 |
|
11-20-2008, 04:26 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,470
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
|
Difference between AR-10 and AR-15
I'm sure this has been answered several times before, but I've search this site, googled, and checked wiki, but can't find a full answer.
What's the difference between the AR-10 and the AR-15 platforms?
|
|
|
11-20-2008, 04:42 AM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
AR-10 varies a little from the typical AR-15 design. The main difference is that it's chambered in .308.
|
|
|
11-20-2008, 01:33 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3452 Times on 1597 Posts Likes Given: 3590
|
^ Pretty much spot on with what Matt said.
The design differences are very small, but the overall size of the chamber on the upper, the mag well and the spacing of the Take Down and Pivot Pins is larger on the AR-10 to handle the larger size and larger gas pressures of cartridges like .308
JD
|
|
|
11-21-2008, 02:01 AM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,470
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
|
So, if I'm to understand you, the AR-10 is a larger caliber/heavier receiver/action/chamber version of the AR-15. Ok, that makes sense.
Can you confirm my other conclusions below?
From what I've gathered from my research, the AR-10 tends to have a shorter overall length than the AR-15, correct?
The AR-10 is what the M-16 is based on, and the M-16 is what the AR-15 is based on? Correct?
Darn, I had another question here, but can't for the life of me think of it tonight.
Thanks for the answers!
|
|
|
01-20-2012, 10:52 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spokane
Posts: 68
|
No, it's not shorter and it is also heavier and far more expensive.
All these rifles are related - and yes, the AR series started as a different caliber than it currently is. Although Wikipedia is not a definitive source, it's a start...
|
|
|
01-20-2012, 11:11 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: somewhere in....,Oklahoma
Posts: 2,185
Liked 56 Times on 45 Posts
|
Are you referring to the original AR10, or what is currently the AR10?
__________________
"Life's tough. It's tougher if you're stupid." -- John Wayne
|
|
|
01-20-2012, 11:16 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: somewhere in....,Oklahoma
Posts: 2,185
Liked 56 Times on 45 Posts
|
AR10 left, AR15 right. Buttstock is the same size. Both are "carbines". The size of the receiver is the most notable in the pic. BCG, etc follow suit.
__________________
"Life's tough. It's tougher if you're stupid." -- John Wayne
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 04:55 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 5,405
Liked 312 Times on 268 Posts Likes Given: 299
|
Any reason why this thread was resurrected?
__________________
__________________________________________
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together.
You'll remember the quality of a gun long after you forget how much you paid for it.
__________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 08:38 AM
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 13,055
Liked 3513 Times on 1723 Posts Likes Given: 521
|
Time warp. Definitely a time warp.
Or posters that did not look at the DATE OF THE THREAD THEY ARE RESPONDING TO !!!!
GUYS! Question was asked in 2008.
__________________
What we have heah is.... failure to communicate.
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 09:26 AM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 667
Liked 22 Times on 19 Posts
|
Lol thats funny
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|