most popular gas system di direct impingement or gas piston?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > most popular gas system di direct impingement or gas piston?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2012, 06:20 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 44
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default most popular gas system di direct impingement or gas piston?

What do you have? What do you prefer?

__________________
Abc1911 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 10-27-2012, 06:27 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,630
Liked 247 Times on 169 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abc1911
What do you have? What do you prefer?
Whats the diffrence between gas and piston
__________________
Ultimate_sig is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 10:31 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 176
Liked 27 Times on 21 Posts
Likes Given: 18

Default

Piston connects the bolt carrier to a piston that extends into the gas tube. When the gas goes through the tube it acts directly on the piston and pushes the bolt carrier back into the receiver.

With DI the gas enters the bolt carrier and spreads the carrier and bolt apart. As it spreads the carrier is pushed backwards from that force alone, kind of like a swimmer pushing off the end of a pool. Recoil is much lighter this way. Less stress on your rifle as well. Only problem is fouling inside the carrier and some seepage into the receiver. It's no big deal. The upper receiver comes right apart and you can remove your bolt and soak it in kerosene or whatever you're using to remove the carbon buildup.

Piston is seen as more reliable akin to the AK47. The AR adaption of the piston is not the same, though. The AK47 has loose tolerances throughout, while the AR is more of a modular precision instrument.

If you want to eliminate the recoil buffer tube, you'll require a piston setup that relocates the recoil spring to the piston. This is the only benefit I see from it, and it doesn't quite justify the price for me.

I'd prefer the lighter recoil of the DI. If you want a piston rifle, you can practically get two 5.57mm AK's for the cost of one mid grade factory AR.

__________________

Last edited by slog; 10-27-2012 at 10:34 AM.
slog is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:36 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Texgunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 71
Likes Given: 23

Default

I prefer the simplicity of the original DI system. Keep the rifle clean and it'll run fine.

__________________
Texgunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:50 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Rhino24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 82
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texgunner
I prefer the simplicity of the original DI system. Keep the rifle clean and it'll run fine.
He said it best. DI system , cleaning it after a range trip. And it will eat anything you feed it.
__________________
Rhino24 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:50 PM   #6
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,578
Liked 5664 Times on 2958 Posts
Likes Given: 375

Default

I would argue that the ak47 is more like direct impingement than a piston. The ak doesnt have a seperate piston in a block up front that smacks an oprod. The whole thing moves rearward. The ak just has a very long gas key that extends up towards the gas block while the ar15 uses a tube to get the gas to the gas key on the bolt carrier.

I think its incorrect to say the ak47 is a gas piston gun as thereis no seperate piston transfering gas energy to an oprod.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
locutus Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 03:10 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,312
Liked 5708 Times on 3227 Posts
Likes Given: 5137

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
I would argue that the ak47 is more like direct impingement than a piston. The ak doesnt have a seperate piston in a block up front that smacks an oprod. The whole thing moves rearward. The ak just has a very long gas key that extends up towards the gas block while the ar15 uses a tube to get the gas to the gas key on the bolt carrier.

I think its incorrect to say the ak47 is a gas piston gun as thereis no seperate piston transfering gas energy to an oprod.
Excellent point, Jon. I'd never looked at it from that angle.
__________________
“We sleep safely at night because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would harm us.”


Winston Churchill
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 03:24 PM   #8
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,217
Liked 2558 Times on 1250 Posts
Likes Given: 1286

Default

Honestly it depends upon what the individual wants. In all my years with the AR-15 Rifle System and Direct Gas Impingement system I have never had any problems. This is due to the fact that all the weapons I have had has the correct Gas Port Hole and Buffer installed. So when it comes to reliability there are no difference in reliability which is the main factor. One thing I would suggest is that one needs to always cleaning the bore of the rifle with the Front Sight in the up wright position not in the down position allowing solvent to drain into the gas port hole. You have a hydraulic action when pushing the cleaning patch and solvent as well as gravity which could cause a problem. The Gas Piston System must also have the correct Gas Port Hole dimension. There are issues where people talk about the Gas Piston System keeping the Receiver cleaner and there is some truth to that. But who allows their weapon to get dirty to the point that either system stops working. Not most of us for sure. The only other issue is the AR Gas Piston System are more expensive. One other caution! Never buy a retrofit kit that is not completely designed to be a Piston System.
The Cam pin will eat out aluminum on the interior of the Receiver. The Bolt Carrier will tilt as it is forced back and begin to damage the Receiver, Extension Tube and Buffer Retainer area of the weapon. So for advise if you choose a Gas Piston System be sure it was designed from the ground up to be a Piston System. The one I prefer over the others is the Adams Arms Upper Receiver.
There are others out there that are OK!

03

__________________

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

-- John F. Kennedy

Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 03:35 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,548
Liked 1003 Times on 705 Posts
Likes Given: 1004

Default

I prefer direct gas impingment. As has been said it's simple and it works fine in a standard AR. Now if you want a short barrel or suppressed AR then there can be advantages to piston. 14" and up, not so much unless you've got a thing about white gloves.

__________________

______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together. You'll remember the quality of a gun long after you forget how much you paid for it.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek

Quentin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 04:38 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AgentTikki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: City of Lost Angels, Kommifornia
Posts: 3,444
Liked 335 Times on 264 Posts
Likes Given: 51

Default

Di wins by an overwelming numbers. And prolly by another factor of 10,000:1 if you factor leo/miltary procurements.

__________________
Assumption is the mother of all ****ups.
Know what you know, Know what you don't know. -Paul Pedzolt
"Jack of all trades, master of none, though oftentimes better than master of one" -Mynshul
AgentTikki is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Direct impingement or gas piston? rugerry AR-15 Discussion 11 08-29-2012 10:44 PM
ATI Ar15 Fix Retrofit Gas Piston System Cope's Distributing Sponsor Display 0 06-06-2011 02:17 PM
Why Gas Piston over Direct Impingement? urban Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 30 01-24-2011 08:30 PM
R.A.R. Revolution with custom piston system RARGuns Sponsor Display 0 01-06-2011 02:09 AM
But I Want a Gas Piston System Dillinger AR-15 Discussion 11 05-14-2010 03:27 AM