Why American need to own assault weapons
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > Why American need to own assault weapons

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2013, 03:37 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Battle Creek,Mi
Posts: 207
Liked 45 Times on 27 Posts
Likes Given: 106

Default Why American need to own assault weapons

First off let me say I am personally offended by the us of the term "assault weapon" as it implies anyone that owns one of these miss classified guns will go forth and assault someone.

So I demand the they discontinue of the use of that terminology. Call it what it is, a semi automatic riffle that looks like a military firearm!

Now for the video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Fiu8jp4MC9A#!

__________________
2manyhobbies is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 01-11-2013, 02:35 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bear304inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,027
Liked 57 Times on 51 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I concur but good luck getting the lame stream media to follow along. Their verbage is not accidental, but well orchestrated and intentionally misleading to sway the majority of sheeple who wouldn't know independent thinking if it shot them in the @$$. Kinda like that saying if you call a kid retarded all his life, he will grow up thinking he IS retarded..
Well the mass populace is the exact opposite,, they are retarded being told have sensitive and savvy they are.


Lemmings.

__________________
Bear304inc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 02:57 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 6,001
Liked 4791 Times on 2317 Posts
Likes Given: 1482

Default

...and why do we need 30 round mags?

...because an Infantry Platoon consists of (4) 9 man squads!

Tack

__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 03:55 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bear304inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,027
Liked 57 Times on 51 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tackleberry1
...and why do we need 30 round mags?

...because an Infantry Platoon consists of (4) 9 man squads!

Tack
Wouldn't we need 36 round mags? :}
__________________
Bear304inc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 04:07 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Ruger22lr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 452
Liked 87 Times on 65 Posts
Likes Given: 69

Default

pah 36? Why not 40 rounds?

__________________
Ruger22lr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 04:22 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bear304inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,027
Liked 57 Times on 51 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruger22lr
pah 36? Why not 40 rounds?
Now we're talking,, just skip the mags, let's go belt fed.
__________________
Bear304inc is offline  
tshoot91 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 08:03 AM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
armsmaster270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 753
Liked 141 Times on 91 Posts
Likes Given: 156

Default

If you have the right firearm you can wait till they are lined up in a row & get a 2 or 3 in a row shot.

__________________
https://sites.google.com/a/armsmaster.net/www/
http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff207/armsmaster270/

http://militarysignatures.com/signat...ember14888.png
Retired LE, M.P., Sr. M.P. Investigator, armorer, F.B.I. Trained Rangemaster/Firearms Instructor , Presently Forensic Document Examiner for D.H.S.
armsmaster270 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 09:08 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 6,001
Liked 4791 Times on 2317 Posts
Likes Given: 1482

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear304inc View Post
Wouldn't we need 36 round mags? :}
Nope...you dump 20 as they advance...you'd need to shoot 10 more in the back as they fled in order to run dry.

Any adversaries aggression is directly tied to his feeling about his mission. Having served Infantry myself, I can tell you the notion of getting killed to force a policy that violates 2A would not be a popular one with the troops.

Tack
__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 04:00 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
scottybaccus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hutto,Tejas
Posts: 114
Liked 8 Times on 5 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

Careful guys. You are starting to make jokes about shooting at other Americans.

We are entitled to high capacity magazines because any limitations result in us being outgunned by adversaries in the role of self defense already affirmed under the 2nd Ammendment by the Supreme Court, AND it would have us outgunned by any other enemies, foreign or domestic. Whether cartels, street thugs or misguided police and soldiers executing illegal orders under bad legislation, we should not be impaired in our ability to defend our own lives.
The best real world example of this is seen in videos of the L.A. riots where store owners stood on their rooftops defending their stores against the mobs. Enough said. limitations on capacity = infringement!

__________________
scottybaccus is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 04:58 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
KY1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 105
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottybaccus View Post
Careful guys. You are starting to make jokes about shooting at other Americans.

We are entitled to high capacity magazines because any limitations result in us being outgunned by adversaries in the role of self defense already affirmed under the 2nd Ammendment by the Supreme Court, AND it would have us outgunned by any other enemies, foreign or domestic. Whether cartels, street thugs or misguided police and soldiers executing illegal orders under bad legislation, we should not be impaired in our ability to defend our own lives.
The best real world example of this is seen in videos of the L.A. riots where store owners stood on their rooftops defending their stores against the mobs. Enough said. limitations on capacity = infringement!
Really the joking about it makes us all appear in the image the media wants to portray... Gun Nuts. You make a great point, thank you! As ludicrous as it all is, we have to maintain our sense
__________________
KY1911 is offline  
scottybaccus Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Assault weapons ban xSTRIKERx Legal and Activism 262 01-14-2013 10:20 AM
calling them assault weapons paintsplat Politics, Religion and Controversy 5 01-02-2013 04:17 PM
Assault weapons ban Zodiac131911 Legal and Activism 28 07-28-2012 09:36 PM
No Assault Weapons Ban anytime soon. Last Crow Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 10-18-2009 06:24 PM
Reactivation of the '95 Assault Weapons Ban dglockster Legal and Activism 12 02-02-2008 07:45 PM