"blowback"? - Page 3
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Ammunition & Reloading > "blowback"?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2010, 11:16 AM   #21
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,996
Liked 710 Times on 488 Posts
Likes Given: 730

Default

Why don't you save your berdan brass and sell it ti the scrap man. That is how I pay for odd brass I use. Brass is selling for $1.00 a pound right now. I admit, not being able to use the Swiss brass is a crime.

__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 12:40 PM   #22
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,081
Liked 2743 Times on 1437 Posts
Likes Given: 231

Default

I get $1.18/lb for scrap brass. I just save it up in a 5 gallon bucket. When I have 2 buckets full, I make a run to the scrap yard. That usually takes about 3 months...Yeah, I go through a lot of brass.

__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 05:46 PM   #23
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 474
Liked 41 Times on 25 Posts
Likes Given: 230

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
H-110 is a very good choice for Magnum revolver rounds. I use a similar powder (W-296) for my hot loads in .357, .41 and .44 mag. Gray residue is well burnt powder. In the cast bullet loads, are you using H-110?

I would be a bit concerned of an overcharge. My experience with .41 mag tells me it is an efficient cartridge capable of exceeding .44 mag ballistics. The guns are marginally stronger than comparable .44's because of the smaller holes bored into the same size cylinder/barrel giving more steel to protect you.

I would pull a few of the bullets and weigh the charge. Triple check the charge weight against your loading data and the Hodgdon web site to make sure you have not goofed.

According to the Hodgdon web site the max load for a 210 gr JHP is 22 grains for 1631 fps (that is FAST!) and 26.5 gr for a 170 gr JHC yielding 1887 fps (that is REALLY fast!!!). I use 22 gr of W-296 with the 170 gr in all three of my .41 Mags.
It's possible that the "blowback" is unburned powder, I would be real concerned with overcharges of H-110 and probably 296 as well considering they are very much alike. Many years ago I knew a guy that thought it was cool to hot load .357 mags for his Colt Trooper with H-110, I looked at the top strap just above the barrel gap and the hot loads had gas cut quite deeply into the metal of the backstrap and had also eroded some of the barrel and cylinder faces. Basically the Trooper was becoming a piece of junk. I have used H-110 long ago, it's good powder but I like 296 as it seems to burn a bit cleaner in my 44 Redhawk, the shells have a light gray inside just like the inside of an exhaust pipe of a very good running car. When I loaded H-110 for my .357 Security Six that had a 6" barrel it would produce a ball of bright fire the size of a basketball at the muzzle.
__________________
Viking is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
"Keep" , "Bear" , "Infringed" Shallnotbeinfringed Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 38 03-21-2013 06:04 AM
"Do "Gun-Free" Zones Encourage School Shootings?" cnorman18 The Club House 26 04-17-2012 09:57 PM
No to HR 1022, "Assault Weapons Ban"" right winger Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 10-27-2008 01:54 AM
Witloe Remington 1858 New Model Army "Lee" & "Grant" bprevolver Blackpowder & Musket 0 09-25-2008 11:11 PM



Newest Threads