Less than lethal ammo?
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Ammunition & Reloading >

Less than lethal ammo?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2012, 02:00 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
windsor3189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Columbus,OH
Posts: 17
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default Less than lethal ammo?

Has anyone had any experience with the "less than lethal" ammo? I just read a brief article on this site and was not aware of it for civilian CC. Usually I carry an XDm .40/3.8, sometimes a "Snubby". Opinions or thoughts anyone?



Less-Lethal-Rounds-101



windsor3189 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 12-15-2012, 02:40 PM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,931
Liked 3582 Times on 1838 Posts
Likes Given: 399

Default

First, it is NOT "less than lethal" it is "less lethal". It is still potentially lethal, just "less" likely to kill or cause serious bodily injury. Less than lethal is a term used to describe things like TASERs and Pepper spray


__________________
In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball
robocop10mm is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 04:30 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,719
Liked 8193 Times on 4478 Posts
Likes Given: 7976

Default

Since you really should use your weapon ONLY to stop real and immediate threats on your life or the life of another innocent, I would think you would want the most lethal round made. Just MHO!
__________________
I didn't fight to defend your freedom so you could vote to take away mine.
locutus is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 04:47 PM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,268
Liked 6820 Times on 3623 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

my thinking on this topic of less than lethal bs is it is bs. if you have someone coming after you and you choose to use potentially lethal force (mace pepper spray stun gun rubber bullets) you obviously werent in danger enough to use a weapon in the first place. any weapon should, in my estimation, only be used when there is threat of imminent serious bodily harm or death.

police have a need for less lethal options, civilians should only be using weapons as a last resort. police have a long list of levels of force to use in a given situation from simply detaining a person by verbal request which is force to using machine guns and everything in between.

civilians only have two states. am i in danger and can escape safely?? or do i need to shoot this guy to be safe. we arent stopping drunks or seperating bickering couples or telling people to stop the loud music its not our job. we have no need for less lethal weapons that are still lethal.

for civilians raising a fist against another person is often considered use of deadly force. i just think that if you arm yourself with something other than real guns and real bullets you open yourself to lawsuits after the fact. why didnt you use the rubber bullet on mustapha?? he was just turning his life around
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 06:57 PM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,931
Liked 3582 Times on 1838 Posts
Likes Given: 399

Default

Exactly Jon. I have a baton, a TASER, pepper spray, some grappling skills and several firearms available to me at all times. I have used all EXCEPT the firearm to end a situation. I do not have the option of just walking away from a fight. I run INTO the fight.
__________________
In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball
robocop10mm is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 07:07 PM   #6
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22314 Times on 12477 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

for SD or even HD uses, less lethal ammo is the wrong choice. civilians are not usually placing themselves in harms way like LEO's are doing everytime they go to work. a civilian using a firearm would be a last resort or emercency situation and not an everyday occurence. a civilian in the unlikely chance of having to use a firearm in defence of themselves or loved ones, needs to end that threat as quickly as possible. a LEO has much more training in the use of less than lethal items and less lethal ammo and knows when they need to use either.
Axxe55 is offline  
wizard63 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 08:51 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tri70's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Siloam Springs,Arkansas
Posts: 1,324
Liked 541 Times on 324 Posts
Likes Given: 2178

Default

Less than lethal would be shooting air soft or paintball guns.
__________________
Remember the battle of Athens, TN!

"Work as if you were to live 100 Years, Pray as if you were to die To-morrow." --Benjamin Franklin
tri70 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 04:29 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
GaMatt72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 456
Liked 22 Times on 21 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

If I am wanting to stop a threat why would I take a chance on him/her being able to still advance? I want the to be stopped as in cold!!!
GaMatt72 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 01:40 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
windsor3189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Columbus,OH
Posts: 17
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Thanks for the responses. I could not agree more with you all that the "less lethal" just seems wrong headed when faced with a lethal threat. I just find it interesting that there is such a product when most ammo questions seem to focus on 'stopping power", neutralising the threat and the industry puts out something that could give a false sense of security.

I'll stick with the real thing for SD/HD.


windsor3189 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
snap cap to less lethal round? mountainman13 DIY Projects 11 06-06-2012 04:49 AM
Less Lethal, but still with a serious punch?? Dillinger Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 42 12-08-2011 04:09 PM
Non-Lethal Weapon lucky#number Survival & Sustenance Living Forum 27 06-03-2009 08:16 PM
Less Than Lethal? weaponsetc. Survival & Sustenance Living Forum 10 02-07-2009 12:33 PM



Newest Threads