Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Ammunition & Reloading > I see why 357 sig cost more than 40

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2013, 05:15 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 24
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default I see why 357 sig cost more than 40

I used my conversion barrel for the first time and now I realize why 357 sig cost more than forty. It is much more accurate, the follow-up shots are faster, and the bullets feed easier into the chamber. I don't know if I even want to shoot 40 anymore but I probably will because it's cheaper. With 357 sig you can see true precision. The target at 25 yards seemed closer after the conversion. The recoil seemed much more manageable. I think I'll try my underwood 40 ammo and compare them next time.



__________________

Last edited by versatile; 05-05-2013 at 06:53 PM.
versatile is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 05-05-2013, 05:55 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CHLChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,523
Liked 190 Times on 129 Posts
Likes Given: 89

Default

Are you using a Glock 22/23 with a 357Sig barrel? Do you use the same magazines?

What's your setup?



__________________
.45acp, .40 S&W, 9mm, .38 Spl, .380 acp, 22lr
12 gauge, .223/5.56x45mm, 30-30 Winchester


2 Chron. 7:14 Christians must seek His face
CHLChris is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 06:48 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 24
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHLChris View Post
Are you using a Glock 22/23 with a 357Sig barrel? Do you use the same magazines?

What's your setup?
p226 40/357 frame. same 15 round mec-gar magazines.
__________________

Last edited by versatile; 05-05-2013 at 06:51 PM.
versatile is offline  
Jagermeister Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 08:41 PM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 9,944
Liked 2607 Times on 1371 Posts
Likes Given: 202

Default

It is more expensive partially because there is not as much demand. Also, it is more difficult to load.

It does feed much more easily as you are stuffing a 9mm bullet into a .40 caliber chamber.

Conversions are pretty fool proof. Because the Sig round is essentially a necked down .40, the same magazines are used. You can even get conversion barrels for 10mm pistols

__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 09:30 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 24
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

i think it's easier to put 357 sig in the magazine. the blunt, blocky tips of the 40 s&w make it easy for bullets to slip on one another. the 357 sig is even easier to drop in the chamber.

__________________

Last edited by versatile; 05-05-2013 at 09:32 PM.
versatile is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 09:36 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 493
Liked 54 Times on 43 Posts

Default

Reloading the .357 sig is a breeze. The components, minus the brass, is all the same as 9mm. I used a lot of converted 40 brass.
Accuracy is good, feeding is reliable and it is just as compact as any .40.
I used to own several guns in this caliber.

__________________
msup752 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 09:40 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 9,944
Liked 2607 Times on 1371 Posts
Likes Given: 202

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by msup752 View Post
Reloading the .357 sig is a breeze. The components, minus the brass, is all the same as 9mm. I used a lot of converted 40 brass.
Accuracy is good, feeding is reliable and it is just as compact as any .40.
I used to own several guns in this caliber.
It does not cause much of an obstacle to loading for us "small" volume loaders. Run it through a high speed machine and you will see the difficulty. Rifle loaders are slower than pistol loaders (commercial). The .357 Sig is similar to loading rifle ammo.
__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 09:51 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DrumJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Here in the holler....
Posts: 4,823
Liked 1616 Times on 944 Posts
Likes Given: 1894

Default

The 357 Sig round is pretty good. I had a 229 that I had another bbl for. The cost, availability and the fact they where harder to reload was my only reason for not using it more. Being most of my pistol ammo I reload made it just not cost effective.



__________________

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

DrumJunkie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
That dog may cost you $100,000 a day Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 11-14-2012 04:37 PM
9mm vs .45 acp cost SmokyMtnHiker Ammunition & Reloading 12 02-19-2012 04:36 PM
Why does a 357 or 44 Mag cost more then a 30-30?? spittinfire The Club House 16 01-20-2010 11:48 AM
Cost of SKS Starduck AK & SKS Discussion 5 05-07-2008 10:55 PM