 |
|
03-05-2012, 04:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wichita,Kansas
Posts: 4,026
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts
|
It depends on how "true to spec" you want it to be. The rifle has specific parts and specs per military. I'm not sure which barrel fits those specs better but the WOA SPR profile barrel I had was nice.
__________________
“The bitterness of poor quality Lingers long after The sweetness of low price is forgotten.”
-John Ruskin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin
"The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together."
|
|
|
|
03-05-2012, 05:36 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 574
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
That's one of the reasons I chose these 2, they both are in spec. I'm trying to get the best value for the money, but I will not sacrifice quality to save a buck. Both barrels are in my price range, and in spec with the profile and rifling. The MOD 0 has a mid length gas tube and the MOD 1 has a rifle length gas tube, both have 1-7 twist, .75 diameter gas block.
I have heard a lot of good things about WOA barrels, and I like the fact it's a 223 wylde chamber. The SPR spec is for a 556 NATO chamber, but 223 wylde will shoot both. I've talked to a few gunsmiths and a few military snipers, marksman, and firearms instructors, and they explained to me difference between 223 rem, 223 wylde, and 556 NATO chambers.
I originally want a 1-8 twist because I didn't think the 1-7 would shoot 55 grain FMJ good because of the low weight, but my Sig M400 is a 1-7 twist and it shot 55s great. So I want the SPR spec.
Thank you for information, it's appreciated. I'll make my final choice tomorrow morning after I do a little more research and get some more feed back.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 01:58 AM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver,Wa
Posts: 80
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't both WOA and Wilson Combat barrels machined from Shilen blanks? Either way you can't go wrong with either one. Very good quality, high standards, and great reputation. The only factor I think you should consider is do you want a stainless steel barrel or a chrome moly.
__________________
Vince
United States Marine Corps '94-'00
“No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave.” -Calvin Coolidge
"The deadliest weapon in the world is a Marine and his rifle." -Gen. John "Black Jack" Pershing, U.S. Army
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 02:02 AM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 12,662
Liked 1922 Times on 1069 Posts Likes Given: 89
|
just for the barrel itself its close in quality. so close its a toss up. if you order a dozen from each and use a machine rest prolly half the wilsons will beat half the white and vice versa.
my wilson 20" heavy barrel shoots waaaaay better than i do and im not half bad with open sights.
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 06:39 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 574
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vmkeith
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't both WOA and Wilson Combat barrels machined from Shilen blanks? Either way you can't go wrong with either one. Very good quality, high standards, and great reputation. The only factor I think you should consider is do you want a stainless steel barrel or a chrome moly.
|
WOA are Wilson arms blanks, but Shilen make WOA's ultra match barrels, I don't know who make Wilson combat barrels.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 07:08 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Traverse City,MI
Posts: 204
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
So far I've built 3 AR's, (all for my personal use), each one has a Wilson barrel. They all shoot .2"-.3" groups.
__________________
”You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass.”
~Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 04:07 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 574
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 75370
So far I've built 3 AR's, (all for my personal use), each one has a Wilson barrel. They all shoot .2"-.3" groups.
|
What barrel lengths and at what distances, and is that Wilson combat or Wilson arms?
|
|
|
03-08-2012, 03:42 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 574
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JonM
just for the barrel itself its close in quality. so close its a toss up. if you order a dozen from each and use a machine rest prolly half the wilsons will beat half the white and vice versa.
my wilson 20" heavy barrel shoots waaaaay better than i do and im not half bad with open sights.
|
For my build I think I'll go with the Wilson. I've done my research and the 18" SPR barrel from Wilson Combat, will last a while longer and shoot just as accurate if not more than the white oak. If it shoots like crap I'll just buy the white oak after I sell the Wilson, but I think the Wilson should do well. Thanks for the wisdom.
|
|
|
03-08-2012, 03:43 AM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 574
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 75370
So far I've built 3 AR's, (all for my personal use), each one has a Wilson barrel. They all shoot .2"-.3" groups.
|
Either way, that's descent shooting.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|