MkII Target vs 22/45


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion > MkII Target vs 22/45

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-16-2011, 05:10 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Cory2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryville,Tennessee
Posts: 575
Liked 9 Times on 5 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default MkII Target vs 22/45

Quick question, besides the grip angle what is the difference between a ruger mkII Target and a Ruger 22/45?



__________________
God created men. John Moses Browning made them equal.

Check out my blog:http://ithinkforme.blogspot.com/
Cory2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-16-2011, 06:25 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

The main difference is the 22/45 is a polymer framed gun with 1911 situated controls. The mk2 is steel frame with a heel type mag release. The mk3 also has the thumb mag release instead of the heel mag release of the mk2.



__________________

Sometimes you earthlings REALLY amaze me!

stalkingbear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 06:36 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Cory2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryville,Tennessee
Posts: 575
Liked 9 Times on 5 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stalkingbear View Post
The main difference is the 22/45 is a polymer framed gun with 1911 situated controls. The mk2 is steel frame with a heel type mag release. The mk3 also has the thumb mag release instead of the heel mag release of the mk2.
Thanks, I was just curious because I have a mkII target and was looking at pictures of 22/45's and couldnt really tell a difference. I think I will stick with my steel framed mk2
__________________
God created men. John Moses Browning made them equal.

Check out my blog:http://ithinkforme.blogspot.com/
Cory2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 07:17 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 33 Times on 28 Posts

Default

I didn't like the 22/45. It didn't at all feel like my 1911. It felt like a 1x3" piece of oak. The corners were sharp and painful. The overall fit and finish was not what I would expect from a quality Ruger MkII or MkIII pistol. I went with the Neos over the 22/45...

Thats just me.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 08:35 PM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,400
Liked 5499 Times on 2871 Posts
Likes Given: 357

Default

Ive got one of the new threaded barrel 22/45 its very accurate and extremely reliable once the mag safety and loaded chamber indicator are disabled. A couple weekends back i ran 1000 rounds through it with no failures.

Other than the grip angle they differ in that the 22/45 mk3 come with a defective magazine safety that can cause the mag to have the wrong angle as it presses on the follower the last few rounds causing jams. It also has a chamber indicator that auickly gums up with dirt and can cause fail to eject issues. With those disabled its a damn good gun.

Just my opinion on one sample.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 09:36 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CHLChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,523
Liked 190 Times on 129 Posts
Likes Given: 89

Default

One of the major "benefits" of the 22/45 is the 1911 set-up. But when I handled one, the safety was in the same place, but felt nothing like a 1911. You have to kind of squish your thumb into the button to toggle the safety.

I ended up with a Buck Mark, which I love. But the safety on it is pretty lame, too. I can barely operate it with several fingers, much less just my thumb. I don't need a safety on a .22, though. I'm not carrying it, just shootin' stuff for fun.

__________________
.45acp, .40 S&W, 9mm, .38 Spl, .380 acp, 22lr
12 gauge, .223/5.56x45mm, 30-30 Winchester


2 Chron. 7:14 Christians must seek His face
CHLChris is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 03:00 AM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,400
Liked 5499 Times on 2871 Posts
Likes Given: 357

Default

if your looking to replicate the feel of a 1911 in a 22lr the sig 1911-22 or gsg 1911-22 are about the only realistic option.



__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger 22/45 v MkII or MkIII ? Wheelspin Semi-Auto Handguns 6 07-07-2010 11:45 PM
Ruger P85 MKII woolu Semi-Auto Handguns 10 03-29-2009 04:05 AM