Load Data Discrepancies?
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Ammunition & Reloading >

Load Data Discrepancies?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2012, 12:24 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TLuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: S.C.
Posts: 3,558
Liked 1973 Times on 1261 Posts
Likes Given: 4470

Default Load Data Discrepancies?

I知 looking at the load data for 175gr 308win and I知 seeing some pretty big discrepancies. The min. load from the powder manufacturer is almost the same as the max load from the bullet manufacturer. The two sets of data are for the same components including the same brand of bullet. I知 guessing the difference is the rifle used to develop the data? The bullet manufacturer used a 26 barrel with a 1:10 rate of twist, which isn稚 very representative of most .308痴. I do not know what was used by the powder manufacturer.

Is it common to see these kinds of discrepancies for load data?


TLuker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-26-2012, 12:45 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,661
Liked 1321 Times on 750 Posts
Likes Given: 636

Default

If you look in several different load manuals,you will see a wide range of differences in the same load data.

I will load up until I see high pressure signs,and then back it off some if that's where the best performance for a particular bullet is.
Most of my guns shoot better with middle of the load data range,but I have a few that like them pretty hot.


Txhillbilly is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 12:49 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,271
Liked 6823 Times on 3626 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

Yes its common. Thats why you need to consider the barrel length used. I use several load manuals and try to pick recipes with test data that closely match the barrel im using.

General rule is reduce charge weight from max by 10% and work up slowly.
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 04:51 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BlueTurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 1,030
Liked 45 Times on 31 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

I reference several reloading manuals and see a big difference between them for the same cartridges. I use a lot of Hornady bullets and have noticed that their load data is pretty conservative compared to the others. I follow their recommendations when using their bullets and have had good luck. I think it is really important to make note of the firearm and components used to do the testing and compile the load data. There are a lot of variables involved that can affect performance.

Last edited by BlueTurf; 02-26-2012 at 05:11 PM.
BlueTurf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 11:09 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TLuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: S.C.
Posts: 3,558
Liked 1973 Times on 1261 Posts
Likes Given: 4470

Default

Thanks

Just out of curiosity do any of you have a particular method for working your way up such as an extra % at a time or is it just something based on experience?
TLuker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 01:28 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BlueTurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 1,030
Liked 45 Times on 31 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLuker View Post
Thanks

Just out of curiosity do any of you have a particular method for working your way up such as an extra % at a time or is it just something based on experience?
Now I work my way up based on my experience. I have been reloading for about 30 years. I have tried to make note of what works and what does not. As a general rule I work my way up at half-grain increments for rifle cartridges and will even go to increments of one-tenth of a grain for handgun loads. This is a rather simple explanation, as the powder I am using will make a difference. I shoot the different loads from a rest and check how they group. I also check the velocity with my chronograph. I look for signs of excessive pressure, such as primer cratering and brass deformities. I know some loaders will keep going up and up but I stay within a specified range, usually the load data for the specific bullet I am using. I hope this helps. I can tell you that I have learned a lot about what not to do from loaders who were not very careful and made mistakes.
BlueTurf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 02:20 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 293
Liked 10 Times on 7 Posts

Default

"I’m guessing the difference is the rifle used to develop the data?"

Correct. It's much more than barrel length, which has no effect on max charges at all. YOUR rifle is still different so we're always told to 'satrat low and work up slowly....," etc.

Choose any method of charge increase you're comfortable with but few of us bother with percentages. I move up in .2 gr steps with small cases, .3 gr in medium and .5 gr with the really big boys simply because I've found that to be plenty small enough for safety and for finding a good load too.
1hole is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 04:07 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BlueTurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 1,030
Liked 45 Times on 31 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

Barrel length and its effect on velocity is discussed all the time. I was testing my .44 mag loads in my Super Blackhawk with a 7.5" barrel. I was using the Hornady 240-grain XTP with three different powders, H110, 296 and Lil' Gun. At the same time I was having a friend try the same loads in his Henry rifle with a 20" barrel. We were using a chronograph to measure the velocity. The velocity of the bullets coming out of the rifle were about 200 fps faster than my pistol. We got some very consistent velocity with both firearms with all three loads. The grouping was really good with both guns also. If it means anything the bullets coming out of my Super Blackhawk averaged in the 1350 fps range.


BlueTurf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
223 subsonic load data linuxuser3890 Ammunition & Reloading 21 09-07-2012 10:48 PM
.300 Savage Load Data divarty General Rifle Discussion 6 01-10-2012 07:10 PM
Need load data for 308 win ANAKINANAYA Ammunition & Reloading 4 05-22-2011 01:01 AM
load data laynejc Ammunition & Reloading 3 03-22-2010 08:23 PM
9mm HAP load data ah141nj Ammunition & Reloading 0 12-16-2008 01:50 AM



Newest Threads