Ar hunting ? - Page 8
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion >

Ar hunting ?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2014, 05:19 PM   #71
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dwmiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Madisen, In
Posts: 1,428
Liked 642 Times on 463 Posts
Likes Given: 962

Default

My 6.8 is a purpose built hunter. Works well on larger hogs and deer without wasting a lot of meat. ~500 yds of range with plenty of power. My 223 I use to varmit with. Yotes up to deer with proper bullet and shot placement. 34 grain is a prairie rat death sentence....:what::beer:
__________________
"You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one."
-- Rush Limbaugh, in a moment of unaccustomed profundity

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

"MOLON LABE" - Come and get them, can't be any plainer than that!
dwmiller is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 01:26 AM   #72
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 3,479
Liked 2302 Times on 1369 Posts
Likes Given: 1240

Default

I think my Ruger SR762 is a keeper. I put a 3# Timney trigger in and it shoots 1 to 1 1/2 MOA with most loads.
My Ruger SR556 is about a 1 1/2 MOA rifle and had a fair trigger, also a keeper.
__________________
An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!
JimRau is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 01:10 AM   #73
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,649
Liked 1310 Times on 743 Posts
Likes Given: 633

Default

I shot this big boar yesterday with my DPMS LR-260H. Nah,an AR isn't worth a hoot for hunting!

Ar hunting ? - Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion
__________________
Lifetime Member-
NRA
Texas State Rifle Association
North American Hunting Club
Txhillbilly is offline  
deg Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:09 PM   #74
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,698
Liked 2611 Times on 1484 Posts
Likes Given: 2004

Default

This month's F&S claims MSRs [Modern Sport Rifles] (20%) are now

out selling "traditional" hunting rifles (14%) as of 2013 polls.

So I would say "AR hunting" is already a valid and

popular practice, at this point.

Last edited by therewolf; 04-19-2014 at 08:17 PM.
therewolf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:48 PM   #75
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montana
Posts: 447
Liked 210 Times on 139 Posts
Likes Given: 128

Default

All of the AR's I've owned ( with a free float fore end anyway) are as accurate as most bolt actions. With a little load development and a good optic groups of 3/4" at 100 yards are common. My Bushmaster Varminter with heavy 24" barrel and a 6-18x scope would do 1/2" groups. Most hunting I've done with the Ar has been prairie dogs with the Varminter. I don't consider the .223/5.56mm a big game caliber, but have on occasion shot smaller deer at closer ranges with them and it did the job. I recently bought a Remington R-25 in .243. It comes with a Mossy Oak Treestand camo job. If you are only going to hunt deer, ( or bigger game) an AR in .338 Federal, .308, 7mm-08 or .260 Remington would be better than the smaller calibers, but not as good for varmints. For deer AND varmints, it's hard to beat a .243. Nearly double the energy of a .223, better in the wind and more game bullets available. Very flat shooting and much less recoil than the .308 and larger. I love the .308, I have 2 of them, but don't enjoy shooting varmints with them like the smaller calibers. A pic of the Remington .243, I just put a better scope and higher mount on it than the one in the picture. A Minox 4.5-14x with BDC, under $300 but the glass (made in Wetzlar Germany) blows away my Vortex Viper, Nikon M-308 and Leupold VX-III. I believe that Zeiss and Leica use the same glass from Wetzlar. I compared it to a Zeiss HD 5 that costs 3 times as much and I could not see an appreciable difference. I loaded up some Hornady 87 grain V-MAX to try but the wind has been unbelievable out here in the open plains, 40 to 60 mph the last few days, hard to get good groups to test loads in that kind of wind. The lighter varmint bullets in .243, like the 55 and 58 grain ones can get 3800 fps. and are truly "Varmint grenades", but are pretty stubby in length and lose velocity faster. I went with a heavier longer 87 grain Hornady V-Max, theoretically should be more accurate than the extreme light bullets, and I will use a Nosler 90 grain Accubond for deer and antelope. The two bullets have a similar B.C. and should simplify things not having to learn way different drop values like I'd have to do if I used a 55 grain for varmints and a 105 grain for deer.
dsc01529.jpg  

Last edited by sandog; 04-19-2014 at 08:49 PM. Reason: add photo
sandog is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 03:35 AM   #76
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,624
Liked 2220 Times on 1525 Posts
Likes Given: 820

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
A bad shot with a big magnum caliber is the same as a bad shot from a "varmint" round. Put the round in the vitals and deer will drop. The operating issue with any firearm is the monkey yanking the switch.

Eskimo folks use the weak little 5.56 all the time shooting polar bears.... not exactly what I would call a bear round but they do it.
Not exactly, hunting is a game of inches. If you make a clean shot with a 22 LR or a 7mm the deer is going down. The difference is the size of the wound channel. If you shoot a large game animal you are going to have a small wound channel and very little hydrostatic shock. Given you have such a small wound channel there is very little margin for error and you are limited on the shots you can take.

Not every shot is perfect. The woods are full of limbs that will deflect a 5.56 very easily, turning your perfect shot into a marginal or even wild shot. A larger caliber with it's larger wound channel and huge amount of hydrostatic shock will still down the deer. I have seen a bunch deer go down on the spot with a spleen shot from a traditional deer rifle.
John_Deer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 03:57 AM   #77
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Hookeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,022
Liked 326 Times on 218 Posts
Likes Given: 26

Default

Yup, a little extra can be a bit of insurance, since nobody controls everything in the field.
Hookeye is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Hunting in LA ptroxclair Louisiana Gun Forum 3 12-27-2013 07:27 PM
It Ain't Hunting But.... alsaqr Hunting Forum 10 10-09-2013 02:21 PM
hog hunting 1911beast Hunting Forum 25 03-19-2012 07:14 PM
22 hunting 1911beast Hunting Forum 3 12-20-2011 02:21 AM
All about hunting cobra22 Hunting Forum 2 09-03-2009 12:42 AM



Newest Threads