[locutus]

Originally Posted by M1Anut

Nice rifle, but I've owned both, there's no comparison. That's my opinion, but if a fal floats your boat, that's great! I lean towards accuracy more than just putting rounds down range. Fal's are a great battle rifle, but the M1A is that and so much more.

I'v e owned a NM M1a. I've never owned a FAL, but I've handled and fired a dozen of them or more.

I would agree that a match grade M1A is a better target rifle. But a battle rifle??? not so much!

[M1Anut]

Originally Posted by locutus

I'v e owned a NM M1a. I've never owned a FAL, but I've handled and fired a dozen of them or more.

I would agree that a match grade M1A is a better target rifle. But a battle rifle??? not so much!

Lol, ok! It's all in what you like, that's why we all have opinions!

[ahole]

As mutch as every one is going back and forth about the FAL and M1A and as mutch as I am a FAL lover. We still need to pay our respects to the Hk g3 and ptr91.

[locutus]

Originally Posted by M1Anut

Lol, ok! It's all in what you like, that's why we all have opinions!

Yep. I actually like the old Galil even better.

Too bad even Bill Gates can't afford to buy one anymore.