Concerning "Co-Witnessing" Optics: is it necessary?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > Concerning "Co-Witnessing" Optics: is it necessary?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2011, 09:28 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Default Concerning "Co-Witnessing" Optics: is it necessary?

As much as I love adding extra weight to my rifle, I just can't decide whether or not it's really worth it to utilize an optical sight as well as BUIS. While I have little experience with the AR platform compared to most of you gentlemen, I understand the concept of "ounces are pounds, pounds are a pain." If you already have a reliable optical sight, is it really necessary to have a pair of irons on the gun as well, and vice versa? I get that people wanna be prepared in case the battery runs out or there's some sort of technical malfunction, but that can't be common at all! I personally would prefer having one designated aiming device instead of two. It saves weight and money, I can train twice as hard with it, and in my humble opinion the rifle looks more streamlined and sophisticated.

I'm sure co-witnessing or some form of it is quite common among you guys. Can someone please explain to me why it's so popular? Thank you.

__________________
Rigor is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-26-2011, 09:34 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,604
Liked 1037 Times on 730 Posts
Likes Given: 1034

Default

Comes down to the two is one and one is none philosophy. Things break and backup irons can save your butt. Of course the recent torture test of a Daniel Defense M4 also proved the Aimpoint micro is tough as nails and probably not going to break. Its batteries last forever too.

As far as cowitnessing, why not if you have optics and BUIS. I do on both my ARs. Irons are not heavy, especially the MBUS models.

__________________

______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together. You'll remember the quality of a gun long after you forget how much you paid for it.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek

Quentin is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 09:40 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,757
Liked 5803 Times on 3030 Posts
Likes Given: 398

Default

im of the opinion optics are totally unneccessary in a combat rifle. just adds weight. i prefer iron sights as my personal training is oriented around their use. im also of the opinion optics are just a crutch for the untrained.

other folks obviously have a different opinion.

nothing wrong with using em if thats what ya want. how much weight and reliance you want on electronics is up to you.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 10:05 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Default

thanks for the replies. do you think the LWRC Skirmish Sights are a good buy, all pricetags aside?

__________________
Rigor is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 01:16 AM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,757
Liked 5803 Times on 3030 Posts
Likes Given: 398

Default

they appear sturdy enough from the pics. never seen any in person. if you get a set of sights whatever the make make sure they are the right size for your front gas block height if you dont have a one piece rail. if you do have a one piece rail make sure they are correct height for the rail.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 01:25 AM   #6
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,276
Liked 2621 Times on 1282 Posts
Likes Given: 1308

Default

Rigor,

As Jon stated the number one most important sight on a tactical or self defense rifle is the "Iron Sights". If a person does put an Optic on the weapon it is my belief that they should have co-witness capabilities should the optic fail. We would like to think that it would never happen, but may I remind you Murphy is alive and well! And when least expected especially in a rigorous application it could happen to the Optic causing the OH SH--T response and could cost you dearly maybe your life. So Irons always on a tactical or defense AR and Optics if you can co-witness or if they fail you are able to implement the iron sights readily.

03

__________________
Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 01:57 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mjkeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wichita,Kansas
Posts: 4,026
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts

Default

I disagree. Iron sights are very important and should remain on all firearms but from my experiences a good optic such as an Aimpoint is a vast improvement. A RDS is much faster on target and takes out the majority of the guess work making it more accurate in the long run. Not only that but a RDS allows both eyes open target acquisition allowing for better field of view making it faster to pick up your next target.

I would trust my life to an optic and have. With the technology they are very reliable and extremely rugged. I have personally never seen an Aimpoint or Trijicon fail. To add, a RDS in the hands of a trained person is a thing of beauty. As far as a crutch I strongly disagree. Is there such a thing as a crutch when your life is on the line? Why rely on old tech. when theres something stronger, better, faster available? Weight? How much does a H/T1 weight? Maybe a few onces? I hardly see that as a factor.

__________________

Last edited by mjkeat; 07-27-2011 at 02:03 AM.
mjkeat is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 09:21 PM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
EW1066's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 333
Liked 113 Times on 65 Posts
Likes Given: 22

Default

If your rifle is just a range toy and nothing more, leave the irons off. If, however, you are going to use your rifle for self/home defense, it is my opinion that you should have irons.

I personally believe that the nomenclature of sights and optics is WRONG. Instead of optics being considered the "primary" sighting device and the irons being relegated to "backup" status. The Irons should ALWAYS be considered "primary" and the optics should instead be considered the "enhanced" sighting system.



EDUB

__________________

When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.

Thomas Jefferson

EW1066 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 07:21 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Wambli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 947
Liked 46 Times on 28 Posts

Default

And here is the dissenting vote. If electronic sights are not that good an option then how come just about every military unit (SPECIALLY ELITE UNITS) run them. I personally have AIMPOINT, EOTECH and Trijicon red dots on my rifles and I have to say I can't recall the last time I saw a military grade red dot bite the big one. BUT IF IT DID, I guess BUIS would be nice to have (I have them in my SBR) but why not just practice shooting with the dot off. My drills all include dead red dot setups and it's not very hard to center punch anything within 50 yards COM by just centering the target in the optics. And while we are at it irons are all but useless as soon as the light gets a little dim, so you would not catch me dead with a HD setup that relies solely on irons.

BTW I hate truly co-witnessing sights. Anything that interferes with my clean sight picture on my red dots is just irritating to me. My rear BUIS fold down neatly out of the way and the red dot is on a rail elevated enough that my standard front sight is just barely on the bottom of my EOTECH.

__________________
Wambli is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 09:16 PM   #10
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,757
Liked 5803 Times on 3030 Posts
Likes Given: 398

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wambli View Post
And here is the dissenting vote. If electronic sights are not that good an option then how come just about every military unit (SPECIALLY ELITE UNITS) run them.
thats a false argument. military weapon system history is replete with bad choices and ill thought out ideas. just two of numerous examples:

1960's air to air missiles almost work and the pentagon decides to take guns off aircraft as they are "no longer needed"

1940's m4 sherman gasoline engines are easier to service than safer non explosive diesal engines. earning the nickname ronsons for the tank design.

just cuz the military does it doesnt lways equate with a wise choice.
__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
"Do "Gun-Free" Zones Encourage School Shootings?" cnorman18 The Club House 26 04-17-2012 09:57 PM
Old Revolver - "Revolvers Dreadnought" - "Azul" - Anyone familiar? stelliott80 Revolver Handguns 3 07-13-2011 10:52 PM
M&P 9mm Pro "Optics" help.... newguy22 Semi-Auto Handguns 5 05-24-2011 02:44 AM
Witloe Remington 1858 New Model Army "Lee" & "Grant" bprevolver Blackpowder & Musket 0 09-25-2008 11:11 PM