Polymer AR-15 lower - Page 5
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > Polymer AR-15 lower

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2012, 10:26 PM   #41
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
 
okdonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
Posts: 2,816
Liked 240 Times on 208 Posts
Likes Given: 69

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottA
And since when is seeking a lower cost option a bad thing?
Never. There will be options for ANYONE all the time. Some people have different liking, budgets, setups and etc. At the end of the day, we are all just gun enthusiasts or hobbyists.
okdonk is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 10:44 PM   #42
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
EW1066's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 343
Liked 130 Times on 72 Posts
Likes Given: 23

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottA View Post
And since when is seeking a lower cost option a bad thing?
Seeking to save money is NEVER a bad thing. However, especially in the context of this conversation, it's a trade off and therefore not real savings. To steal an old addage. "You can have light weight, high quality, or cheap. Pick any two."

EDUB
__________________
When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.

Thomas Jefferson
EW1066 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 11:47 PM   #43
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BenLuby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 2,181
Liked 78 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottA View Post
And since when is seeking a lower cost option a bad thing?
Too many people confuse inexpensive with cheap. They are not interchangeable terms.
__________________
What part of 'shall not be infringed' confuses people?
BenLuby is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 12:53 AM   #44
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
purehavoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Not where I wanna be
Posts: 4,792
Liked 1148 Times on 744 Posts
Likes Given: 2039

Default

$110 for a complete poly lower is cheap , Myself I would rather spend another $50 and have a complete mil specd alum lower.
$104 PSA Lower kit with stock and buffer tube , and $56 LRB stripped lower . Now you got something that will last a long long long time not to mention looks alot better
purehavoc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 01:17 AM   #45
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,094
Liked 6659 Times on 3543 Posts
Likes Given: 498

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottA View Post
And since when is seeking a lower cost option a bad thing?
i dont think its necessarily a bad thing long as you dont have unrealistic expectations. so far poly ar15 lowers have a very very poor track record.

when you go for a lower price in an extremely competitive area you need to reduce overhead. either staffing costs, production costs or materials costs. or a combination of all three.

with poly lowers its a duo of materials and production costs. plastic is cheap. its also cheap to mold. thats why things like pmags and magpul stuff tend to be lower cost. they are also pretty durable.

someone may figure out a good formula for lowers but im not convinced its been done yet. if it ever is ill be there looking to save some weight!!
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 06:32 PM   #46
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fsted2a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,269
Liked 260 Times on 207 Posts
Likes Given: 398

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottA View Post
Apparently H&K is satisfied with the strength of polymers. Example the XM8 platform.

I fully expect that the majority of new small arms development will rely very heavily upon polymer construction moving forward.
A few of the units that had discretionary funding tried the XM8's in afganistan with mixed reliability results. Some held up great, some cracked like cheap toys. I think they have potential, but more R&D is needed.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
Liberty is the well-armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin
fsted2a is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Let's see some polymer M14sRock Semi-Auto Handguns 18 06-08-2009 05:47 PM
Polymer AR Lower Shingles44 AR-15 Discussion 2 02-27-2009 05:48 PM



Newest Threads