Originally Posted by 97cobra
They are right about the d.a but as far as the jury that wouldn't make sense. How could me having an "assault shotgun" make any difference as far as who is right ad who is wrong? It wouldn't. If someone breaks into my house and means me harm it wouldn't matter what I used.
That's why we have the castle doctrine. Doesn't matter what weapon is used if its in your own home.
And like others have said, makes for a good zombie gun.
I wouldn't plan on using a full 20 rounds on someone and realistically probably wouldn't use a drum at all because of the weight.
They just tend to freak out when we have more advanced weapons than the LEO's. Self defiance is self defiance and it dose not matter if you shoot them in the head or the foot. It is still considered use of deadly force. But when you
Start using guns more advanced than a flint lock. They won't to know why you have it and what the intended reason for owning a "deadly gun loaded with deadly ammo" was for.
Instead of asking questions like what was the reason for shooting?
Was you or your family in danger?
Did you feels our life was in danger?
Like they should
They are going to ask why do you have such a big gun?
Why do you need something like this?
And if it was me on the stand I would most likely say something to git me thrown in the big house. Like why the f*** dose it matter why I have it. Bc its 2012 and we don't use muskets and pitch forks. It's not my fault y'all are to damn cheep to by the Leo some good hardware.
I would also point out that the Leo was admiring the gun and stating they wish they had one. Like they would be doing.
I personally know Leo's in mobile that keep there personal ar's and other weapons in there patrol car. If you ask them why they take it. They will probably something like its better then the crap
they give us. But nobody will question them if they use theres.