Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f21/)
-   -   MkII Target vs 22/45 (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f21/mkii-target-vs-22-45-a-43944/)

Cory2 06-16-2011 05:10 PM

MkII Target vs 22/45
 
Quick question, besides the grip angle what is the difference between a ruger mkII Target and a Ruger 22/45?

stalkingbear 06-16-2011 06:25 PM

The main difference is the 22/45 is a polymer framed gun with 1911 situated controls. The mk2 is steel frame with a heel type mag release. The mk3 also has the thumb mag release instead of the heel mag release of the mk2.

Cory2 06-16-2011 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stalkingbear (Post 523978)
The main difference is the 22/45 is a polymer framed gun with 1911 situated controls. The mk2 is steel frame with a heel type mag release. The mk3 also has the thumb mag release instead of the heel mag release of the mk2.

Thanks, I was just curious because I have a mkII target and was looking at pictures of 22/45's and couldnt really tell a difference. I think I will stick with my steel framed mk2 :p

cpttango30 06-16-2011 07:17 PM

I didn't like the 22/45. It didn't at all feel like my 1911. It felt like a 1x3" piece of oak. The corners were sharp and painful. The overall fit and finish was not what I would expect from a quality Ruger MkII or MkIII pistol. I went with the Neos over the 22/45...

Thats just me.

JonM 06-16-2011 08:35 PM

Ive got one of the new threaded barrel 22/45 its very accurate and extremely reliable once the mag safety and loaded chamber indicator are disabled. A couple weekends back i ran 1000 rounds through it with no failures.

Other than the grip angle they differ in that the 22/45 mk3 come with a defective magazine safety that can cause the mag to have the wrong angle as it presses on the follower the last few rounds causing jams. It also has a chamber indicator that auickly gums up with dirt and can cause fail to eject issues. With those disabled its a damn good gun.

Just my opinion on one sample.

CHLChris 06-16-2011 09:36 PM

One of the major "benefits" of the 22/45 is the 1911 set-up. But when I handled one, the safety was in the same place, but felt nothing like a 1911. You have to kind of squish your thumb into the button to toggle the safety.

I ended up with a Buck Mark, which I love. But the safety on it is pretty lame, too. I can barely operate it with several fingers, much less just my thumb. I don't need a safety on a .22, though. I'm not carrying it, just shootin' stuff for fun.

JonM 06-17-2011 03:00 AM

if your looking to replicate the feel of a 1911 in a 22lr the sig 1911-22 or gsg 1911-22 are about the only realistic option.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.