 |
10-10-2010, 07:50 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 905
Liked 88 Times on 57 Posts Likes Given: 134
|
m-14 barrel length?
Ok so I realy want to get a m14 leaning towards one of the springfield models but a question on the barrel length. If I go with the shorter barrel like the socom how much differnce in accuracy will I see compared to a standard barrel?
__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
--George Washington
|
|
|
10-10-2010, 08:24 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,039
Liked 100 Times on 74 Posts Likes Given: 9
|
The only thing I can see with going to a shorter barrel is loss of MV over the standard lenght barrel. I think longer range accuracy might suffer a bit. It all depends on your intended use of this rifle. I have mine with standard lenght barrel and original walnut stock. What they called the "Loaded" version. For what it is, it has done quite well at longer ranges. I'm just not quite sure how the shorter "SOCOM" model they make as of the last few years would perform at the 500 to 600 yard line compaired to the longer standard lenght barreled versions of M1A's. I believe it would be less percise at these distances.
For myself I don't particulary like the Socom versions of the M-14/M1A''s. They just dont look what a battle rifle should look like and for the one I had the oppertunity to shoot a couple of years ago, it just felt too much different, actually akward for me, than my standard length walnut stock M1A.
Hopefully M14'S Rock will chime in soon and shed some more light on this.
|
|
|
10-10-2010, 08:31 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,514
Liked 17 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 16
|
What is your ultimate intended purpose for the rifle? The Socom is plenty accurate, but if you plan on shooting matches you will need a full length. A great compromise is the Bush length that you get with the Squad Scout.
What distance are you planning to shoot at? More than 500?
__________________
NRA-Life
CRPA-Life
SAF-Life
PEIAPOI
"Obama has ordered the launching of more Tomahawk cruise missiles than All the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined."
|
|
|
10-10-2010, 08:35 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,514
Liked 17 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 16
|
Looks like great minds...
But I love the Socom for an all around rifle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm14
The only thing I can see with going to a shorter barrel is loss of MV over the standard lenght barrel. I think longer range accuracy might suffer a bit. It all depends on your intended use of this rifle. I have mine with standard lenght barrel and original walnut stock. What they called the "Loaded" version. For what it is, it has done quite well at longer ranges. I'm just not quite sure how the shorter "SOCOM" model they make as of the last few years would perform at the 500 to 600 yard line compaired to the longer standard lenght barreled versions of M1A's. I believe it would be less percise at these distances.
For myself I don't particulary like the Socom versions of the M-14/M1A''s. They just dont look what a battle rifle should look like and for the one I had the oppertunity to shoot a couple of years ago, it just felt too much different, actually akward for me, than my standard length walnut stock M1A.
Hopefully M14'S Rock will chime in soon and shed some more light on this.
|
__________________
NRA-Life
CRPA-Life
SAF-Life
PEIAPOI
"Obama has ordered the launching of more Tomahawk cruise missiles than All the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined."
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 01:19 AM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 905
Liked 88 Times on 57 Posts Likes Given: 134
|
Thanks guys for the input, I would only be wanting to shoot a distance no more than 500 yards, so I it would be safe to say that a SOCOM version would be adaqute?
__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
--George Washington
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 01:29 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,514
Liked 17 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 16
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colmustard
Thanks guys for the input, I would only be wanting to shoot a distance no more than 500 yards, so I it would be safe to say that a SOCOM version would be adaqute?
|
Socom will do fine to 500. They are easy to handle, and great if used in vehicles.
Not a match grade rifle, but for a general purpose/SHTF rifle it is hard to beat.
Just remember to only use CMI mags. Best deal is from 44Mag.com.
__________________
NRA-Life
CRPA-Life
SAF-Life
PEIAPOI
"Obama has ordered the launching of more Tomahawk cruise missiles than All the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined."
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 06:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 905
Liked 88 Times on 57 Posts Likes Given: 134
|
Thanks for the advice m14srock. Hopefully someday I will have both versions, but right now I can only choose one and thats a ways off lol, one other question though, are any of the operating parts inside the rifle differnt from each other since one is shorter i.e. will they both accept the same parts like op rod and such? thanks again
__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
--George Washington
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 09:54 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
|
The only problem a Socom has in shooting long range is the sights.The rear aperture is .125,and the front sight is a glow-in-the-dark wide sight.Neither are made for precision long shots,but for quick sight acquisition at relatively short range.I love my Socom as a general use rifle,but for 500 yards,I'd take the Scout.
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 03:16 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,514
Liked 17 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 16
|
Parts interchangeability is no problem. The shorter bbl requires a larger gas port, but the oprod is the same.
And Wayne is correct about the sights, but there are standard and NM sights avail that work on the Soc.
Mine was fine on steel plates at 500-600, though, with the factory XS Sights it came with, as well as the Aimpoint.
__________________
NRA-Life
CRPA-Life
SAF-Life
PEIAPOI
"Obama has ordered the launching of more Tomahawk cruise missiles than All the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined."
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 05:40 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 905
Liked 88 Times on 57 Posts Likes Given: 134
|
ok thanks alot you all
__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
--George Washington
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|