Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > Increasing the Reliability of the Ar-15

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2011, 11:46 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
diggsbakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pueblo,Colorado
Posts: 1,680
Liked 8 Times on 5 Posts

Default Increasing the Reliability of the Ar-15

OK, so I'm originally an AK man. I lived to shoot them (among others) for years. I love to break them down, modify, accessorize and just make improvements in general to them that makes the more effective. The hardest thing to improve was (is) the accuracy. As we all know it is simply the Achillies heel of the AK-47 and there isn't much (outside of major modifications i.e. re-barreling) we can do to improve that.

Now then. . . I'm thinking the same thing about the AR-15 in regards to reliability. I've had quite a bit of luck with them overall, however failures DO happen every time I go to the range. They are all easy fixes, but nevertheless it is something I'm not used to. Just as I was not used to being able to hit a 10" steel plate at 200 yds over and over with a 1x magnification optic.

So I ask. . . What (if any) are some modifications and/or improvements that are available or you have used to improve the reliability of this rifle. Mags and Ammo are a Give In and Don't count here!!!

I ordered a bolt enhancement kit from Bushmaster (only for my basic model BCGs) and know that the Bolt/carrier group is the heart of the AR and a good one is necessary for reliable function. So which one do you use?

Do you see an advantage to using a chrome bolt in a standard carrier?

Is the nickel boron the answer?

Lets Talk!

__________________
diggsbakes is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 03-06-2011, 12:08 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dog2000tj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,309
Liked 3734 Times on 1824 Posts
Likes Given: 13269

Default

Aside form the different friction/protection coatings that I have seen some do I thought this might be beneficial,

POF-USA Patriot Ordnance Factory, Inc.

I haven't installed one but it would reason that anything part that can reduce wear and tear would be a plus.

Or maybe I'm just an idiot

__________________

Member: NRA GOA

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD

dog2000tj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 12:29 AM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,366
Liked 5459 Times on 2851 Posts
Likes Given: 353

Default

my first AR15 was a colt sp1 i bought new in the box in 1986. amma was like 5$ per 50 and milsurp was in the area of 50$ per 500. i put a LOT and i mean a lot of rounds downrange. i dont remember that rifle every having a failure to feed or extract. i still have it today. ive since retired it recently building up a RRA lower dpms upper with an m16A1 barrel. i dont have much rounds through that one but it hasnt failed yet.

i think its like anything else mileage varies.

back in the 80's ak47 were in the 90$ range everyone i knew had one or two and ive seen ak's with their share of stove pipes and jams. i just dont ascribe to the reliability myth of the ak47 platform. they are firearms like anything else no better. they jam they misfeed no worse or better than ar15's.

i keep my guns oiled well lubricated and clean. i inspect them frequently for wear and oncoming failures. so when i go out to shoot i seldom have any issues.

if you build a quality AR15 with parts that work it will function just fine. the key for an AR15 to function well is a well fitting bolt carrier and bolt with a prroperly headspaced barrel/extension. if you have a problem AR15 checking for the correct head space and carrier bind is the first thing to do.

but like 1911's the further the weapon drifts from m16A1 specs the more issues will crop up. the more crap you hang on a semi auto rifle without tuning the recoil buffer spring the more fails your gonna have. this is true for any semi-auto or full auto.

weight absorbs recoil an overloaded semi will not function correctly. doesnt matter if its a ar or ak. however the ease of putting junk like 6 different optics huge rails 4 or 5 flash lights extra mags etc all will have some impact on the weapon's ability to cycle correctly.

if you have ever spent anytime with m203 equiped m16's you will come to hate that configuration. it is extremely prone to jams due solely to the thing's weight.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 12:38 AM   #4
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,088
Liked 2342 Times on 1169 Posts
Likes Given: 1189

Default

Digs,

I will start off by saying I have never had any significant failures to feed with any of my ARs. And after almost 25,000+ rounds through my oldest AR and 8.5 years I have had only a handful 4 or 5 of malfunctions. Probably due to mags or ammunition not the rifle. I have even re-barreled her once already in 2007. It is hard to rule out Magazines since they are the number one cause of AR Malfunctions. Junk ammunition being shot in a good AR is another as you mentioned. I certainly do not want to offend anyone with my following comments and that is not the purpose. The purpose is to express what I see in the industry. All I hear is AR parts are AR parts. Quite the contrary. There are good parts and there are junk parts. There are so many people making these parts of which the tolerances vary all over the board. From what I have experience the issue comes when the guys building them are buying parts from every tom dick and harry and expecting them to be top quality, match and function in conjunction. Or weapons built by some back yard garage builder. Not saying I put the skilled guys on this forum in that class. I do NOT! There is a lot of skill here! I would say however that if you get parts from the top companies it should eliminate these problems. And I always tell the guys. Just because they are new parts does not guarantee they are good parts! A new AR Rifle should have Zero problems if it is a quality piece and built correctly, despite present belief. The other issues are that some manufacturers will cut barrels down to meet production leaving the original size gas port hole causing the weapon to run hot or out of time. (over gassed!) To get back at your direct question. Manufacturers will sometimes polish the M-4 Feed Ramps and you can too with a Cratex polishing cone or tip. But they forget to relieve the aluminum lip on the Upper Receiver leading into the M-4 Feed Ramps. Causing the cartridge lip to catch and jump up when entering the barrel extension and chamber. This is a little industry secret and most ARs will even feed frangible rounds if this is done. So that is my tip for the day! Anyone having feed problems should check this out "After determining the Magazine is not the problem. One last thing that will save you a lot of frustration and problems. Is get one good magazine that functions flawlessly. Put it into a tupperware container to protect it from any damage. And only use it to diagnose magazine problems, feed problems,function problems, Bolt Catch problems and more. This will be one of the most valuable tools in your tool kit! Next to the Throat Erosion & Head Space Gauges! We call it the Armorer Magazine! And only you and God touches it!!!
Take care and good luck with all your future ARs and AR builds!

