Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > .308 or 7.62x39?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2007, 02:01 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default .308 or 7.62x39?

OK, I'm sold. I want a Saiga (Russian-made AK variant; looks like the best deal since the nickel cup of coffee. NIB for under $300).

Next question: .308 or 7.62x39? I need some help here.

I don't hunt; the weapon will be for defense only, especially in case of disaster of one kind or another (SHTF, e.g.). I live in a large city (Dallas), if that's relevant.

Here's what I know: the .308 has greater recoil, but also greater range and hits with more authority. The AK round has less range, less power, and less recoil, and is the ammunition the gun was designed for.

Here's what I don't know (sorry if I sound like Glenn Beck): relative accuracy; price and availability of ammo; if the .308 is significantly harder on the gun and will shorten its working life.

Comments? Advice? Insults? Whatever you've got...

Thanks.

__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 08-20-2007, 09:21 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Default

7.62 Commie is a helluva lot cheaper and easier to find than surplus 7.62x51 or even .308 that isn't loaded with hunting projectiles.

I'd probably spend a bit more and just get a standard Ak. WASRs aren't much more and while they are the red headed step child of the Ak world(is that even possible?) everything I have read about them is they do work.

I wouldn't worry about accuracy. I'd expect combat accuracy from that rifle. Ak's and their variants were meant to work, be accurate enough to hit a man out to 4-500 meters and be simple enough for even the dumbest conscript to keep running. I don't think even the Dragunov is all that accurate.

__________________

Last edited by Etho; 08-20-2007 at 09:24 AM. Reason: cause i can
Etho is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2007, 03:54 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
allmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 364
Default If cost is a strong incentive

Then you will probably need to look at the 7.62X39. Ammo is very reasonable and it is a fairly accurate round. The .308 has the ballistic edge, and can be more accurate - BUT, the Saiga was designed as a shooter, not a MOA weapon. At 50 yards, I can bounce soda cans using iron sight with my .223 Saiga. That's good enough for me.

So, considering your choices, my vote would be the 7.62X39.

__________________

Fire everyone in Congress NOW.

allmons is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2007, 03:56 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BLS33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 607
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Another vote for 7.62x39. It is a proven battle rifle round and cheaper.

__________________

Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed, and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by Man.
- Jack Handey

BLS33 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 03:15 PM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 9,887
Liked 2549 Times on 1338 Posts
Likes Given: 192

Default Saiga

I would go commie. The mags for the .308 are not easy to find and will not likely get any easier. If you want a .308 get a rifle designed to be a .308. My personal preference would go
1. HK-91
2. CETME
3. M1A
4. AR-10
5. FAL

I know, I will get flamed for putting the FAL on the bottom of the list. I just happen to have an HK and a CETME I like the M-1A but do not like the weight/lack of pistol grip. The AR-10 is very much like the AR-15's I have but are expensive. The FAL has a rep for needing gas adjustments, different mags for inch pattern and metric. I just never got into the FAL hoopla. I have shot them and they are fine and I would not kick one out of bed for eating crackers, just not my cup of tea right now.

__________________
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 11:20 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 10 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default 7.62x39

There's no way that the standard will consistantly hit a man size target at 500 meters!







[QUOTE= Ak's and their variants were meant to work, be accurate enough to hit a man out to 4-500 meters and be simple enough for even the dumbest conscript to keep running. I don't think even the Dragunov is all that accurate.[/QUOTE]

__________________
stalkingbear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2007, 01:19 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Longmont
Posts: 426
Default Go 7.62x39

For strictly defense, reliability, ease of control and ammo price, the winner is 7.62X39 .

Basically a 30-30 auto in performance and good to 200 yards on a man size target.

All ammo is going up but with no more 308 surplus on the world market due to UN Ban on sale, 308 is around $ 450-550 per thousand.

AK Mags are cheap and guns handle well.

FYI:
A quality FAL with decent ammo will leave an HK or M1A in the dust and they DO NOT require frequent gas system adjustment. Our FAL MG has over 100K rounds thru it and runs flawlessly. At 500 yards and iron sights, a man size target has NO chance !

