Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Ammunition & Reloading > 6.5 Grendel Trajectory Reality Check

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2010, 12:10 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default 6.5 Grendel Trajectory Reality Check

I have been interested in finding an upper for my M-4 lookalike in a caliber with more punch at 300 yards than 5.56 provides. The 6.5 Grendel data I have found has been zeroed for 600 yards as the table presumed the shooter is into 600-1,000 shooting. At least that's my guess. Those tables show a mid-trajectory altitude of 45-55 inches, which strikes me as odd for a round touted to be "flat shooting."

All of the other calibers' ballistics data I have found is based on a zero of 200 yards (except for 7.62x39 at 100 yds). Can anyone provide a pointer to data that would impress me a bit more?



__________________
NavArch is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 03-22-2010, 12:14 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3478 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

Well, I can't directly point you to what you are looking for, but I can tell you that the best ballistics data you can find is from a guy named Art Pejsa.

He broke the mathematical code on ballistics and his software is very well respected.

If someone is going to have the answer that doesn't shoot this round regularly, Art Pejsa would be my first source.

Good luck.

JD



__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 12:58 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,957
Liked 694 Times on 475 Posts
Likes Given: 714

Default

What would you consider "flat" at 600 yards? a 6.5x39 is a short cartridge. You hear that it has the characteristics of the 6.5x55, but really comes no where close. 400 yards it is a vg cartridge. 300 it is excellent. http://www.65grendel.com/faq.htm

__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 10:15 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpattersonnh View Post
What would you consider "flat" at 600 yards? a 6.5x39 is a short cartridge. You hear that it has the characteristics of the 6.5x55, but really comes no where close. 400 yards it is a vg cartridge. 300 it is excellent. http://www.65grendel.com/faq.htm
Perhaps I didn't ask the question clearly. What I was trying to say was that the ballistics data I have found for 6.5 Grendel has been based on a 600 yd zero, which comes from its intended use in long range target shooting. For my purposes (300 yd), I am looking for ballistics data based on a 200 or 300 yard zero. By zeroing the 6.5G at 600, it ends up with a rather large mid-range vertical divergence from LOS.

I was not comparing the 6.5G to the 7.62x39, which has a very loopy trajectory and loses considerable KE after 300 yds. The two start out with approximately the same KE, but the 7.62x39 energy at 300 yds is on par with the 6.5G at 500 yds.
__________________
NavArch is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 02:54 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 33 Times on 28 Posts

Default

This is using a 100gr Nosler BT at 2630fps MV.

With a 100 yard zero your looking at 16.8" of drop out to 300 yards. The 6.5x55mm has 15.4" drom from 100 to 300 yards.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 07:29 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default Thanks

Thanks for the 100 yd zero values. It looks like a 200 yd zero would give a bullet path that passed thru -1.6 at the muzzle, to +2.2 at 100 yd, to 0 at 200 yd. Does that match numbers you've seen?

__________________
NavArch is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 12:36 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default

http://www.alexanderarms.com/grendel_ballistics.pdf
__________________
Mutabam is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 10:40 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutabam View Post
That's where I went originally, but the 600 yd zero isn't what I'm looking for. If you go back to the first statement in my original post, my goal is not necessarily to make the 6.5 Grendel work for me, but rather to find the right horse to ride (so to speak).

Still looking, I guess.
__________________
NavArch is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 06:57 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Auburn,Ky,ky.
Posts: 9
Default

I know this post is a bit older but this may be of help...if I understand what it is you are asking for. Based on a 20" barrel with 129 Hornady SST(b.c.=
.485), and a scope height of 3.0" and muzzle vel. of 2400fps
100 yds=2.00" high
200 yds=0.00
300 yds=9.89" low
These are obviously numbers based on AR15 data. You can do much better in a bolt gun with longer barrels and the ability of the gun to stand much higher pressures than the AR can.
I love the Grendel case and think it's best served with lighter bullets and kept and ranges of 500yds and under. The problem then becomes quality lighter weight match grade bullets in 6.5 caliber I shoot a 30 cal version that I call a 30 Major in BR. I shoot 118gr bullets at 3000fps and can go faster but brass life begins to suffer at much more than that and my BR loads are WAY beyond what an AR can stand.--Mike Ezell



__________________

Last edited by MikeEzell; 08-31-2010 at 07:13 PM.
MikeEzell is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Thinking about getting a Grendel Upper. JWIII AR-15 Discussion 19 08-27-2010 10:55 PM
Voice of reality at Copenhagen maybe? AcidFlashGordon The Club House 2 11-29-2009 11:22 PM
Trajectory question oldredneck General Handgun Discussion 2 12-09-2007 07:40 PM
6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel magazines? alwaysastrategy General Rifle Discussion 0 05-22-2007 03:37 PM



Newest Threads