Any Thoughts On The SKS?
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AK & SKS Discussion >

Any Thoughts On The SKS?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2013, 01:46 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,087
Liked 757 Times on 449 Posts
Likes Given: 477

Default Any Thoughts On The SKS?

I've been eyeing the Russian, Romanian, and Chinese SKS lately. Watched its prices go up and down everywhere. Anyone have any experience with the SKS? Pro and con?
PanBaccha is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 05-20-2013, 02:08 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
kytowboater's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 7,071
Liked 2432 Times on 1515 Posts
Likes Given: 53


I have a chicom sks. With the spike bayonet. I like it
Oh dern....

Revelation 19:11

And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
kytowboater is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 03:08 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
mich1377usmc's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Union County NC
Posts: 593
Liked 187 Times on 114 Posts
Likes Given: 148


^^++1 mine is a chicom " franken " sks w/ spike also, it shoots well with no problems for the past 25 years. In fact my wife has now laid claim to it..... LOL
mich1377usmc is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 03:24 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Overkill0084's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,730
Liked 3272 Times on 1642 Posts
Likes Given: 437


Pro: More fun than anything that inexpensive has a right to be.
Con: If your a big guy, the Chinese version has a stock that is proportioned for ...well...Chinese. Feels a lot like a youth model rifle. A Tapco adjustable stock took care of that.
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 04:02 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,617
Liked 815 Times on 623 Posts
Likes Given: 125


It is a simple, bare bones, especially-reliable-and-useful-for-the-money-they-USED-to-be semi auto military rifle. They are damned near indestructible. Already obsolete in many respects when they were $200 with a case of 1,400 rounds of new Norinco ammo, I still couldn't help but think "China has become the arsenal of democracy*." For that kind of money I couldn't see anything better to cache in on. Even today's Mosin-Nagant doesn't hold a candle to it in this regard...

I sent my trigger out to be done (might have been lipstick on a pig, but, it really was too long and creepy for my taste and limited collection), the LOP was corrected by a typically stinky Chinese rubber 1" extension (with a hole that still let u access the cleaning kit in the butt), the sights leave something to be desired, and the position of the hand on the forearm has to be rather far forward due to the integral 10-rnd magazine. Finally, accuracy is common military with milsurp level ammo.

Good luck.

*This, of course, is why Clinton stopped their importation.

Last edited by HockaLouis; 05-20-2013 at 04:08 PM.
HockaLouis is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:21 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,921
Liked 2663 Times on 1566 Posts
Likes Given: 611


A good solid short rifle in a decent, affordable, and available ammo chambering. It's not a modern combat masterpiece. But it is good fun and handy enough for what it is. Represents a transitional phase in small arms philosophy. Was a tool of the Cold War for establishing good will with budding communist countries and represents some good firearms history in that regard.

To me they seem at their best in stock military form. They are fun enough and practical enough in that form that I fail to see any good reason to try to make one into something that the SKS is not. Then you can have the fun of shooting something historically accurate that is entertaining to shoot just as it was designed.

They are not sniper rifles, and they are not assault rifles. I prefer to enjoy them the way they are.
SSGN_Doc is offline  
PanBaccha Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:27 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
readygirl's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,238
Liked 744 Times on 435 Posts
Likes Given: 958


I think you should have bought a truckload of them when they were $99.00.
The Founders DID anticipate that arms technology would advance, that's why the 2nd amendment doesn't say "the right to keep and bear a musket".......
readygirl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:36 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,698
Liked 2615 Times on 1486 Posts
Likes Given: 2004


I like mine a lot.

Keep one original, got a modified stock on the other.

They are strong, well-built, simple, and complete.

I like the balance and workmanship on my Russian,

but I have seen Chinese and Yugos which are nice.

The grenade launcher upsets the great overall balance

of the carbine, but acts as a counterweight to put the

sights back on target quicker.

It's my truck gun for camping and fishing.

I used one of HockaLouis's "stinky butt" recoil pads,

and it straightened out the LOP fine.

Last edited by therewolf; 05-21-2013 at 03:40 AM.
therewolf is offline  
PanBaccha Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:39 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
towboater's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewares,Ky
Posts: 3,664
Liked 1798 Times on 937 Posts
Likes Given: 3799


I prefer the Russian. I think they are built a little better.

I owned many different kind back when they were dirt cheap.

Last edited by towboater; 05-21-2013 at 03:43 AM.
towboater is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 04:08 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
marc29th's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 667
Liked 91 Times on 67 Posts


Get the Russian if you can find one. Mine is a 1954 Tula Arsenal. Had it almost 20 years now.

marc29th is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Need Your Thoughts CourtJester Ammunition & Reloading 16 01-23-2013 04:45 AM
Need thoughts on this gun dalefan88 Semi-Auto Handguns 20 12-09-2012 07:49 AM
any thoughts on q20 blu MikeBofAZ Cleaning and Maintenance 0 12-03-2012 10:46 AM
thoughts about xd 9mm sc nulife1 XD Forum 9 01-11-2012 04:50 PM
Any thoughts on the FN PBR? SGT_Calle General Rifle Discussion 4 01-08-2010 02:49 PM

Newest Threads