A couple of questions about my SKS.
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AK & SKS Discussion > A couple of questions about my SKS.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2010, 03:21 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DarinCraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,170
Liked 23 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default A couple of questions about my SKS.

I have a Chinese SKS that I really enjoy shooting, but it looks like crap in my opinion. I want to cut the barrel off from the bayonet lug forward, however...

1) If I cut the barrel off, will it effect the gas system to the point I have to enlarge the gas ports? (If it is even possible to get to the ports to enlarge them).

2) I know crowning the barrel improves accuracy, but is it really necessary under 150 meters?

3) If crowning is needed then who does it?

Thanks
Darin

__________________
Quote:
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks."
Thomas Jefferson
From the great speaker...er uh Barak Obongo

"Liberals make great proctologists. They're the only ones who truly know what the inside of an anus looks like."~me
DarinCraft is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-04-2010, 03:44 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 190
Liked 15 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
1) If I cut the barrel off, will it effect the gas system to the point I have to enlarge the gas ports? (If it is even possible to get to the ports to enlarge them).
It's possible,it's one of those thing you want know till you do it. Also 16" is the legal length on the SKS anything less will be illegal.

Quote:
2) I know crowning the barrel improves accuracy, but is it really necessary under 150 meters?
YES no crown or bad crown,no ACCURACY

Quote:
3) If crowning is needed then who does it?
Usually done by a qualified gunsmith with the necessary tools to recrown the barrel.
__________________
res45 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 12:18 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 202
Liked 23 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

"it looks like crap"? Why did you buy it?

You are willing to destroy the value, possibly impede the function, make the rifle illegal,decrease the accuracy....all for the sake of appearance?

Hmmm......

My advice is to do none of the above. Sell or trade for something that meets your asthetic requirements.

__________________
crockett007 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 01:32 PM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,006
Liked 2691 Times on 1405 Posts
Likes Given: 216

Default

The SKS is never going to win a beauty contest. It is a utilitarian rifle. If you want something attractive, get a pre 64 Winchester M-70 with a fancy walnut stock and "look" at it. If you want something to reliably launch lead down range leve the Simonov alone.

__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 06:42 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DarinCraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,170
Liked 23 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
"it looks like crap"? Why did you buy it?
I didn't buy it and yes it looks like crap.

Quote:
You are willing to destroy the value, possibly impede the function, make the rifle illegal,decrease the accuracy....all for the sake of appearance?
Destroy the value? Really? The value of a $150 gun? Your kidding right?

The function of the rifle? Did you really miss the premise of this post? Are you so hell bent on telling me that you think I am superficial that you missed the entire question of whether or not it WOULD effect the function of the rifle? Did you miss the question about how it would effect the accuracy?

MAKE IT ILLEGAL, where in the world did I say anything about the finished length of the barrel. Give me a break, I am a retired cop for crying out loud.

Seriously, if you honestly make a point to throw comments around that have absolutely no constructive impact and do not answer the questions then why don't you go somewhere that is encouraged. I asked a simple question and did not deserve to have your response. I have never done anything to you.

Quote:
Hmmm......My advice is to do none of the above. Sell or trade for something that meets your asthetic requirements.
The purpose of this forum is to ask questions and sometimes those questions involve modifications that make a firearm more pleasing to the eye. So do you not do any mods that effect the appearance of the weapon? Why don't you maybe take some lessons on how to talk to people a little more professionally and maybe you will find you will get the same respect back.


Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
The SKS is never going to win a beauty contest. It is a utilitarian rifle. If you want something attractive, get a pre 64 Winchester M-70 with a fancy walnut stock and "look" at it. If you want something to reliably launch lead down range leve the Simonov alone.
Thanks, I know it is a utility rifle, but all the junk that hangs off of the end of the barrel does not provide any function for me and generally takes away from the appearance. It is not so to me that I would want to get rid of it if I could not modify this portion, but if I could it would make the gun more enjoyable to me. As far as reliability of the rifle that was why I posted before I got out the chop saw...lol.

Thanks again Robocop,
Darin
__________________
Quote:
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks."
Thomas Jefferson
From the great speaker...er uh Barak Obongo

"Liberals make great proctologists. They're the only ones who truly know what the inside of an anus looks like."~me
DarinCraft is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 08:03 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

Have you consider a change of clothes for it, like a T6 Tapco stock set? I have one & it made a good deal of difference in the appearance of the little rifle to me (don't hate me traditionalists, it wasn't in wood when i got it). Also, if the sights at the front end bother you so much, maybe a gunsmith could remove them for you & mount you a side rail & scope mount to use a red dot or something instead of the iron sights? Kalinka sells something called a "molot" mount setup that will sposedly get the scope pretty close to the top of the receiver without the need for much carpentry on your stock.

Anybody got info on how hard it is to just remove the part of the barrel with the front sight? It doesn't look like it requires a hacksaw, but i haven't done it.

Regarding the gas ports, i have seen a thread on that "SKS Survivor's board" forum about adding a couple more very small holes to the gas tube to reduce the distance & velocity of ejected cases. It doesn't seem like that would be the hard part of your project.

http://www.sksboards.com/smf/index.php?topic=55742.0 Check out the pic in that thread with no sight upfront at all. http://www.sksboards.com/smf/index.php?topic=59533.0 Not sure which link is which, my people can be easily confused at times.

The guys at that site are helpful, but less tolerant of levity and language in the on-topic parts of the forum, FYI.

__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.


Last edited by orangello; 02-04-2010 at 08:14 PM.
orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 08:11 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,006
Liked 2691 Times on 1405 Posts
Likes Given: 216

Default

IMHO the only thing the SKS really "needs" is a little more length of pull. The stock was designed for small statured Soviet soldiers wearing heavy winter clothing.

__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 08:18 PM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
IMHO the only thing the SKS really "needs" is a little more length of pull. The stock was designed for small statured Soviet soldiers wearing heavy winter clothing.
That is one of the main things i like about that t6; the extendabuttstock fits me much better. It's also quite fashionable in its OD greenness.

I actually had a failure to feed on mine, last time i shot it; that was the first, even with the cheapo ammo i use.
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 09:22 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 202
Liked 23 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I really meant no disrespect. Not all SKS's are $150 guns. Some are quite valuable, depending on where and when they were made. Even altering a $150 gun, per your statements would probably render it worthless for resale. From your OP, I have no way of knowing you are retired LE. Since the barrel length is already @ minimum legal length any cutting would create an issue.

Again, I am not trying to be a smart aleck. I still recommend that the best/easiest thing to do is to sell it and get something that is more to your liking. There are alot of unknowns in the questions you propose. My only point.

I offer my apologies for offending you. I hope you will accept.

regards,
Steve

__________________
crockett007 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 09:39 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

Crockett, he may have one like my Chinese SKS with the 21.5" barrel, not sure.
I like having a couple of extra inches myself.

__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
very close to buying a k98, couple questions roosterjuicer General Rifle Discussion 3 08-16-2009 02:15 PM
A couple of questions about class 3/full auto purchasing Crispy129 NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion 1 06-26-2009 04:37 AM
I have a couple of questions edteach NFA/Class 3 & FFL Discussion 5 03-15-2009 08:59 PM
Ruger/Browning/CZ - Couple of Questions AmsterDan .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 4 02-16-2009 12:17 PM
Couple of questions Chaosut General Shotgun Discussion 3 12-26-2007 08:47 AM