to the original. Or, in case it had to go back for factory service.

thanks again!!

stalkingbear 03-28-2010 10:31 PM

Another nice thing about the Wolff spring kits is they'll reduce cocking effort by 40%.

chuck_in_texas 03-29-2010 08:39 PM

stalkingbear:

with the wolff springs, have you ever encountered a FTF? I've heard about them but been reluctant to try.

I guess all I could do is to try a set and see if ignition is normal, eh?

DrumJunkie 03-29-2010 08:47 PM

I've heard of people having trouble with Wolff springs but I've used them for a few weapons and not had the issue come up. I sometimes wonder if the ones with problems have not been installed properly but I have not actually held the "problem weapon(s)" so I can't make that assumption.

stalkingbear 03-29-2010 09:21 PM

I've never experienced a failure to fire with the Wolff spring kits. I go with the middle weight mainspring when faced with a choice. If they weren't reliable I wouldn't recommend them.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.