__________________
Dgunsmith is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2007, 05:10 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
"OK, I'm sold. I want a Saiga (Russian-made AK variant; looks like the best deal since the nickel cup of coffee. NIB for under $300).
Next question: .308 or 7.62x39? I need some help here."
This is a case of 'You get what you pay for...',
How much is your life worth? ($300 apparently...)

Doesn't matter what chambering you get it in, it still has a crap Russian production barrel, so it's not going to be accurate.

Quote:
"...be accurate enough to hit a man out to 4-500 meters"...
NO PRODUCTION AK has ever been able to hit a torso size target consistently at 500 meters.
It was actually built to engage at ranges between 75 and 150 yards.
(and at 150 yards, things are a little shaky!)

.308 will give you a little more knock down power at closer ranges, but you are still going to miss everything beoynd 250 yards anyway, so the energy at the target doesn't matter since you won't deliver TO the target at 500 meters.

If you had gone with a M1A or AR-10 in .308 you could have had extremely accurate semi-auto that would be a tack driver at 500 meters...
-------------

Cart before the horse thinking...

If you want to shoot out to 500 meters,
Then start with the short list of semi-auto rifles that will be ACCURATE at 500 meters!
And work the list down from there...

I don't think anyone with any experience with SEGA would put it on a 300 meter list, and it doesn't have a chance at 500 meters.

Match grade AR-10, NM grade M-14, ect.
You won't get any of these for $300 either...
Start about $1,000 for a reasonable used and go up to about $4,500 from there.

Personally, I like my AR-10's in .308 and my new one in .300 WSM really kicks butt!
--------------------------

Quote:
"All ammo is going up but with no more 308 surplus on the world market due to UN Ban on sale, 308 is around $ 450-550 per thousand."
Surplus doesn't do 3" groups at 500 yards anyway...
Surplus is lucky to do 18" at 500 yards.
Volume or accuracy, it's hard to have both!
__________________

Last edited by AR Hammer; 09-29-2007 at 05:19 AM.
AR Hammer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 06:09 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Recon 173's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 191
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

My vote would be for the 7.62 x 39 BUT I would also suggest that you look at getting some sort of scope for it too. Now, I know that some people think that an AK-47 type rifle shouldn't have a scope on it because it makes a lousy sniper rifle. But what I'm looking at here isn't using it as sniper rifle but to increase the rifle's over all accuracy within the framework of 0 to about 250 meters distance. In other words, from one location out to about 2.5 city blocks or so, if needed. If I were living in a built-up area like Dallas, especially with all those tall buildings all around, I would want to have a little better than average AK for vertical shooting as well as being able to control a couple of blocks near me too. Unless you mount a scope on a AK type rifle, you could very quickly find yourself at a disadvantage to a guy with another rifle. The scope does not have to be an expensive one. A decent 4X to 6X scope will probably do the job needed to increase a guy's survival chances a bit better.

__________________
Recon 173 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 10:57 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DSAPT9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 49
Default

I to would go for the 7.62x39 if I were not all ready set up with ARs and FALs.

The FAL will shoot all day long just set the gas system to 5 on most guns and let her rip. I currently shoot 180gr hunting loads in both Federal and Remington and have for years. Cheaper than surplus ammo at the moment and I use it to hunt with.

__________________

Have a good one!

Remember:
Plan for the worst, Hope for the best and if you land on your feet running life is good!!!

DSAPT9 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
7.62x39 sks sporter value Please sharpshooter AK & SKS Discussion 10 02-27-2012 10:28 PM
Saiga 7.62x39 AK MrBombastic AK & SKS Discussion 3 06-07-2009 02:41 AM
7.62x39 & 7.62x54r supergus Ammunition & Reloading 10 01-08-2009 05:42 AM
7.62x39 vs. 22-250 hay General Rifle Discussion 9 12-14-2008 11:25 PM
7.62x39 Ermac AK & SKS Discussion 14 11-19-2008 05:48 AM