Colt M4 6920. Opinions, please
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > Colt M4 6920. Opinions, please

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2013, 10:11 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Kronous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 32
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default Colt M4 6920. Opinions, please

Thinking about acquiring one, but thought I would check the buzz first.

__________________
Kronous is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-14-2013, 11:43 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,668
Liked 2433 Times on 1428 Posts
Likes Given: 551

Default

they are a decent gun. Some will say Colt is the standard by which ARs should be measured.

There are some realy nice custom ARs out there though that are really nice if you prefere something already on the custom side. I'm personally not much of a colt fan boy because if mil-spec parts are used, then many manufacturers meet the standard. Some meet only the material requirement without the same level of assembly quality or checks on finish, (I have seen some Colts that had some defects as well). I guess seeing M16 and M4 rifles with various manufacturers roll marks has left me more open to the fact thta Colt is not magical in meeting the military standard. I've seen rifles with General Motors roll marks, FN, and others. They all worked fine.

If you can find one with no visible problems, and the price is right, then Colt is a good one to have, because if you ever do sell it, some Colt collector will pay more for it just becaue of the pony and the name.

__________________
SSGN_Doc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 12:23 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
hawkguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: austin,tx
Posts: 4,529
Liked 3198 Times on 1910 Posts
Likes Given: 2262

Default

they sold em at wal mart for just under a grand (i thought that was a great price!) before the madness began.

i just saw one back on the shelf today for the first time in about 4 months.... for 1400 .....hmmm....i dunno about 1400. first time i have seen a serious price jump at wal mart on firearms.

supposed to be a very respectable AR, although i am no expert on the matter.

__________________
hawkguy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 01:42 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Kronous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 32
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Thank you, it is part of a trade deal that I am thinking about. New in the box. The colt name perked my interest, but I had heard the quality concerns as well. If only Glock would go longgun, I would be set!!!

__________________
Kronous is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 03:06 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,668
Liked 2433 Times on 1428 Posts
Likes Given: 551

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronous View Post
Thank you, it is part of a trade deal that I am thinking about. New in the box. The colt name perked my interest, but I had heard the quality concerns as well. If only Glock would go longgun, I would be set!!!
I wouldn't worry too much about poor quality, if there is nothing visible that bothers you. Colt makes good stuff. I just don't put them on a pedestal like some folks. The stuff that I saw that I would consider quality control issues were mostly cosmetic, like rings in the finish, jacked up roll marks, finish flaws. Nothing mechanically wrong with them.
__________________
SSGN_Doc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 05:27 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,716
Liked 1100 Times on 774 Posts
Likes Given: 1114

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronous View Post
Thank you, it is part of a trade deal that I am thinking about. New in the box. The colt name perked my interest, but I had heard the quality concerns as well. If only Glock would go longgun, I would be set!!!
Quality concerns on a 6920? You've got to be kidding. Got links to these claims? You need better intel.
__________________

______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek

Quentin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 06:14 AM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,878
Liked 1266 Times on 706 Posts
Likes Given: 545

Default

If you can obtain a Colt 6920 for about 1K, get one. It's a solid 556 carbine. The carbine is worth the 1K asking price.

If you can get one with MagPul furniture, that would be my preference. I have a particular preference for the MagPul CTR stock, but a MOE stock will do.

There's nothing wrong with Colt quality. In fact, few manufacturers make 556 carbines of equal or higher quality for the same price. If you want to know where your money is going, it's quality control checks and slightly higher quality materials than commercial spec.

If you have more money and want a higher quality carbine, there are some manufacturers that will oblige you. Daniel Defense, Wilson Combat, and LWRC come to mind, but there are others.

As far as mil-spec is concerned, other manufacturers can and do make components to military specifications. Colt and the military formulated the Technical Data Package (TDP) for the M4 carbine and M16 rifle. If Colt doesn't know what mil-spec is, then no other manufacturer does.

As far as mil-spec is concerned, it doesn't mean "best", it means accepted for military use. Certain components, like chrome silicon springs, are better quality than military specifications and last longer.

In short, don't fixate on military specifications or this or that brand of 556 carbine. Although I've never had a quality issue with any Colt product I've owned (to date, three 1911's, six revolvers, and three AR pattern carbines and rifles), that doesn't mean that Colt can't produce a lemon. All machine tools, no matter how well made and irrespective of the materials used, will break or wear out with use.

As magazines go, I would not willingly use a Colt aluminum magazine over a MagPul PMAG except for range use. The Colt aluminum magazines are mil-spec quality and stepping on one renders it a not-very-effective paperweight. If you elect to use Colt aluminum magazines, I would purchase better springs for them but that's just me.

The only thing I find perplexing about the 6920 and carbines patterned after it is the M4 barrel profile. For military applications, namely mounting a M203 grenade launcher, it makes sense. From a functional standpoint, the 6520/6720 carbines are lighter and just as accurate for the intended design use.

__________________
kbd512 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Colt Le 6920 magpul edition OUDAN AR-15 Discussion 44 06-07-2013 01:34 AM
Colt AR opinions and value (pics) Powersportgiant AR-15 Discussion 7 07-04-2012 02:17 PM
Colt 6920 mag318 AR-15 Discussion 5 06-09-2011 03:56 AM
colt 6920 ar 15 owners hawkeye General Rifle Discussion 3 02-07-2010 10:06 PM
WTS: COLT AR15 LE 6920 Carbine $1649 AnchorArmament Sponsor Display 0 04-15-2009 08:15 PM