 |
|
09-20-2009, 03:56 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 107
|
NEW AR .22s-S&W vs Colt?
Hi, Gun Bunnies-
I was in a Sportsman's Warehouse (man, what a dreamy place!  ) the other day, and saw the Colt .22 AR clone, marked at $599. As I lovingly caressed it, I began to (already) have some adulterous  thoughts, in the form of the S&W version, in the same caliber. Perusing the Smith website (later) I was reminded that their's is (at least) $100 bucks cheaper, the only negatives being the loss of the Colt name (admittedly worth a lot) and a 5-round (30/25) reduction in mag capacity. But, the boys from Mass also give me the advantage of a poly upper/lower (ala Bushmaster's Carbon-15), reducing weight, and removing any worries about (future) potential corrosion.
Can anyone give me any different perspective(s) on this dilemma, or should I just grab the Smith, and (after paying for it, of course  ) run?
Great test report on it:
Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22, AR-15 Style .22 Long Rifle Semi-Automatic Carbine
|
|
|
09-20-2009, 09:15 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,413
|
Both are fine firearms. The Colt is actually made by Walthers in Germany and besides the dust cover not being functional, for show only, the Colt is as good a choice as there is.
The Smith is also a fine dedicated .22 cal. firearm. Although it's less expensive than the Colt it is becoming a popular choice. The first three we received in stock I sold the first weekend.
You can't beat the .22 and the AR format only makes them more enjoyable to own IMO. Shoot Straight, Stay Safe.
__________________
God, Family, Guns, in that order.
|
|
|
09-20-2009, 09:58 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 107
|
NEW AR .22s-S&W vs Colt?
Thanks, Joe-
I assume you own a gun shop, then?  Appreciate the input/advice. 
How much are you getting for the Smiths? Haven't actually seen one of those,
yet-to get a (firm) price. If you were buying one for personal use, which
would you choose?
.22s go 'pop'!-cheaply (still).
Still Wondering-
Last edited by themanbeau; 09-20-2009 at 10:06 PM.
Reason: Added sentence.
|
|
|
09-21-2009, 10:46 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,413
|
I actually work part-time at a firearm store/indoor shooting range. The Smiths are selling for 480.00 ish. I have not shot either firearm, although, I don't think one is better than the other. I have gotten good reviews from customers on both firearms. It just a matter of personal choice.
Let me throw another firearm into the mix. Have you seen the GSG 5 yet? This is another very nice auto-loading 22.
__________________
God, Family, Guns, in that order.
|
|
|
09-21-2009, 10:51 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
|
Have you seen the GSG 5 yet
|
Yes, the Walther, right? What do they go for? And what about that new
10-22/AR? How much for it?
Thanks, again-
|
|
|
09-21-2009, 11:11 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 147
|
I have the Colt and am extremely happy with it. The dust cover is definately NOT just for show. Mine works great and snaps open when I pull the charging handle. My gun is VERY accurate and is one-hole accurate at 25 yards with CCI and Federal ammo. It took me about 500 rounds to properly brake her in. I shot CCI Mini Mags exclusively until then and then started shooting American Eagle stuff. Now mine shoots all brands with no issues EXCEPT Remingtons for some reason. Anyway, I am extremely pleased with the gun and even though the S&W has a great set of features, the Colt is pretty much a mirror of a standard M4....that, the all metal construction (the receiver us aluminum) and the prancing pony logo was why I bought it.
|
|
|
09-21-2009, 11:16 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
The Ruger SR22 is a "gussied up" version of the 10/22 so it should be very reliable. The manufacturer website says 625 suggested retail. The link to it is in my thread "new ruger AR".
__________________
Sometimes you earthlings REALLY amaze me!
|
|
|
09-22-2009, 04:58 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 268
Liked 12 Times on 12 Posts Likes Given: 56
|
I got a S&W 15-22 about a month ago. It cost me $450 (included tax) and I have been VERY happy with it. The rails are standard picatinny and since I had a lot of spare parts from an AR I sold a few years back, I put a few on the S&W. I added a carry handle, rail covers, vertical grip and a sling and that's all I really plan to do. I've shot around 300 rds through it and it is FUN to shoot! I haven't tried any real "target" shooting with it but I can easily hit soda cans at 75 yds all day long with the gun using the iron sights. The photo below is a shot of my gun.
__________________
"... Americans... we want a safe home, to keep the money we make and shoot bad guys." -- Denny Crane
|
|
|
09-22-2009, 05:07 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 107
|
NEW AR .22s-S&W vs Colt?
Cool  gun/pic, RA-
Believe it or not, I know where Longview is, too. I've even BEEN there. 
You are the first real, live owner of the S&W version I've had contact with.
Did you make a comparison to the Colt? Or the Walther? I don't think the Ruger
was out then, right?
Do you plan on doing an Appleseed with it? I know that Fred says that .22s
are fine for it. It looks really light, and compact. I think I'm leaning that way,
especially if I can duplicate your price.
Thanks for the good post-
|
|
|
09-22-2009, 05:54 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 268
Liked 12 Times on 12 Posts Likes Given: 56
|
There were two Colts and the Ruger at the store along with the S&W. I liked the Colt "Tactical" version of the AR-22 and considered buying it. It was almost exactly the same as the S&W but metal. OTOH, it was a good bit heavier then the M&P and cost about $150 more. The weight might be okay with a larger caliber gun but these guns shoot the .22LR. There is literally no recoil to deal with so I prefer the lighter gun. Also, all the controls are functional on the S&W, unlike the Colt. To me, the S&W seemed to be the best buy for the dollar of the three makes so I went with it.
I actually got the gun so my kids and I could both use it. It's light and has the adjustable stock so they can shoot it now but still lengthen the stock as they get bigger.
__________________
"... Americans... we want a safe home, to keep the money we make and shoot bad guys." -- Denny Crane
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|