03

__________________
Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 04:35 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,510
Liked 971 Times on 682 Posts
Likes Given: 972

Default

I'd say a chrome or nickel boron bolt/carrier is a total waste of money since a good quality phosphated BCG (chrome lined) can be 100% reliable if you keep it well lubed.

I'm curious why you'd get a bolt enhancement kit from Bushmaster though, why not BCM? I'm assuming you're talking about a upgraded extractor kit?

Anyway, I have an ArmaLite and Daniel Defense BCG and both ARs are 100% reliable with cheap steelcase on up to good 62gr 5.56. I have not fired anything outside the range of 50-62gr. I have yet to have any malfunction with the two year old ArmaLite upper or the month old Daniel Defense (both midlengths). This is rather amazing since I've done a lot of swapping lowers and buffers. I really thought I went too far with an H2 buffer in the ArmaLite but it cycles low powered steel case just fine.

Of course my AK (WASR) has gone 4 years without a malfunction!

__________________
Quentin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 04:52 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
M14sRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,539
Liked 32 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 45

Default

For reliability, I have not found a better upgrade than the Defender "D" ring for increased extractor tension.

Mandatory in my ARs.

__________________
NRA-Life
CRPA-Life

SAF-Life
PEIAPOI


"Obama has ordered the launching of more Tomahawk cruise missiles than All the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined."
M14sRock is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 05:29 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
russ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Grand Junction,Colorado
Posts: 1,016
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Well, I'm really thinking that my next upper build will be a DI and unless someone can give me a good reason not to, it's going to get a FailZero BCG in it.

__________________
russ is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 06:02 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,510
Liked 971 Times on 682 Posts
Likes Given: 972

Default

Russ, the only reasons I can give are the BCM and Daniel Defense BCGs are 100% reliable and half the price of FailZero. And that I don't buy FailZero's claims that you can run their BCG dry. No doubt it's a good unit but I'd still want to lube it.

__________________

Last edited by Quentin; 03-06-2011 at 06:05 AM.
Quentin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 03:01 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mjkeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wichita,Kansas
Posts: 4,026
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts

Default

I had a FailZero BCG. Nothing wrong w/ it just decided to go another direction. It was very slippery making it easy to clean. My LWRC has a BCG coated in a similar fasion as the FailZeros. I will say the two DD BCGs and the Spikes work wonderfully. BCM and DD will more than get the job done for less money.

__________________
mjkeat is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 03:22 PM   #10
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,088
Liked 2342 Times on 1169 Posts
Likes Given: 1189

Default

Rock,

The following comment is not meant to be in anyway offensive. But for information purposes only! Keep in mind the D Rings put 3+ times the amount of pressure on the Extractor Claw when extracting the case. I certainly would not suggest anyone use any of the steel cast ammunition in their rifle when using a D-Ring. Increasing the possibility of damaging the Extractor. Brass is more forgiving. Personally I have never needed to use a D Ring on a rifle in over 20 years in the industry. I do recommend using the "Black Extractor Insert and Spring". It is the highest durometer and used on most all select fire weapons to promote reliability. I do know of one company who had about 3000 rifles they sold in Texas that would not extract reliably. Not to mention they put the wrong front sight assembly on the rifles! So they sent the agency D-Rings to correct the problem, rather than correcting the real cause. Quality of parts!
Bottom line is if it helps! Use them but keep an eye on your Extractor. When you run your finger across the Extractor Claw it should feel "Sharp" to the touch.

03

__________________
Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger GP100 Reliability ?? mvharris23 Revolver Handguns 25 06-20-2012 12:49 AM
Reliability User Name Semi-Auto Handguns 10 11-11-2009 12:16 PM
AR Reliability 1984cj AR-15 Discussion 15 11-08-2007 01:08 PM
Kel Tec P-11 reliability JHendrix General Handgun Discussion 3 11-01-2007 05:35 AM
MP5 Reliability HK94s and SP89s gunguy453 Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 1 07-06-2007 05:08 PM



Newest Threads