AR hunting calibers - Page 4
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AR-15 Discussion > AR hunting calibers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2013, 04:44 AM   #31
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 229
Liked 47 Times on 37 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangello

Yup, I paid about $350 for my SKS and some ammo in 2010 or so; the one I missed out on as a kid was under $100. I still have the Marlin Model 60 though.
Inflation isn't waiting for any of us.
__________________
rifleman77 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 06:20 AM   #32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TexasGunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,350
Liked 1069 Times on 484 Posts
Likes Given: 77

Default

I've taken a 220 lb mule deer with a 55 gr from the mini 14 I used to have. That sucker didn't take 2 steps. Not a round I rue comment hunting with, but if you are proficient you can use what you want. I typically use my Remington 700 in .308. I am about to have in all of my parts and assemble my first 300 blackout. This will be my go to hog gun as well as short range deer slayer. In the brush country my longest shot may only be 150-200 yards, so my .308 is not necessary.

Here's a comparison of the difference in case/bullet size between 5.56 and 300 blackout. The 5.56 is a 62 gr ss109 and the .30 cal is a 168 gr Sierra Match King. I hand load all my .308's and am working on my 300 AAC Blackouts right now.

image-3062283624.jpg

__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"

-- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
TexasGunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 06:47 AM   #33
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 560
Liked 223 Times on 171 Posts
Likes Given: 107

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darthjkf View Post
What about 7.62x39. Are those good?
Yes but with the same cautions I would give to a 223 hunter, you are going to have limited range, limited penetration and you need to read up on any bullet you want to use because not all will give you the kind of performance you need. Your big leg up on the 223 guys though is the .30 caliber round is more efficient at making wide wound tracts, much like a 30-30.
__________________
Apex-Predator is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 06:00 PM   #34
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 229
Liked 47 Times on 37 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex-Predator

Yes but with the same cautions I would give to a 223 hunter, you are going to have limited range, limited penetration and you need to read up on any bullet you want to use because not all will give you the kind of performance you need. Your big leg up on the 223 guys though is the .30 caliber round is more efficient at making wide wound tracts, much like a 30-30.
I thing the x39 has enough penetration. It's such a heavy bullet it will go through plenty of soft tissue. Just a lot of drop at range.
__________________
rifleman77 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Hunting Calibers VazDaGoon General Rifle Discussion 102 06-10-2013 05:43 PM
CQC calibers GrtWhytHype AR-15 Discussion 18 12-12-2012 06:18 PM
How many calibers do you own? Dearhunter The Club House 19 05-16-2012 04:46 AM
How many calibers do you own? Yunus General Handgun Discussion 145 05-13-2012 02:23 PM
Just 3 calibers audrey_z General Rifle Discussion 9 05-29-2007 09:37 PM