An interesting little tidbit of info


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Shotgun Discussion > An interesting little tidbit of info

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2013, 12:57 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,036
Liked 100 Times on 83 Posts
Likes Given: 42

Default An interesting little tidbit of info

Now I don't usually believe everything I read on Wikipedia given any moron can edit it, but when I read this I found it to be at a minimum strange, but downright amusing either way. The following exert is copied and pasted directly from the Wikipedia page on the Winchester 1897 12 gauge shotgun;

Quote:
Although the Model 1897 was popular with American troops in World War I, the Germans soon began to protest its use in combat. "On 19 September 1918, the German government issued a diplomatic protest against the American use of shotguns, alleging that the shotgun was prohibited by the law of war." A part of the German protest read; "It is especially forbidden to employ arms, projections, or materials calculated to cause unnecessary suffering". "This is the only known occasion in which the legality of actual combat use of the shotgun has been raised." However, the United States interpreted their use of the shotgun differently than Germany. The Judge Advocate General of the Army, Secretary of State Robert Lansing carefully considered and reviewed the applicable law and promptly rejected the German protest. France and Britain considered using shotguns as trench warfare weapons during World War I. The shotgun in question was a double-barreled shotgun, which was not used because they were unable to obtain high powered ammunition and that type of gun is slow to reload in close combat.

German Response

The rejection of their protest greatly upset the German forces, because they believed they were treated unjustly in the war. Shortly after the protest was rejected, Germany issued threats that they would punish all captured American soldiers that were found to be armed with a shotgun. This led to the United States issuing a retaliation threat, stating that any measures unjustly taken against captured American soldiers would lead to an equal act by the United States on captured German soldiers.
I don't think I'll ever understand why anyone would think that anyone else wouldn't use the most devastating weapons available in a war.

As a matter of a fact, good ole General Patton himself said, and I quote;

"To use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time."

It's war, not a friendly game of chess


__________________

A good plan executed today is better than a perfect plan executed at some indefinite point in the future.
- General George Patton Jr

GeneralPatton is offline  
towboater Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 03-01-2013, 02:00 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Blueguns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 2,000 miles Northwest of Bill's Laundromat, Bar & Grill, CA
Posts: 2,001
Liked 538 Times on 379 Posts
Likes Given: 273

Default

I remember hearing that we were accused of war crimes from use of the Ithaca M37 in WWII. The troops were instructed to jump out of the trench, and slam fire the entire magazine into whoever was attacking. I'm gonna see if I can dig up the article, or a video link.



__________________

-Matt

Blueguns is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 10:41 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Virginian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Evangeline,Louisiana
Posts: 820
Liked 131 Times on 101 Posts

Default

Read the Geneva Convention's rules for warfare. Really absurd if you think about it. That is why rifle ammunition is fully metal jacketed instead of hollow point. But, it didn't address gas, so the Germans had no qualms about mustard gas. And it didn't address firebombing, and it didn't address nuclear weapons either, so the US was in the clear too. It did have some good language on treatment of POWs, but of course Japan was not a signatory.

__________________

What could have happened... did.

Virginian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 01:50 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ss33204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 86
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts

Default

Didn't the nazi ss use flamethrowers? Wouldn't that be a little worse than a shotgun?

__________________
ss33204 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 02:28 PM   #5
JTJ
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 6,056
Liked 1963 Times on 1062 Posts
Likes Given: 586

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss33204 View Post
Didn't the nazi ss use flamethrowers? Wouldn't that be a little worse than a shotgun?
We used flame throwers quite effectively.
__________________

Patron Member NRA
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of feces by the clean end."

JTJ is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 10:03 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,036
Liked 100 Times on 83 Posts
Likes Given: 42

Default

Quite frankly if I'm the foot soldier, I don't give a dam what any document says. The other side is shooting at me, and I'm shooting at them. I don't really give a **** what I'm shooting, from a slingshot to a howitzer.

__________________

A good plan executed today is better than a perfect plan executed at some indefinite point in the future.
- General George Patton Jr

GeneralPatton is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:59 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,058
Liked 2730 Times on 1429 Posts
Likes Given: 230

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss33204 View Post
Didn't the nazi ss use flamethrowers? Wouldn't that be a little worse than a shotgun?
Wrong war. The Waffen SS was WWII.
__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 12:19 AM   #8
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 16,670
Liked 8832 Times on 3824 Posts
Likes Given: 1366

Default

Just to split a couple of hairs- There are SEVERAL "Geneva Conventions". And Geneva Accords. And the Hague Convention, They regulated different things, and were amended as times changed.

They are a lawyers nightmare. Really.

And some of them were NOT ratified by the US, Some were AFFIRMED with reservations. "We won't unless they do, in which case we will."

Chem and bio? Yeah, we signed it. in 1977.

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 07:43 AM   #9
No Longer a NY Resident.
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kfox75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Erie County PA,
Posts: 2,516
Liked 1576 Times on 963 Posts
Likes Given: 8106

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralPatton View Post
Quite frankly if I'm the foot soldier, I don't give a dam what any document says. The other side is shooting at me, and I'm shooting at them. I don't really give a **** what I'm shooting, from a slingshot to a howitzer.
Yep. Pretty much sums it up as far as my feelings on it. If the other guy doesn't want to play by the rules, why should I? I don't give a rat's azz what I am carrying, I will use whatever means are at my disposal to return fire. If the other guy wants to b!tch about it, Ill offer him a nice cup of get over it.


__________________

Is it better to do the right thing for the wrong reason, or to do the wrong thing for the right reason? If you do the wrong thing for the right reason, is it still the wrong thing?

Si vis pacem para bellum.

To those who wish to take away our Second Amendment rights. What will you do when we, all 100,000,000 of us, stand as one, and say no?

kfox75 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Some interesting info danf_fl Firearms in the Media 11 11-30-2012 12:54 AM
Interesting info on my Weatherby fireguy General Shotgun Discussion 7 07-01-2012 12:52 AM
Interesting mrm14 The Club House 3 08-18-2011 10:46 PM
RRA Interesting Info JonM AR-15 Discussion 18 08-02-2011 02:34 PM
This was Interesting Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 3 05-24-2008 08:46 PM