Wary of MOE.
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > Wary of MOE.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2012, 02:30 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 416
Liked 23 Times on 17 Posts

Default Wary of MOE.

I'm building a designated hunting rifle in .300 blk and I'm wondering would MOE hand guards affect its accuracy since they aren't free floating. Anyone know?

__________________
broke-again124 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 05-19-2012, 02:41 PM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,567
Liked 5659 Times on 2956 Posts
Likes Given: 374

Default

for hunting it doesnt matter. and either wa its only fractions of an inch at hunting ranges either way. you dont see any real benefit from free float tubes until you get way past any ethical hunting distance.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 04:42 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,548
Liked 1003 Times on 705 Posts
Likes Given: 1002

Default

I agree with JonM, most free float rails that are installed aren't taken advantage of by the shooter. Either due to skill level or their intended use or even ammo type.

MOEs are an excellent low cost, low weight handguard.

__________________

______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together. You'll remember the quality of a gun long after you forget how much you paid for it.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek

Quentin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 05:40 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 416
Liked 23 Times on 17 Posts

Default

Any quad rail that rivals the MOE guards weight benefit?. (or lack of weight)

__________________
broke-again124 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 05:54 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Car54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sun, Sand, and Palm Trees,Fla.
Posts: 2,114
Liked 109 Times on 46 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broke-again124 View Post
Any quad rail that rivals the MOE guards weight benefit?. (or lack of weight)
I use one of these on one of my 300Blk hunting guns:http://www.shootertactical.com/UTG-PRO-Model-4-15-Carbine-Length-Symmetrical-Split-Slim-Rail-System---Black--MTU001S-.html

It's strong and lightweight and made in the USA now.

If you are going to be on foot doing a stalk quite a bit, going lightweight as you can with your rifle. If you'll be stand hunting, it won't matter a whole lot.

The last hunt I went on I took my heavier 300Blk figuring I would be in the stand most of the time. Turned out later that afternoon I was on foot stalking until dark and I wish I had my lighter rifle with me.
__________________

"As an American, I was not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on the same credentials"...Newt Gingrich


The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.

Car54 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 06:01 PM   #6
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,567
Liked 5659 Times on 2956 Posts
Likes Given: 374

Default

not at the moe price point. just dont go cheap on ff tubes, cheap as in quality. rra, mi, dd, troy and a few others are excellent quad rails. i dont see the need for em on a hunting gun. you can add rail setions on moe guards for lights and such.

drop in tubes are just like the moe guards you dont mount sights or optics on them.

if your going to mount optics or sights on the forward rail your going to want a rail that attaches very solid and can be aligned with the upper receiver rail.

ive got a ff tube with halfquad rails on my 458 socom. carrying it sling it digs in the back. i havent humped it any great distance yet but i think i wouldnt like the sharp edges.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...


Last edited by JonM; 05-19-2012 at 06:03 PM.
JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 07:52 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,427
Liked 40 Times on 39 Posts
Likes Given: 25

Default

People don't realize how heavy MOEs are. I went from a MOE to Samson. The rifle was noticably lighter w/ the Samson.

IWC makes mounts that do not require those little rail sections. Helps keep weight down and reduces points of failure.

If your using a sling the FF is a better choice when you start putting a good amount of pressure on the sling.

I'm a big fan of tubes like the Troys and Samsons.

__________________
MikeJK is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 08:03 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AgentTikki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: City of Lost Angels, Kommifornia
Posts: 3,444
Liked 335 Times on 264 Posts
Likes Given: 51

Default

I'm actually quite impressed with Midwest Industries SS gen2 rails. A little lighter and cheaper than Samsons and Troys. Uses a factory nut. Lots of extras included. But like most of these lightweight rails, they heat up quick, but also cool down pretty quick too. And they bolt on nice and tight. They also come with alot of extras, including a barrel nut, rail sections, bipod (swivel) stuff and qd rail section.

MI isn't usually know for great lw products but this one is quite impressive. The overall diameter is also a bit smaller than my Samson Evo/Rainer Arms rail. So if you want a thin, lightweight tube, I'd recommend it.

__________________
Assumption is the mother of all ****ups.
Know what you know, Know what you don't know. -Paul Pedzolt
"Jack of all trades, master of none, though oftentimes better than master of one" -Mynshul
AgentTikki is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 08:08 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,427
Liked 40 Times on 39 Posts
Likes Given: 25

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentTikki View Post
I'm actually quite impressed with Midwest Industries SS gen2 rails. A little lighter and cheaper than Samsons and Troys. Uses a factory nut. Lots of extras included. But like most of these lightweight rails, they heat up quick, but also cool down pretty quick too. And they bolt on nice and tight. They also come with alot of extras, including a barrel nut, rail sections, bipod (swivel) stuff and qd rail section.

MI isn't usually know for great lw products but this one is quite impressive. The overall diameter is also a bit smaller than my Samson Evo/Rainer Arms rail. So if you want a thin, lightweight tube, I'd recommend it.
Smaller diam. might be nice. I will say it's hard to believe they can be lighter than a Samson though. The included extras are nice. Don't they use the old Troy style mounting system? I have had a few Troys and never a problem but I hear others talking about the threads stripping. Like I said they have been GTG for me.
__________________
MikeJK is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 09:48 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
purehavoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Not where I wanna be
Posts: 4,745
Liked 1129 Times on 734 Posts
Likes Given: 2017

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJK View Post
People don't realize how heavy MOEs are. I went from a MOE to Samson. The rifle was noticably lighter w/ the Samson.

IWC makes mounts that do not require those little rail sections. Helps keep weight down and reduces points of failure.

If your using a sling the FF is a better choice when you start putting a good amount of pressure on the sling.

I'm a big fan of tubes like the Troys and Samsons.
Mike I gotta call BS on this one , unless your removing the front iron sight then I will give ya that and say you are right as that thing does weigh a ton , but its going to be pretty hard pressed to say that any of the samson rails are lighter than a MOE in mid length or any length . I looked them all up just to put myself in check and low and behold I was right
__________________
purehavoc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Should we be wary of FEMA Chester Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 05-12-2008 01:28 AM