Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > New M4 contract goes to ... FN!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2013, 12:36 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
purehavoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Not where I wanna be
Posts: 4,519
Liked 975 Times on 644 Posts
Likes Given: 1768

Default

Good FN is more knowledgable in this platform anyway and produces a better weapon IMHO.



__________________
purehavoc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 12:43 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,206
Liked 378 Times on 244 Posts
Likes Given: 1288

Default

Colt's gonna have some excess production capacity soon.
Watch for the availability of colts ot increase.

Maybe since now they will not be married so much to the carbine platform and start producing mid lenghts.



__________________
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Primary Rifle:
LWRC M6A2 w/ Eotech512

Primary Handgun:
Ruger GP100 Royal Phoenix
bluez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 05:01 PM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,360
Liked 4715 Times on 2692 Posts
Likes Given: 3731

Default

FN is a premier armsmaker.

I wrote to them a few years ago and asked for an AR-15 to be produced.

THEY WROTE BACK THAT THE GOVERNMENT DEMANDED, AS PART OF THEIR MILITARY CONTRACT THAT THEY REFRAIN FROM PRODUCING THE AR-15 FOR THE CIVILIAN MARKET.

I wish there was some way that could be challenged in court.

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 07:48 PM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sam78's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 66
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus
FN is a premier armsmaker.

I wrote to them a few years ago and asked for an AR-15 to be produced.

THEY WROTE BACK THAT THE GOVERNMENT DEMANDED, AS PART OF THEIR MILITARY CONTRACT THAT THEY REFRAIN FROM PRODUCING THE AR-15 FOR THE CIVILIAN MARKET.

I wish there was some way that could be challenged in court.
Wow! Our government really trusts us, don't they?
__________________
Sam78 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:50 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
climate17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 39
Default

The non-civilian thing is easy to interpret as anit-gun. It's actually just logistics. They don't want civilian input to effect the weapon choice. It's actually much less political for them that way.

__________________
climate17 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 04:16 AM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,202
Liked 602 Times on 363 Posts
Likes Given: 233

Default

I'll take as many of the Colts that the military doesn't want as I can afford. Maybe now Colt can innovate and build a carbine with a folding front sight, one piece trigger guard (Colt 6900 series), cold hammer forged barrel (team up with DD), and use the improved geometry bolts (LWRC and JP Enterprises). More awesome, reliable, inexpensive carbines and rifles for us lowly civilians.

The military can have the FNH USA carbines and rifles. FNH makes quality stuff and I don't care who has the contract so long as they make GTG weapons for our military and police.

I really want Colt to come to Texas so the company can be as free as it can from the clutches of the evil libtards. While we're at it, I wish we could send all the Kalifornians back to their failed state to help keep Texas free. Colt, MagPul, and Texas go together like peas, carrots, and Jennay.

Eye may not be uh smart maan, but I know what Colt iyuz.

__________________
kbd512 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 04:24 AM   #17
Lifetime Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Vikingdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains,CA
Posts: 13,041
Liked 7299 Times on 4239 Posts
Likes Given: 9403

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by niteglock View Post
Why are any others better than any others? People just like the different stamps.
Id rather have a snake or spider on mine than a butterfly or bunny rabbit. Lol.
Feinstein is proposing that all snake, spider or other "scary" rollmarks will be banned. Anyone who has a scary rollmark must have it removed and replaced with a bunny, daisy, daffodil or ladybug. Roses cannot be used due to their having defensive thorns. All black rifles must be destroyed or colored white with pink polkadots.
__________________

Shoot me an email at vikingdad995@gmail.com

Check out the Firearmstalk Podcasts with Vikingdad and DrFootball! https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/firearms-talk-podcast/id778007899

Quote:
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
- Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography, page 446.
Vikingdad is offline  
locutus Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 05:19 AM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,202
Liked 602 Times on 363 Posts
Likes Given: 233

Default

I hope Senator Feinstein does not think ill of my little pony carbines.

In any case, I think the camas or oleander are appropriate flowers for the AR-15.

__________________
kbd512 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 07:16 AM   #19
Concealed Carry Instructor
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 1,900
Liked 864 Times on 574 Posts
Likes Given: 216

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam78 View Post

Wow! Our government really trusts us, don't they?
They trust me more than I trust them!
__________________
AR10 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:42 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,360
Liked 4715 Times on 2692 Posts
Likes Given: 3731

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by climate17 View Post
The non-civilian thing is easy to interpret as anit-gun. It's actually just logistics. They don't want civilian input to effect the weapon choice. It's actually much less political for them that way.

Perhaps. But it infuriates nonetheless.

I may be mistaken, but I honestly believe that FN can fill military contracts to MilSpec, jump through any hoops the bureaucracy imposes, and still turn out several thousand civilian AR-15s per week the same time.


__________________
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Remington wins contract for M4s Quentin AR-15 Discussion 26 04-29-2012 08:37 PM
40 Cal Federal Expanding Gov't Contract Factory 2nds ok? ARnoob Ammunition & Reloading 3 03-14-2011 03:17 AM
Rare Colt 1903 WWI US Navy Contract Pistol BigBeerBellyMan Curio & Relic Discussion 11 01-27-2011 03:15 AM
Defence Dept contract insanity zhuk Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 03-09-2010 12:55 AM
Colt ww2 38 Super Military Contract tl1000ata 1911 Forum 0 05-13-2009 09:16 PM