Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   AR-15 Discussion (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f20/)
-   -   Ruger SR556 (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f20/ruger-sr556-43742/)

Byrdguy 06-11-2011 02:18 PM

Ruger SR556
 
Anybody have any experience with the Ruger SR556?? It looks like a well made piece and I'm thinking about springing for one. I'm an AR Noob and would appreciate any input.

Quentin 06-11-2011 06:40 PM

I wouldn't buy it, especially for a first AR. Unless you have a real reason to choose it over everything else - it's heavy, expensive and doesn't do one thing better than a standard DI AR that costs hundreds less.

To be fair, I haven't fired one, just handled them at the gunshop.

mjkeat 06-11-2011 06:49 PM

No personal experience but I havent heard to many good things about them.

JonM 06-11-2011 10:16 PM

used to have one. my opinion: DONT BUY ONE!!!!

while they are reliable you cannot use a milspec upper on the ruger lower. the triggers are simply horrid. for the money they cost it should at least have a half decent trigger. as noted above very very heavy for what it is.

the sr556 upper does not fit on milspec lowers. i would bet the trigger area is slightly out of spec as well.

i traded mine in on a springfield 1903a3 and was happy about it.

the rails cant be removed they are double roll pinned in (one inside the other very very tightly) so if you get a little dirt or moisture under the rail your screwed when it starts to rust. the piston rod cannot be lubed or cleaned.

sr556 no bueno

Quentin 06-12-2011 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonM (Post 521324)
used to have one. my opinion: DONT BUY ONE!!!!

while they are reliable you cannot use a milspec upper on the ruger lower. the triggers are simply horrid. for the money they cost it should at least have a half decent trigger. as noted above very very heavy for what it is.

the sr556 upper does not fit on milspec lowers. i would bet the trigger area is slightly out of spec as well.

i traded mine in on a springfield 1903a3 and was happy about it.

the rails cant be removed they are double roll pinned in (one inside the other very very tightly) so if you get a little dirt or moisture under the rail your screwed when it starts to rust. the piston rod cannot be lubed or cleaned.

sr556 no bueno

Wow, great post, JonM!

Many piston ARs at least have a milspec lower, didn't know Ruger's wasn't. Byrd, I think you got your answer... :(

JonM 06-12-2011 01:17 AM

dont get me wrong they are very good shooters very reliable and not prone to heat build up long as you dont mind the drawbacks. mine was very very accurate once you worked past the mushy creepy glocky feeling trigger

Flint Rock 06-12-2011 02:28 AM

I have an SR556 and am very pleased with it. It wasn't cheap, $1,350 plus tax, but if you compare it to other AR rifles optioned out the same (or a Sig 556) then it is right in there with any other brand. Yes the rifle is a tad heavier than some, but that weight also seems to settle the rifle down in rapid fire. I believe I can shoot the SR better on the move than I can my other brand AR's. The difference is small mind you, but the hits on the target tell the story. I have read the complaints about the trigger and to be honest I don't feel a difference between the Ruger, a Bushmaster, or a Smith.
Ruger has a lighter version of it's 556 now. 14.5" barrel with a 1.5" flash suppressor and a fluted barrel. That should address the weight issue for some, but like I said, I like the extra weight. Besides, I've hung gee wiz gadgets:D and lights;) on mine that have driven the weight up even more:eek:.
I am now a firm believer of the chromed bolt. I can run 100's of rounds of Russian ammo through the Ruger and still just pull out the bolt and wipe it clean in a minute. Rock River also has some models that come with the chromed bolt (I like the specs of the Elite Operator 2) if you want to stay with a traditional gas system.
For a first AR I probably would go with a less expensive base model. The caution is, if you start hanging gear on am AR you will drive the money and weight up.

MrMilspecer 06-12-2011 11:30 PM

Your in the same price range as a Daniel Defense.They weigh a tad over 6lbs and are very good ARs. Ruger makes some great stuff but you can do better in the AR world.

goretro77 06-14-2011 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint Rock (Post 521444)
I have an SR556 and am very pleased with it. It wasn't cheap, $1,350 plus tax, but if you compare it to other AR rifles optioned out the same (or a Sig 556) then it is right in there with any other brand. Yes the rifle is a tad heavier than some, but that weight also seems to settle the rifle down in rapid fire. I believe I can shoot the SR better on the move than I can my other brand AR's. The difference is small mind you, but the hits on the target tell the story. I have read the complaints about the trigger and to be honest I don't feel a difference between the Ruger, a Bushmaster, or a Smith.
Ruger has a lighter version of it's 556 now. 14.5" barrel with a 1.5" flash suppressor and a fluted barrel. That should address the weight issue for some, but like I said, I like the extra weight. Besides, I've hung gee wiz gadgets:D and lights;) on mine that have driven the weight up even more:eek:.
I am now a firm believer of the chromed bolt. I can run 100's of rounds of Russian ammo through the Ruger and still just pull out the bolt and wipe it clean in a minute. Rock River also has some models that come with the chromed bolt (I like the specs of the Elite Operator 2) if you want to stay with a traditional gas system.
For a first AR I probably would go with a less expensive base model. The caution is, if you start hanging gear on am AR you will drive the money and weight up.


I have both an SR556 and a Sr556C, very very pleased with both, they shoot accurately and have never had any failure to feeds or ejects. Trigger pulls were the biggest complaint for me but I knew that going in. They felt very similar to my Colt LE6920 though, so no biggie but I still replaced both with a drop in trigger from Chip McCormick. The Sr556C is lighter due to fluting the heavy barrel under the Troy rails.

Don't forget that Ruger throws in Troy rails and front and rear battlesights as well as Hogue grip - this is a few hundred bucks on their own. Quality? Right up there with a COlt in my opinion. How does it shoot? Well you have to try on your own but their both very sweet shooters. I will always grab these two along with my Colt and FN SCAR 16s when I hit the range.

Rugers make great ARs for the money their short stroke piston designs have proven themselves well thought out and just run and run.

goretro77 06-14-2011 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin (Post 521377)
Wow, great post, JonM!

Many piston ARs at least have a milspec lower, didn't know Ruger's wasn't. Byrd, I think you got your answer... :(

As per Ruger the transfer rod does not need servicing, so I listen to Ruger and leave it be, I've put about 6000 rounds through mine now and so far its worked great. I clean the gun after every range outing, cleaning the gun is very simple and the bolt carrier group stays very clean. The piston comes out easy and its easy enough to clean.

As for the lower, what exactly is not 'milspec' about the Ruger lower? I like to know since I have taken my Ruger lower and connected it to my Colt LE6920 out of curiosity and it worked just fine. The Ruger upper will mate with any AR lower.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.